A page you started (Ellevio) has been reviewed!Edit
Thanks for creating Ellevio, Per W!
Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Consider adding reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Meatsgains (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 1Edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louise Penny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Extended Kalman filterEdit
Moved to Talk:Extended_Kalman_filter
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit
 | Hello, Per W. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Bornholm Cable moved to draftspaceEdit
An article you recently created, Bornholm Cable, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 11:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Delta (orienteering club) moved to draftspaceEdit
An article you recently created, Delta (orienteering club), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing my article, Justlettersandnumbers! Apart from the missing references for the members of the club, what more pieces of information lack sources? I have presented the basic facts and the major success of the club. I can add more medals that it won. Per W (talk) 14:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Per W! I think it's great that you're adding stuff about sport that, for once, is not football of one kind or another. For articles about clubs and the like, our notability guideline is this; I moved this page to draft to allow you to add enough solid independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the club to demonstrate that it meets that guideline. Pages with insufficient sourcing to show notability are liable to be nominated for deletion, new pages particularly so. If you like I will also move Vehkalahden Veikot to draft, as I think it too is vulnerable. I haven't looked at your other edits. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Then let's keep the discussion in one place, Justlettersandnumbers! Both clubs belong (or belonged) to the 25 best ones in Finland. That can be measured by the number of medals in relays. Also the newspapers (at least the Swedish ones) mention the runners of these clubs and what happened during the competitions. I have access to a database with Swedish newspapers, where there are also lots of mentions of the clubs together with a runner in individual races. In Finland there should be more sources. Per W (talk) 14:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Per W, I think I'm going to disengage from this conversation – once again I learn that there is a local consensus for sports notability that is totally at variance with the project-wide consensus (in this case, WP:NCORP). I try not to engage with any sports-related article for just that reason – we have, for example, strict notability requirements for academics based on actual achievement, but anyone who has ever kicked a ball and been paid for it is apparently "notable". I'm sorry to have troubled you, thank you for your courteous willingness to discuss. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- I basically agree with you, Justlettersandnumbers, about the risk of having too low criteria for presumed notability. Just for the sake of completeness (for others reading this discussion), I add that I try to concentrate on the top athletes and on the top clubs, on those that have actually achieved something. --Per W (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Per W, I think I'm going to disengage from this conversation – once again I learn that there is a local consensus for sports notability that is totally at variance with the project-wide consensus (in this case, WP:NCORP). I try not to engage with any sports-related article for just that reason – we have, for example, strict notability requirements for academics based on actual achievement, but anyone who has ever kicked a ball and been paid for it is apparently "notable". I'm sorry to have troubled you, thank you for your courteous willingness to discuss. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Then let's keep the discussion in one place, Justlettersandnumbers! Both clubs belong (or belonged) to the 25 best ones in Finland. That can be measured by the number of medals in relays. Also the newspapers (at least the Swedish ones) mention the runners of these clubs and what happened during the competitions. I have access to a database with Swedish newspapers, where there are also lots of mentions of the clubs together with a runner in individual races. In Finland there should be more sources. Per W (talk) 14:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Per W! I think it's great that you're adding stuff about sport that, for once, is not football of one kind or another. For articles about clubs and the like, our notability guideline is this; I moved this page to draft to allow you to add enough solid independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the club to demonstrate that it meets that guideline. Pages with insufficient sourcing to show notability are liable to be nominated for deletion, new pages particularly so. If you like I will also move Vehkalahden Veikot to draft, as I think it too is vulnerable. I haven't looked at your other edits. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26Edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IFK Lidingö, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fredrik Johansson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creationEdit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delta (orienteering club) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Delta (orienteering club), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for May 25Edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IK Hakarpspojkarna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bornholm Cable has been acceptedEdit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy (talk) 09:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)OopsEdit
Thought that was a typo. DS (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, that's happens, DragonflySixtyseven! I did a similar thing the other day. Per W (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8Edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Borlänge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |