Basarab the First articleEdit

Regarding the Basarab the first article. Why are there very controversial theories being portrayed as "absolute truths"; by using the verb "IS", instead of something like "maybe" or at least "according to...". It's very unprofessional! I will add the reference. I'm a bit of a newcomer and didn't know it's absolutely essential to add citations.

Regarding website linkEdit

Hi Sir @Materialscientist- the article Pahari people (Kashmir) under editing is away from the ground facts. A Goverment of Jammu and Kashmir department working for Pahari Speaking People of the area refers them as linguitic group on official website. Link peasted as citation but the article in question is saying that this is an ethinic group which is not correct. It looks that a major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject/ community which is making this article onesided.May please see.

IP has now created an accountEdit

Hi MS. As per my previous message, it would appear the same IP has now created an account to make the same disruptive edits (IP edit vs Teminater edit). The matching pipe-linked edit summaries are also a bit of a giveaway as well as the articles being edited. Could I ask you to take a look please? Robvanvee 10:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Sock farm Jagdeep singh bittuEdit

This one looks like another sock of User:Jagdeep singh bittu. Similar modus operandi. Kindly protect the page. Note that I've also filed a page protection request at WP:RFPP and reported WP:AIV. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Daniah MohanadEdit

To me it looks like good-faith edits of a complete newcomer. Translating WP is not an easy task, and the guy likely did not know how to post translation to correct wiki. I think your block is far too much - the guy should instead be encouraged and guided to build Kurdish Wikipedia. Please reconsider. bw, — kashmīrī TALK 14:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


For that user I reported which you just removed, I saw the filter triggers from 10/31, and I thought it was 10/31 as in yesterday. I realize now those were from last year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLCStudent (talkcontribs)


Congratulations on getting unblocked. Maybe you could run for admin one day. [FBDB] (please {{ping|}} on reply; thanks!) --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I think a review is called for. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 15:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Man, your block log is even fatter than mine and has two recent vandalism blocks! I have a prideful reference to my blocks at the top of my userpage; maybe that would be something for you? Even though you don't have a gold-star block like this one of mine. Bishonen | tålk 16:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC).
Seriously, I notice the last three times you've been blocked, the blocker was yourself. Do you have some script where clicking the wrong button blocks you rather than your target? Or is it simply something you are doing to make us all chuckle? Tarl N. (discuss) 21:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
It is not a script, it is an advanced program called WP:HG, which often mishandles realtime reverts and substitutes the vandalising user with the reverting user. Most often this reverting user is myself, hence the blocks :-). Luckily Wikimedia allows me to rescue myself ;-). Materialscientist (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
I think Material is probably trying to rival the king of self-blocks, El C. Shoot for the stars![1] Bishonen | tålk 01:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
That brings me back. Ah, the misadventures of youth! El_C 04:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Range block?Edit

Hello, Materialscientist! At the talk page of Sasha Banks, you blocked a disruptive IP, Another IP in the same general range,, promptly started disrupting. Would a rangeblock be possible? If it is, I’d prefer that to protecting the talk page as requested at RFPP. Thanks. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Rangeblocking or semiprotrotecting is technically possible, but there is not enough disruption for either action. Post something here if the situation escalates. Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


Hi, Materialscientist, I was wondering if you could take a look if this is vandalism too. You reverted a former edit of this anonymous user. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for responding to multiple reports. Excutient (talk) 10:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Kidnapping of Jaycee DugardEdit

They've danced to another IP pool now. It's User:2600:1016:B01C:8BEE:745A:97F8:525A:36D8 this time. Note the 2600:1016:B01C... as opposed to 2600:1016:b001... that you previously blocked. Same disruptive edits. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, MS. Happy Holidays. The IP vandal has returned, and is continuing to make the same edits. Can you put another block on the article, this time for a longer period? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Tom and Jerry Pirate movieEdit

With your permission, can I add the fact that one of the pirate brothers is actually a dwarf or it's unnecessary

Olivier Baghdadi (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

FYI - unblockEdit

HI Material,

Apologies if I already did this, but just ensuring you're aware of an unblock request at User talk:Rkprince21. It could probably use a little clarification on the original block reasoning to ensure the questions are appropriately directed. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please see my reply here [2]. Materialscientist (talk) 15:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Question about edits on hip hop feminism articleEdit

hey, Materialscientist, i saw you reverted my edits on the lead section of the hip hop feminism article here: Hip-hop feminism. i shortened the lead section to better reflect what hip hop feminism is an a type of black feminism in the lead section rather than opening on what a hip hop feminist (the person who studies/or is a hip hop feminism). although you said this edit was unconstructive, i was wondering could you suggest what would be a more constructive edit to improve the article. Rone Bee (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Rone Bee

