Welcome to Wikipedia!!!Edit

Hello Pgp688! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button   located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 21:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Congrats on your contributions to Boston Latin School, one of which happened to be edit #123,456,789 on the English Wikipedia! --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 21:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you move a page maliciously, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blanchardb 00:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:NotreDameSeal.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NotreDameSeal.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NotreDameSeal.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:NotreDameSeal.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

image helpEdit

No problem on the help with Image:NotreDameSeal.png. Happy to lend a hand. :) Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Are you still in the South Bend area?Edit

Dear PGP:

I am working on the Mesoamerican ballgame article and I am looking for a few good photos of ballplayer figurines. The Snite Museum on the campus of the University of Notre Dame has a nice collection of these figurines and so I am canvassing editors who might be in the area to see if they could snap some photos for me. Hence the question: Are you still in the South Bend area and would you be interested in heading over to the museum to take some photos??

Let me know, and thanks for your time, Madman (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Secondary SchoolEdit

What are you trying to do? Need help? RossPatterson (talk) 02:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Notre Dame Leprechaun.pngEdit

Image:Notre Dame Leprechaun.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Notre Dame Leprechaun.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:Notre Dame Leprechaun.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

And I've removed the image from your ND fan userbox. Unfortunately, per the non-free content criteria, you can't use non-free images to decorate your user page. Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 06:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the Gene Larkin HS referencesEdit

I noted at Chaminade High School today that there was no reference that Larkin graduated from there. Thank you not only for referencing it there, but also for referencing it in the Gene Larkin article! I was ready to copy the citation over when I saw that you had already done it. —C.Fred (talk) 00:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

University of Notre DameEdit

Hi, since you are pretty much the only person who has been improving the University of Notre Dame article somewhat consistently (most of the other edits lately have been vandalism and reverts) I wanted to let you know that I had been working on improving the article on a subpage of my user page. I mostly integrated the lists into prose and added some sections and referencing. Anyway, I think I integrated everything from the article into my "improvements", but might have missed something somewhere if you are working on the page again. I just wanted to let you know. Phydend (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I was going to post eventually asking if people thought it was up to Good Article standards, but never got around to doing it. Phydend (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Hey, I'm going to nominate it for the Good Article status since the page is under such a large backlog that it might take a long time for it to be reviewed. It has been expanded slightly since you messaged me about it, so it might need to be improved, but hopefully the reviewer will list any problems. Phydend (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Berkshire.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Berkshire.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ND Wordmark.png)Edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:ND Wordmark.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Basketball110. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —ossmanntalk 21:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NotreDameSeal.png)Edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:NotreDameSeal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:NotreDameSeal.pngEdit

A tag has been placed on Image:NotreDameSeal.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:NotreDameSeal.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BJTalk 22:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

ND HockeyEdit

As you may have guessed, I post at ndnation under the same name. --Mr Wednesday (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Ravichandar84Edit

You are not an admin. Please don't tell users, such as at User talk:Ravichandar84, that they have been blocked, unless an admin has actually blocked them. Corvus cornixtalk 06:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk pagesEdit

Your comments and revisions to User talk:Ravichandar84 are in error, any user is allowed to delete messages on their own talk page at any time. Deletion is an indication the message was received, so it has served its purpose. In addition, this edit [1] seems to be impersonating an administrator, which you are not. Please be civil in your actions towards other editors. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 07:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Your efforts to harass Ravichandar84 need to stop at once. Users can remove ANY comments from their talk page at any time. Warning him for removing what he considers a racial attack is utterly unacceptable--leave this user alone or you will be blocked. Lawrence § t/e 06:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, please see: This thread on ANI. Lawrence § t/e 07:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:South bend indiana seal.svg)Edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:South bend indiana seal.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:NotreDameFightingIrish.svgEdit

I have tagged Image:NotreDameFightingIrish.svg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. -Nard 01:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pats 1971-1992 logo.PNG)Edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Pats 1971-1992 logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ALE-BOS-Logo.svg)Edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:ALE-BOS-Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

September 2008Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Intellectual11. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WODUP 23:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


Image source problem with Image:NotreDameSeal.svgEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:NotreDameSeal.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Boston Latin School AlumniEdit

Hello, I am wondering why you removed two of the School's better-known alumni: architect Richard Morris Hunt and his brother Leavitt Hunt? These two fellows were interesting people, and both pioneers in their fields -- one in architecture; the other in photography. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I am not a BLS alum (Phillips Exeter here), but I will happily provide sources for these two men, who were both quite prominent -- and a credit to their alma mater. It will probably be tomorrow before I do. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Greetings again. Thanks for adding Richard Morris Hunt. I have attempted (not sure of format) to re-add his brother Leavitt Hunt. (I have appended source, which is the Catalogue of the Boston Latin School, Established in 1635, With an Historical Sketch, by Henry F. Jenks, published by the Boston Latin School Association in 1886. (I added a link to the book on archive.gov, although I know I've seen the text on google books as well, and am attempting to locate it there because it'll make for easier reading.) If you'll notice, the Leavitt Hunt I am adding was originally called 'Henry Leavitt Hunt, afterwards Leavitt Hunt,' as the BLS book puts it. It's the same fellow, son of Congressman Jonathan Hunt, and brother of Richard Morris Hunt, whom you've already added. Thank you.MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Here is the original citation, courtesy googlebooks, of Leavitt Hunt listed in the Catalogue of the Boston Latin School from 1886 (original page): [2] I will attempt to insert it in the proper place on the Alumni page, but I've been having some trouble getting that to come out right.MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, I added some things to the lede to give the BLS credit for its graduates in the arts. Might you consider adding a photo of Richard Morris Hunt to the piece? (His photo is on his wiki entry.) The man was the first American graduate of the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, designed the facade of part of the Louvre, and subsequently became one of the preeminent architects in American history, as well as the founder of the American Institute of Architects and the Municipal Art Society. I think he'd make a sterling poster child for the arts graduates of BLS. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 04:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Went ahead and added Richard Morris Hunt.MarmadukePercy (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Boston Latin School AlumniEdit

