Plato and Aristotle discussing something. Unexplained:Plato's laptop.

Smooth-On, Inc.Edit

Hello, I saw a recent comment on the Smooth-On page regarding some text which may require some edits due to 'jargon-y' content. Was there a specific section which seemed like it needed to be made more concise. Thank you so much. Hondo2160 (talk) 13:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Structure of the Austrian Armed Forces in 1989 DRV CloseEdit

Hi Wily. You closed the DRV on Structure of the Austrian Armed Forces in 1989 as no consensus. No argument there. You then went on to write DRV procedures treat that "sort of" like an endorse, in that I won't pre-emptively restore the article, but I, or any other admin, can send it to draft or undelete it for a relevant merge or the like. I find that confusing. Can you point me to those procedures or similar closes by other admins? I'm not as regular at DRV as I was say 12 months ago but I still regularly am around and have not seen such a close and the actual writing at DRV says of no consensus in most cases this has the same effect as endorsing the decision being appealed. However, in some cases, it may be more appropriate to treat a finding of "no consensus" as equivalent to a "relist"; admins may use their discretion to determine which outcome is more appropriate. Thanks for your time and clarification. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Roman StaněkEdit

Hi! Can you draftify Roman Staněk for me please? Thanks. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 12:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)