Another pool dancing IPEdit

Greetings. On Perry High School (Stark County, Ohio), there's a dancing IP in the 2603:9000:990d:4bc3... range. Vandalism on that article from that IP range over the last 1.5 days. I'd rather not protect the article if blocking the range would help. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Socks at Bashar MasriEdit

Hi Materialscientist, Lalaeqwv (talk · contribs) looks like another block evasion. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Argh, you beat me to vandalism yet again!

Good job, though. Keep up the good work!

Littlecat456💬(.log) 10:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Messing up the page...Edit

Hi Materialscientist, please take a look at Karauli page. Some new editor is messing it up by over-writing things on already cited information rather than adding the data at proper place. Thanks. --HinduKshatrana (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist, please do take a look into this. Thanks. --HinduKshatrana (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Please explain them, on their talk page, what is wrong with their edits. Materialscientist (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Recreation of CSD G4Edit

Hi Material,

I've re-created Anveshi Jain, both as I felt that G4 applies more strictly to genuinely deleted articles but also that, in such a borderline case, there were benefits to its existence in an AfD.

Nightfury indicated that they'd talked to you and you were okay with it being re-created without further discussion if an admin felt it should - apologies if this was a poor reading - I'm happy to discuss it further if so. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


Blocked User, keeps making original Reaseach. 1Mr.User200 (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Here have a goat!Edit

I have decided to give you a goat, please enjoy your goat and take good care of him.

Pixel ArtEdit

I was not promoting anything. I was not uploading anything inappropriate. This is a good website for people who want to test it out. It would be easier if they just went to the the link I put then to search it by exiting or not exiting the website. This is easier if they just went to that link. So with your permission can I search for more links and post them on the pixel art. Please and Thank You. --PotatoPotatoPotatoTomato (talk) 18:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive userEdit

Regarding this, kindly note that the the user has already been (level-4) warned by me for unsourced additions/changes in Sena dynasty article. Also note personal attacks (cuss) here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Anveshi JainEdit

Now that AfD has concluded and the result is delete. Can you please WP:SALT Anveshi Jain again? Way too many paid users have tried to recreate it in recent times. Thanks Coderzombie (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


Can user:19dn29c2o0 please be blocked asap. CLCStudent (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

If you want a quick action, use {{user|19dn29c2o0}}, but not [[user:19dn29c2o0 ]]. Materialscientist (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


I feel like I cannot edit without who reporting my work as vandalism when it is not vandalism.:( Why is that?


Hello materialscientist, I saw your recent work in fighting vandalism great job man. I want to ask some a question you are not an administrator and you blocked a user. from,Tbiw (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Terror & FootballEdit

Hello Materialscientist,

I'm Chrigre85822.

Re: 1998 World Cup terror plot

Either you were too fast or I was too slow.

There's the source now.

Thanks, Chrigre8582 (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

List of namesEdit

Hi, sorry to disturb you. When there is a list of names (e.g. People with the given surname XXX), what is the best order? - alphabetical or chronological? I'm not sure where to find the correct style. Thanks in advance. Denisarona (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Usually alphabetical, unless the list distinctly aims to present chronology. Materialscientist (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, that's what I usually follow. Denisarona (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks and suggestion regarding persistent disruptive editorEdit

Thanks for cleaning up after and putting a block on 2603:6080:e01::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). This is a persistent user who disruptively edits on two very specific topics...sister city pairings and children's TV shows. For reference, there are two previous ANI discussions about this user here and here. I see they also made another disruptive edit yesterday from (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which had previously had a temp block on it. I'd like to suggest a longer block on 2603:6080:e01::/64 than the 60 hours you put on it, and a fresh block on This person has engaged in this behavior over a period of almost four months now, refuses to respond to talk page messages, and is undeterred by IP blocks once they're able to move to a new IP or the blocks expire, so I'm not sure what else can be done. Thanks again. WildCowboy (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Joey DiazEdit

Hi, MS. Thanks again for putting a protection on Kidnapping of Jaycee Dugard. Can you place an extended block on Joey Diaz? I've had to remove uncited material from that article off and on for years now, and recently it seems to have flared up again, as I'm removing unsupported material from it seemingly every day. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Dorcy HowardEdit

Hi, apologies for not including a source for the latest edit for Warner Bros. Cartoons. But I should clarify, that Dorcy Howard was a verified background artist who worked on 2 Bob Clampett cartoons, Baby Bottleneck, and Kitty Kornered.


i view the series ,in sun tv and the story is progressing such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinchanedits (talkcontribs) 14:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Shinchanedits: Your opinions about the show do not belong in the article. You may write about what is depicted on screen, but you may not write opinions or interpretations. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

ok,added the plot as per the story,and not my opinion,sorry.

