Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm always excited to see new editors on history of science-related articles, especially (assuming your username is who you are) established scholars. Here is some of the boilerplate for new editors, some of which you might find useful:


Hello, SteveMcCluskey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

You might also be interested in the History of Science WikiProject, which is an attempt to coordinate work on anything remotely related to the history of science. Its a good place to get feedback from like-minded editors. User:Maestlin in particular might share some of your interests. I hope you find editing Wikipedia to be a rewarding experience.--ragesoss 18:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

SB datesEdit

Thanks for your note, details here. Rich Farmbrough 10:54 2 February 2010 (UTC).

GA reassessmentEdit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Astronomy in medieval Islam has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

The State Archives Of Assyria 18th centuryEdit

Hi there Sir, What if i tell to someone (like you) that i have the original text book of The State Archives of Assyrian 18th Century,would you believe me? Do you believe in Ancient Gods from Egypt or (alien) Cosmic God (Orion) and their existence ? let's say the latest was last month December 3-11 ,2014. If i remember correctly from that date we had this scary sky Wrath from Gods as we knew it.Sorry for asking you these questions in this section, please sir i'm looking forward for your reply,it would be very much appreciated.Thank you and Happy New Year. fb:Kelly Lagasca Paladin a.k.a.UPDISC78 (talk)Hazel AlpakUPDISC78 (talk)


On the "Computus" talk page you wrote

Much of this secondary literature can be used to support the passage with the frequent citation needed flags from the section on Tabular Methods. I'm busy at the moment but will provide appropriate citations in a few days. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 14:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I have provided secondary sources for several of the requested citations, and would appreciate if you could check your sources and see of you agree with my edits. Also, I was not able to find a citation for the paragraph that begins "Historically the paschal full moon date for a year...." Although the role of the golden number was changed and reduced to the point that it could be ignored completely if desired, I don't have a citation for the claim that "the tabular dates go out of sync with reality after about two centuries." Obviously the old method does go out of sync, but I don't have a reliable source for how quickly this occurs.

I would also delete beginning at "but from the epact method, a simplified table", to and including paragraph after the table with year headings 2014–2032. This table appears to be original research, along the lines of what if we redid the work of the clerics, mathematicians, and astronomers of Alexandria, and made their method agree as best as possible to the 21st century astronomical positions of the Sun and Moon? Jc3s5h (talk) 00:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You've got mailEdit

Hello, SteveMcCluskey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 09:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Archaeoastronomy in MaltaEdit

Hello SteveMcCluskey, thank you for your kind instruction concerning my Wikipedia entry about archaeoastronomy in Malta. Please feel free to read and to study my Wikibook. So far nobody seems to be interested in its content or even in an appropriate publication. However, this is although it is easy to contercheck for any astronomer and it might be an important contribution to archaeoastronomy. --Bautsch (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)