Hello, I'm wonder why you are removing names from the list: Burton Malkiel, Jonathan Jackson - Del to Cont. Congress... too many to name. A simple Google search [3] Or [4]... will bring up solid citations for the uncited ones. If you cannot find citations, why don't you simply assume bona fides, and keep the names in the list and comment them out?

Your list edits are good, but the point is to add, not subtract.The way you are doing it, by omission, is destructive and unhelpful. -Sixtyenjoy3423 (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

You have deleted Burton Malkiel. I cannot find it in the source, am I missing something here? More over the pursuit for the featured list status is fine. But why don't you do so by striving to add citations to uncited names rather than simply deleted the uncited ones. That seems like cheating. Sure it's more work, but isn't that the point of featured lists???-Sixtyenjoy3423 (talk) 01:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Your userpageEdit

Considering where it directs users to I would appreciate it if you removed the 'new messages' tag. Frankly I expected more of someone who puts as much effort into his work as you do on List of Boston Latin School alumni. Ironholds (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged RevsEdit

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 06:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the hard workEdit

Just a note to say thank you for all the work you put into List of Boston Latin School alumni, especially since it is only our (WP:Schools) third featured list and the first one about alumni. Great job. I especially like how well you worked with the other editors. Dbiel (Talk) 13:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Bet ya didn't know his was the 123456789th edit made to Wikipedia! [5] -- OlEnglish (Talk) 04:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of User:Pgp688/BLSEdit

I have nominated User:Pgp688/BLS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 02:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Help with tablesEdit

I made a new table to be used on List of American football stadiums by capacity. I copied the code for Template:StadiumimgStart from a another table which was based on Template:AlumniStart, which I noticed you have edited. I was wondering how to use the parameters Option1 and Option2 to add new columns, so I can use this template on another article. Thank you in advance. --Pgp688 (talk) 00:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Look at how I've added Position to List of Georgia Institute of Technology athletes#American football. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:AlumniStart2Edit

 Template:AlumniStart2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 18:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Hank Aaron AwardEdit

Criticism is fine. When it's sourced. See my Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year Award article, I include the criticism about rookie definitions for Japanese players. But it's sourced. Staxringold talkcontribs 04:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:QuebecNordiques.svgEdit

Thanks for uploading File:QuebecNordiques.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer grantedEdit

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SuperBowlXLV.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading File:SuperBowlXLV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Testing my new signatureEdit

How does it look? --pgp688 talk to me see my work 18:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mass DCR.pngEdit

Thanks for uploading File:Mass DCR.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk)

Photographs of New England Patriots playersEdit

Hey, thanks a million! Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

List of Boston Latin School alumniEdit

Hi PGP,

Great job with getting List of Boston Latin School alumni up to featured list status! I have nominated the article to go up on the main page in the Today's Featured List section. Some concerns about the article have been raised here. If you are willing to help address these concerns, it would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Libraries SeattleEdit

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
 
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Fighting Irish football future schedule (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearanceEdit

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of Boston Latin School alumni know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on July 29, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/July 29, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad.   Thanks! Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BridgeimgEdit

 Template:Bridgeimg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Notre Dame InviteEdit

Hey! I know you are already a member and you've been one of the most active members of our project, but I just wanted to give you a heads up on the fact that I've been revamping the project. If you'd like to contribute, please follow the links below. Especially, check out the To DO list, and our talk page. I also created this invite banner, so we can all invite people we believe might be interested. Thanks!

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Pgp688. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ALE-BOS-Logo.svgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ALE-BOS-Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:NotreDameSeal.svg listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NotreDameSeal.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 18:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Pgp688. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signatureEdit

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Pgp688|<font color="green">'''pgp688'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Pgp688|'''talk to me''']] [[Special:Contributions/Pgp688|'''see my work''']]</small> : pgp688 talk to me see my work

to

[[User:Pgp688|<b style="color: green">pgp688</b>]] <small>[[User talk:Pgp688|'''talk to me''']] [[Special:Contributions/Pgp688|'''see my work''']]</small> : pgp688 talk to me see my work

Anomalocaris (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Pgp688. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Notre DameEdit

Hello Pgp688, I just wanted to thank you for your work for the WikiProject Notre Dame. I am currently making an effort to revamp it and improve all articles. I was wondering if you could help out, since any and all help is needed. If you want, you can check out the To Do list for the top priority, or take your own initiative and work on what's needed the most. The top priority articles in bad condition, like the colleges or the grotto, need a lot of help too. Additionally, photos or translation in other languages are also great.

Best and thank once more for your work on Wikipedia, Eccekevin (talk) 02:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)