Protected edit request on 5 November 2020Edit

Markwolfy (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


  Not done this is not a valid edit request. — xaosflux Talk 16:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Would respond on my page, may cause hopefully avoidable drama because other user would read it.Edit

Hi Materialscientist,

I would write my question there, but the users involved just commented on my talk page directly above. So they would read the conversation too and it would be hard to ask for admin help without them seeing why I was trying to get admin help for incivility. I tried leaving several incivility warnings already. So it might start more drama if it is on my talk page. Please advise. I can write on ANI boards if preferred? (You can erase this).Music23123 (talk) 17:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless work to keep Wikipedia clear of vandalism. BJackJS talk 17:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Seconded. You've already reverted most of the unwanted changes on my watchlist tonight. Certes (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Pomphorhynchus laevisEdit

Dear Materialscientist, Thank you for keeping a close watch for vandalism and the like. Could you please have another look at the edits that I made (on Specifically, see that in the current, reverted version, reference 2 and 6 are the same. So are 3 and 7. There are a few other of such 'mistakes' in the references. I resolved most of these and used human friendly reference names. The latter will make future edits of the page easier. Please let me know if there is anything I missed. Looking forward to hear from you. Carcharias taurus (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

reply to: Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pomphorhynchus laevis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Am I reading too much into this?Edit

The edit summaries here seem to be saying things about someone who goes by "G. M." who might be a living person. I assume WP:BLP applies to edit summaries. On the other hand, this could be complete nonsense, which does not require special treatment. Your call. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Edits to Open Student Television NetworkEdit

The information that was on this article was not factually correct.

First, I traced down the management team of OSTN by checking:

It is incorrect that Shane Walker is the only "Key People".

After talking with Paul, Anthony and Rick I confirmed that Shane Walker was not offered a merger with OSTN. This is hearsay. I was told the reality was that Shane Walker's The University Network (TUN) ran out of money. He relocated to Ohio and joined OSTN as an employee.

Chi's Sweet HomeEdit

Both of my edits to Chi's Sweet Home fixes the original Japanese names of the episodes, adding some of the original Japanese names, the transliteration of original Japanese names, as well as missing original air dates. If you need a source for the names and dates, AnimeNewsNetworkprovides citation. It would be greatly appreciated if you could please take another look at them, at least the ones made further down the list. Thank you.

Neilia HunterEdit

Hello Materialscientist, I note the Neilia Hunter article has been protected due to people vandalising it in the past few minutes inserting the word "retard" etc which is of course the best decision; just prior to this I had made this edit- - on the grounds that "educator" in the lead seems an unnecessary prettying-up of the fact that she was- as the linked article is titled and her own article makes clear, "a school teacher". Is there any other compelling reason for the use of "educator" over "teacher"? Online sources seem vague with regard to distinctions between the two, to say the least, with a suggestion that "educator" carries more of a sense of nobility and dedication to one's occupation than perhaps "teacher" bears. Whether this is justified in Neilia Hunter's own case I hesitate to consider, knowing nothing of her career.

Also, I had removed a statement- "Biden later garnered controversy by making incorrect allegations that the truck’s driver, Curtis Dunn, who died in 1999, was drunk at the time" recently discussed at and, where- taking into consideration the analysis here- (Snopes being, per, "generally reliable" as a source)- the consensus appears to have been both that the element "Biden later garnered controversy" is unnecessarily loaded language that ought not to be included, and that a lack of emphasis in mainstream sources placed on the subject of the statement leads to a conclusion of WP:UNDUE. Naturally you may disagree with all of the above and (not being American, a Biden supporter [or opponent], or in any meaningful sense involved in the subject) since I don't have a horse in the race, I'm not really invested in making a huge deal out of it, but just wanted to account for the change made lest you consider it to have constituted part of the vandalism necessitating protection of the article. Best regards (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for youEdit

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For all of your work, especially at a time when disinformation is rife. Thank you. Risker (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure IslandEdit

Hello, is The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island substantially different from the version you deleted following AFD? Thanks, Captain Calm (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Not really. Deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Paul BunyanEdit

I don't know for the USA, but in Canada:

French-canadian is an ethnic group mainly located in St-Lawrence valley in Québec, eastern and northern Ontario and rlictualy in Manitoba and New-England (some famous french-canadian in the USA includes for instance: Céline Dion, Mario Lemieux, Jean-Louis "Jack" Kérouack, Léo Durocher, Robert Goulet etc.).

