Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

T0mpr1c3 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Factual inaccuracy in the above. I reject User:Cullen328's assertions of disruptive editing. There was in fact an extended discussion on Talk:Claude Shannon that I initiated myself. Even though, in this instance, I consider the consensus to be wrong, I agree that it is a matter of editorial discretion. All my edits have been reverted and I have not engaged in edit warring to change that. Blocking me after the fact, and indefinitely, is simply piling on. Somebody else can talk some sense into these people. I am done here. τ℗ʍ (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You may disagree with consensus, but then implementing the non-consensus version of things in dozens of articles is nothing but disruptive. This goes doubly for Erdös, where you were pointed to past discussions about this topic. If you're done here, there's no reason to unblock you. Huon (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

T0mpr1c3 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been criticized for lack of self-reflection before, but never by a collection of people so peremptory and self-righteous. All the same I commit to making no further disruptive edits, indeed no further edits in the Wiki mainspace at all, in the hope that this account may be in good standing going forward and can be retired according to my wishes expressed above.τ℗ʍ (talk) 04:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you don't intend to edit, there is no reason to unblock you. I don't know if stewards have responded to your request, but they will either do it or not, although my understanding is that Wikipedia is physically located in the United States and not subject to UK or EU law. 331dot (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

T0mpr1c3 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Let me break it down real simple. Short words. This is my request. 1. I need this account unblocked so that it is in good standing. 2. I need this account in good standing so that it can be renamed, according to Wikipedia's own guidelines, which the stewards presumably follow. 3. I need this account renamed so that it can be retired according to my request above. I also have some polite suggestions for reviewers. Read or ignore as you see fit. a. I suggest that Wikipedia should consider safeguarding my privacy, as an EU citizen, with privacy rights that are guaranteed by EU law, unless Wikipedia does not intend to operate in the EU going forward (which could be the case, I don't have a crystal ball). b. If a reviewer does not know whether or not Wikipedia is obligated to follow certain privacy standards, I suggest that reviewer would be well advised to find out before pre-emptively dismissing the notion, if this is relevant to the reviewer's self-appointed role. τ℗ʍ (talk) 22:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What you need (stated above) and what Wikipedia needs (for disruptive accounts to remain blocked) are entirely different matters. As Wikipedia administrators, we are only interested in the latter. Since your needs do not happen to coincide with Wikipedia's in this instance, I am declining your request. Yunshui  07:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Declined unblock requests cannot be removed while you are blocked, I have restored them. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Muntaser IbrahimEdit

Hi! I just came by to let you know that Muntaser Ibrahim has been freed [1]. I was so happy to hear this news, and figured you would be as well. On another note, I'm very sorry to see that you've retired from Wikipedia. I greatly appreciated your contributions and thoughtful feedback on the article on Ibrahim, which I think really improved both the article and DYK. Wishing you well! Philepitta (talk) 04:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Karel WiesnerEdit

 On 17 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karel Wiesner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Czech chemist Karel Wiesner, unable to study at university under the German occupation, set up a laboratory in the basement of his parents' house to teach himself polarography? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karel Wiesner. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karel Wiesner), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Attilio MaseriEdit

 On 23 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Attilio Maseri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Italian cardiologist Attilio Maseri has been the physician to both Queen Elizabeth II and Pope John Paul II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Attilio Maseri. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Attilio Maseri), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Agnes UllmanEdit

 

Hello, T0mpr1c3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agnes Ullman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Scottish women scientists by field has been nominated for mergingEdit

 

Category:Scottish women scientists by field, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)