Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Energy
|This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Energy and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4|
|WikiProject Energy||(Rated Project-class)|
|This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
The AP1000 Units "which are currently on schedule to go into service in 2020."Edit
WECTEC Post Bankruptcy personnel have rumored the current schedule now indicates completion in 2023 with a cost to complete estimated at 10.8 Billion Dollars.
2020 oil warEdit
The 2020 Russia–Saudi Arabia oil price war is currently rated low-importance, but with oil prices falling below zero (producers paying people to take their oil), this seems to be of more import? Especially since it is an oil industry crash for regions with hard access oil (oil shale, oil sand, etc). And regional economic crashes for producers of higher priced production oil. -- 220.127.116.11 (talk) 08:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Portal:Energy, Portal:Renewable energy, and Portal:Wind powerEdit
Articles that you have been involved in editing—Portal:Energy, Portal:Renewable energy, and Portal:Wind power—have been proposed for merging with Portal:Energy industry. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Guilherme Burn (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Home energy upgrades from public utilitiesEdit
I've started a Wikipedia article that can become a useful reference for people who work in or around the Public utility industry world wide. The article, Home energy upgrades from public utilities, has initially been placed in the scope of the Energy WikiProject. I've developed the article to its present form, which provides information on some key utility assistance programs in the United States and several other countries.
In its current state, the article just scratches the surface of the utility-homeowner assistance story and could be further developed to cover many more assistance programs. This is one of so many matters where Wikipedia's objectivity can help hold the climate change needle to +1.5 degrees C in 2100.
I'm looking for Wikipedia editors that find this topic compelling. Does this subject interest you? Can you suggest others who may be motivated by this theme?
Thanks, in advance, for your thoughts!
- Very nice topic! As you mention is just scratches the surface, and I don't think it's appropriate for Wikipedia to attempt to a catalogue these: they should be discussed holistically, perhaps from the viewpoint of how state/federal legislature requires utilities to offer some of these programs. I added a link to DSIRE which is where residents should really go if they want a comprehensive list of what might be available to them. Not to mention this being US-centric. Thanks for your work on this, and perhaps there are more articles than can link to it so it might get more traffic. Reywas92Talk 22:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Was wondering is some members of this WikiProject would mind taking a look at this article? I came across it via WP:THQ#posting a picture. There quite a bit of formatting cleanup that’s probably needed, but it’s the overall promotional tone and a bit iffy WP:NORG that might need a looking at by multiple errors. There may have been some WP:COI/WP:UPE editing over the years, including the most recent burst, but that can be cleaned up or trimmed out if the organization is notable. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikidata in listsEdit
At Talk:List_of_active_coal-fired_power_stations_in_Turkey#Keeping_this_list_in_step_with_other_articles_and_lists I propose that if a list exists in a non-English Wikipedia the corresponding English list should be allowed to use Wikidata for its tables.
Your comments there would be welcome.
What should the fossil fuel phase-out article look like?Edit
If you have a view please comment at Talk:Fossil_fuel_phase-out#Scope_and_structure_of_the_article?
FAR renewable energy in ScotlandEdit
I have nominated Renewable energy in Scotland for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Femke Nijsse (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)