Franco-canadians are people people with french (from France, not from Canada) and and Canadian origin. For instance, a guy with a father form Paris and a mother from Toronto is a franco-canadian. French-canadians, Acadians ans Métis are not (or at least very rarely) designated by the term franco-canadian since the french (from France) originins are so remote

Over Seiko and brandsEdit

You can add more info using my links with the <ref>....</ref>. Many greetings. Al*from*Lig (talk) 12:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


Regarding this, looks like someone wants this article white washed. Too much vandalism today. Will it be possible to lock it? Kindly note that one of the users involved in it [3] is an autoconfirmed user. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Logged-in vandalEdit

Hi MS. I've reverted vandals before, but never one as persistent as BobEvansErie, an account clearly created to be annoying, and no idea what to do next. Doug butler (talk) 19:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


??? Wikiacc () 02:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award 2020Edit

Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award 2020
You are being awarded the Wikipedia Tranquility Waterfall Award for 2020. Enjoy the tranquility of this waterfall as we all enjoy the tranquility provided by your tireless efforts patrolling wikipedia. Psypheriumtalk page 03:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandal reportEdit

rmv unactionable reports? it means what? angys (Talk Talk) 09:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC) is not vandalising, their case is a content dispute at worst, such reports are not appropriate for WP:AIV. Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
So keep removing some scripts is considered not a vandalism? Ok btw how can I settle this case, maybe at other entry? angys (Talk Talk) 09:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Frankly, I don't understand why Chinese was added there before, so I understand why is removing it and adding names in a truly national language. We do not add names in minority languages, to avoid cluttering the lead. Those who really disagree would better seek consensus at the corresponding project(s), such as WT:Geography or WT:Malaysia. Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I’m doing a lot of rvv using [tool] the users need blocking some how, some comments were racist and one was sexually inappropriate. Gameshowandsportsfan2007 (talk) 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism in the page List of European countries by average wageEdit

The user Giolocam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has made his Wikipedia account just to boost up Italian data while using sources that don't match these edits or simply removing other sources. I have been editing this page over the past year and I remember some different Italian IPs/users doing the same, that's why the page got semi-protected but it seems new users are able to edit this page again. I don't know if this guy is the same person, but the only edits he has made in Wikipedia are in the same page, putting up the same unsourced boosted up numbers while deleting useful changes. Just check the history of List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to see what's happening there. --Pfarla (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

A Spanish has a net wage lower than an Italian. Pfarla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is trying to vandalize setting not reliable or not official sources about Italy.I set only OECD and ISTAT sources that are the only official ones. You can check it also in the article List of countries by average wage 2018. Please stop him. People laugh reading about it. I'm bored to correct his Spanish propaganda, or vandalism as you like more. Giolocam (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Somebody (a Spanish IP with a perfect timing with Pfarla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) ) just some hours ago vandalized in pro Spanish way the article List of countries by average wage.Please have a look at it. It's really strange by timing. Giolocam (talk) 22:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

He edited in this last article.He was the Spanish IP. He even lasted in disrupting. Time to block him.Giolocam (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Giolocam: You've made your Wikipedia account just to edit the page List of European countries by average wage boosting up Italian data as you were doing priorly with other IPs before the page got semi-protected. Now I can say it's clearly you because you write in the same way and you use the same unverifiable numbers. 2A02:2F0E:117:F400:2007:2401:6477:844 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) , 2A02:2F0E:419:2100:A89B:2504:BBE:E6F4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) , 2A02:2F0E:419:2100:E1CA:149F:250D:272A (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
I have also deleted the edits you have done in the page List of countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) because you are literally removing the proper order (by official data) just to boost up Italy in a higher place, as verifiable in the edit 988093606
The edits you do in the page List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) don't match any of your data because both OECD and ISTAT sources show gross data, net wages can be only calculated with online "calculate your net wage" websites such as you were saying in the edits when you didn't have an account, and a 2.400 gross wage in Italy is not 2.000 net but barely above 1.700 , lets cite all 3 sources: OECD gross source ISTAT Net wage calculator
You are now removing official data such as ISTAT and the net wage calculator just to remove my edits (which correct your fake data) saying you're "reverting my vandalism" for putting proper data. Proof, edit 988093758 I directly came to warn an administrator not because of the edit war you have made with invented data, but because your account has been made just to edit specific edits, just as proven above. It's also worth to notice that a new account came to my profile saying I'm involved in an "edit war"because I am correcting invented data that match 0 sources from a Wiki account that has only edited the same article, boosting up Italian data.

@Materialscientist: can you please take action? This user won't stop with his disruptive edits. --Pfarla (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: Pfarla posted not official sources by private agencies .The only valid sources are OECD and ISTAT ones. He also vandalized List of countries by average wage that i restored. The rest is his creativity derivided may be from Spanish complexes towards Italy. Sorry to write, but time to BAN HIM!Giolocam (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

After what I have proven above I guess I have nothing else to say. This user's only actions are accusation, I have warned him in his talk page and instead of replying anything, he came to mock and copypaste the same in my edit page he has also broken the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule in the page List of European countries by average wage so I guess I have to make a report because this user won't stop making his disruptive edits as he's trolling right now over this issue, just as he has proven making that copypaste in my talk page. --Pfarla (talk) 01:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Pfarla reverted several times in few hours too. Time to be banned. May be he is technically better than me in using Wikipedia because i'm new one , but he sets not correct sources with wrong numbers.Giolocam (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrator odered us to solve the situation but he doesn't seem able to do that.Giolocam (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Giolocam: what situation do you want to solve? Coming to troll my profile with a copypaste regarding the warning I gave you like in the edit 988096613? Or maybe after I explained everything in this talk page with all of the sources, but you have replied "The rest is his creativity derivided may be from Spanish complexes towards Italy. Sorry to write, but time to BAN HIM!"
I came here to try to solve something regarding the edits you have done, yet you only revert all my changes, you aren't able to prove any of your points but just making false accusations, then you troll and do copypastes and even after I have warned about you in the ANI you copied what I wrote and changed your username for mine. I have also proven above that different IPs have done the same edits you have done in 2020 and you have only edited these 2 articles, showing clearly your account was made for specifical purposes. --Pfarla (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm here to solve. I know my numbers are from official sources and so right. Stop sending smoke in eyes. You even wrote twice to administrator that said you no. Time to solve, but it seems you want war.Giolocam (talk) 02:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

What are you trying to solve? I have explained everything in this talk page in my prior edit yet you have reverted again and you made such claims, including breaking the 3 revert rule, when I have warned yourself in your talk page you didn't even reply but trolled and you did a copypaste of the same thing in my profile just switching our usernames. I came here trying to solve a dispute, instead of that you have made accusations and you have reverted everything. Then you have trolled my talk page and you have copied the same ANI I have made against you showing your edits. You have even deleted official ISTAT data and you keep putting the same invented data after I explained everything in my edit 988095067 in this talk page. You're just making disruptive edits. --Pfarla (talk) 02:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok you last in editing to administrator that stopped you already twice. You are ignoring him about collaboration. Wages in OECD article are net in 2018.If you use the average exchange rates for 2018 you find the sharp average net wage. You can't post unofficial sources. Giolocam (talk) 03:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry but what you say makes no sense, you didn't try to solve anything as you have just been accusing me, asking for my ban, trolling in my talk page... and now you try to "solve" what exactly if I have explained everything and you just keep saying the same without showing any sources?

1. Let's see the edits you have made in this page:

Italy has 38,485 and Spain has 38,761 but according to you, Italy has to remain higher. Just as in the box from below, where Italy has 38,132 but you put it above South Korea (39,985) and Spain (38,507) just as you put also Slovenia and Israel above Spain which have a lower number, just as Italy. What is exactly your point, proof or what do you want to solve here if it's obviously an edit to increase Italy's position while decreasing Spain's one??

2. Let's see the edits you have made in the page:

You are deleting official ISTAT 2019 data, you are putting 2018 OECD gross data which neither match your numbers. What's your point exactly?

Not even worth mentoning the fact of your replies, instead of trying to solve something here or in your talk page, you've just switched to 1. revert 2. accusating and 3. trolling just as you have done with the copypaste of my warnings in your profile, doing the same on my profile just switching usernames. What's exactly your point and what exactly do you want to solve if you have shown already your purpose? When I explained everything and I have tried to solve, you have replied "ban him, I hold the truth, it's a complex against Italy" while reverting my changes. --Pfarla (talk) 03:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I posted ISTAT but then it was better to use OECD. Calculator is only by region.You are lasting with empty words and dirtuptive behaviour.Giolocam (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

What? You have altered the ranking of that page (based on official data, just look at List of countries by average wage) as it's ridiculous to see that ranking of countries with lower numbers in higher positions, just as you repeat again the same stuff about the other page but none of your sources prove anything.
Nevermind, this is also related to your behavior. You didn't try to solve anything when this was a simple dispute (now you are more calmed after the reply of an administrator) but before you just switched to 1. revert 2. accusations 3. trolling (like the BAN HIM! stuff or doing copypastes of my warnings) just as you have done and it's everything proven and registered in your contributions. --Pfarla (talk) 03:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I never altered numbers, Spanish IP did it some hours ago.Now let's try to collaborate. Now i go to sleep. Good night.Giolocam (talk) 03:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

You didn't alter numbers, you've just changed the proper classification to one that unmatches the data for each country, you have inserted Italy above South Korea and Spain while it has a lower number. You've also inserted Spain under Italy, Slovenia and Israel while it has a bigger number. You have altered the order. You've done something similar in the other page, putting sources that don't match your data. And you were saying before you try to collaborate, sure. --Pfarla (talk) 03:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

User:MKWiiMaster74 unblockEdit

Hi Materialscientist, would you object to an unblock of MKWiiMaster74 (talk · contribs)? PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblocking is fine with me. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

FYI: Incorrect Warn LevelEdit

It looks like the warning you gave here got the incorrect warning level. Cheers! Perryprog (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Mistakes were made(by me or you)Edit

You reverted a change that I made that included a source [In plain sight],on .exe ,for the reason that it does not have a source .Can you please explain? -A wiki user. =[

Mistakes were made 2 Electric BoogalooEdit

Hi sir regarding the article Palazzina Appiani and your comment on my talk page I understand what you are saying! This is a school project that I am doing with my classmates and I forgot to include an explanation! Thank you so much for the remark! I made a mistake... Liucteo01 (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey buddha is not an incarnation of vishnuEdit

Balrama is the 8th avater of vishnu as per all Hindu scripture.No hindu in world believe on buddha Urdureporterchina (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank youEdit

Thank you for reverting those two edits on Renault and on Helia Emami! You beat me to it! Also, what code did you use for the 'Recent changes patroller?' Damien Swann (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I use WP:HG (I do prefer WP:Stiki, but it is inactive since March 2020). Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Please note that I had to create a talk page for someone just to warn them as they tried to change the name of someone and as such, created conflicting facts... - [User:Damien Swann|Damien Swann]]

Very great to join Wikipedia fune Country constitution must be follows. (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Regarding this...Edit

Hi Materialscientist, please do keep a watch on Jadeja page. Thanks. --HinduKshatrana (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Whenever I check the recent changes, I always see you reverting some kind of vandalism. That must take a lot of work! Eridian314 (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

You are erasing the fact I worked on somethingEdit

Hi, I'm S.R. Holiwell, I worked on Hardcoded, and you removed what I added to the wiki, making sure my contributions as a writer are erased, disempowered and deplatformed by people who want to take credit for my work. You say there's no proof or source I worked on Hardcoded, but my name is mentioned here:

"Such is the case with Hardcoded, a visual novel/horny porn game being made by Fortunae Virgo — a team lead by Kenzie Stargrifter, NSFW artist and nude aficionado, with S R Holiwell and Trix Royale."


"Hardcoded is a dating sim for PC that is currently in development. You can play it in its early form by subscribing to its Patreon, which is run by development studio Fortunae Virgo, made up of lead developer Kenzie Stargrifter, writer S R Holliwell, and animation helper Trix Royale."

People are trying to erase me and take credit for my work because I'm homeless, destitute, and vulnerable. I don't know if you're a bot or a real person, if you have a heart, but please, for the love of god, listen to me. You're hurting me deeply with this.


What about my edit to Timelapse of the Future did you think was disruptive? -- (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Than HtayEdit

There's so much vandalism happening on that article so fast that I think you inadvertently reverted me, restoring vandalism [4]. Could you just protect the article? There's been a request at RFPP for it (Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Than_Htay). Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Protected. Yes, my revert was a glitch, this happens when Huggle sorts out overlapping edits. Materialscientist (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Anton DrexlerEdit

Hi, i need your help against a sort of ideologized person who continue to edit with stupid things the page of Anton Drexler, especially the part of Drexler Work:My Political Awakening: From the Journal of a German Socialist Worker. This ideologized user continue to delete "from the journal of a german socialist worker", probably because he want to hide that Drexler was a socialist. But the title must be reported for entire.

Omicron Delta Epsilon - page editsEdit

Two corrections were made to the Omicron Delta Epsilon page. Reference 12 duplicated Reference 11, thus one was deleted. In opening paragraph the list of notable economists serving on the board was updated by removing Thaler and replacing with Romer.

That's all great fine and dandy, but that individual claims I have threatened him when there isn't one iota of evidence to support his silly claim. Dude sounds like a big chump s..t p...y to me.--Spoondivy (talk) 18:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Spoondivy: if you keep up your personal attacks, you're going to be blocked. It doesn't matter how right you may or may not be about the content dispute. You really need to learn to handle content disputes without needing to throw insults and personal attacks all over the place. Nil Einne (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Prince fabianEdit

Time to revoke TP access. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 07:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

tiprakok script is kokborok language partEdit

tripura is a historical state of indigenous people and 185 kings. tiprakok alphabet is modern script tripuri comunity. NGOs society and church comitee preaching since 2012. Donald128 (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Please reply me Donald128 (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

User talk:

I added a quick note over at this page: User talk: I wish the editor would login, but they may be prevented from doing so because they may be editing from a federal government network. Just a guess. That edit is ok, however, IMO, but it's your call. --Concertmusic (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Serengeti november 12Edit

Oh ok thanks I will be looking for more reliable sources and more of them thanks for pointing it out! It was my least cited edit of today so thx

A cookie for you!Edit

  Thanks for pointing it out. It is the least cited page I made today. I am a new editor and i created this account today and the serengeti article climate person is me. TigerScientist (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Frontier teg (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

The article is contradictory, it says Biden is the President Elect and also says the GSA determines who the President elect is and the GSA has specifically said they are not calling it yetEdit


Hi Materialscientist. Due to the ongoing Armenian-Azeri conflict, there has been a recent surge of disruptive editors, including Firatlal, who doesn't seem to be here to WP:BUILDWP, but push his own narrative. More or less of all his edits have been Turkic POV-pushing / ethno-nationalistic disruption:

[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

The same goes for these two editors as well, one of whom you just reverted and This is a bit concerning. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I can attest to this recent increase. Anyone who has edited the topic area constructively for years has probably noticed this. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Signing TimeEdit

In response to your message, you reverted a dead link. I replaced the dead link (including the citation) with an article that included the same subject matter and direct quote with image to the content that the dead link was referring to. I'm not sure what else is required here. If I preformed the edit improperly, please explain. Thanks

A Mistake?Edit

Hi Materialscientist. It looks like I've been blocked from editing, although I'm really not sure. I haven't edited anything for several years and would just like to continue to be able to read Wikipedia articles. I hope my IP address is visible, so you can make any changes that might need to be made, as I can't even recall my login any more. This looks like a mistake of some kind. (talk) 06:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ETH ZurichEdit

Thank you for your review. I will revert only the contributions of the ETH Zurich article that have suitable sources.


Hello Materialscientist. I am Joe Jacinto

I'm new were so I still don't know that I have to include a citation. I will put the citations now. If I miss anything, please tell me.

If you don't mind I'll re add the information. If you still don't think this is a reliable sources, You can remove the changes.

Thank you very much for contact me.

Joe Jacinto

Marjorie Greene would this be a citation?

= March DaysEdit

Hi MaterialScientist,

There have been a series of back and forth edits on the March Days page. As you can see, the person reverting my edits described them as "Jewish Propaganda". If you look at the first source cited it reads "Smith, Michael (April 2001). "Anatomy of Rumor: Murder Scandal, the Musavat Party and Narrative of the Russian Revolution in Baku, 1917–1920". Journal of Contemporary History. 36 (2): 228. doi:10.1177/002200940103600202. S2CID 159744435. "The results of the March events were immediate and total for the Musavat. Several hundreds of its members were killed in the fighting; up to 12,000 Muslim civilians perished as well as 3000 Jews at the hands of Armenian Dashnaks; thousands of others fled Baku in a mass exodus". That is to say, the first source mentions that the Armenian Dashnaks killed 3000 Jews in the March Days. I'm not very well versed in wikipedia editing but could you revert it to how it was with my edit sourced to the first source?

White Pigeon, MichiganEdit

Hi MaterialScientist, I do not know how to cite the source, but here is where I got the information,,1980s% Would you mind citing and reentering Jack "Jakk" Longacre, founder of the Highpointers Club, as he is notable, and was born in White Pigeon (talk)

Happy DiwaliEdit

.🪔HappyDeepawali🪔May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family.💠245CMR💠.👥📜 10:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Changes on pageEdit

Hi Materialscientist. Thanks for changes on Zakir Hasanov page. I want to give you additional information to add that page. This informations are approved.

Melbourne page disputeEdit

Hello, I'd appreciate your angle on a dispute taking place over at Melbourne. See the recent edit history from 13 Nov onward. Cheers. - HappyWaldo (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020Edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nema (community)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Delicate questionEdit

Hi! I'm not a power-user by any means, but I edit Wikipedia on a regular basis. A delicate question - where and how do I appropriately report a user whose edit summaries are bizarre, violate NPOV, and may create an unfriendly environment for other users. This user seems very interested in prurient content, that, while sourced, is often at a level of detail that goes beyond any encyclopedic interest that Wikipedia may have. I'm really not sure where the right place to go is to resolve this issue. Thank you for your help Ganesha811 (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Depends, but most likely WP:ANI. Materialscientist (talk) 14:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Materialscientist, I assume I will have to call out the user publicly there. There's no way to do this privately, correct? All Wikipedia processes are public? Just want to make sure I look before I leap, I've never had a problem with another editor like this before in my time on Wikipedia. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes, you will have to call out the user publicly there. Materialscientist (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Materialscientist, ok, thank you. I'll do that. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
I've now created a section at WP:ANI for this incident. Thank you for your help. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

I have a questionEdit

Hello You took out The Abraham Popoola as Rogers he is somone in the movie why did you take him out please let me know Ezzpin (talk) 15:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Des O'ConnorEdit

Hi, thank you for your work on the Des O'Connor article. It appears that you tried to remove the info about his death on the basis that it was unsourced, even if you didn't do so correctly. However, at the same time I see that you made this edit even though the claim of his death was still unsourced, and neither did you add any sources.

I see it's been sourced now, so this is just something for you to note for future reference. — Smjg (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Requesting input on Introduction to thermodynamic entropy RfCEdit

Hello! I am reaching out to several experienced Wikipedians regarding an impasse that is being reached in an RfC on the article Introduction to thermodynamic entropy, formerly titled Introduction to entropy.

In my opinion, the discussion is being dominated by physicist–editors who do not like the introduction as it currently stands (15 November 2020) or numerous recent attempts at an introduction that is friendly and accessible to the lay reader. These editors seek a rigorous introduction, the suggestions for which have been very unpalatable to me as a science communicator (e.g., "Entropy is a quantitative guide to the unavailability, due to inevitable natural inefficiency, of the intrinsic energy of a body of matter or radiation, for thermodynamic work that can be harnessed to do mechanical work outside the body"). The article has a long history of complaints about it being overly technical, and matters are only getting worse.

On the Talk page you will find several long sections on the RfC. If you wish to comment, perhaps start a new section if another editor has not already done so. Thank you for your time. -Jordgette [talk] 18:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Removing Data from Chalfont St PeterEdit

All data is sourced and refenced. Why the need to revert it? In future do not delete data.

Need guidanceEdit

Hi I'm Sumit banaphar, I want a little advice from you. I have been trying to make changes in Udal of Mahoba, Alha and Banaphar for almost a month. And if I know that what I am saying is correct then why am I having so much trouble. Whenever I try make changes in these pages with sources, i have to face some problems (like this source is not reliable or not clearly mentioning). I put a source in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and got some good response and an reviewer guide me to post this on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics for confirmation but I didn't got any response. So please guide me what to do now or what can I do. Sumit banaphar (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


2A02:C7F:143B:E300:0:0:0:0/64 is continuing to block evade with this range. I think we need to block this range

RNA vaccineEdit

Hi Materialscientist, you reverted a series of edits I made to RNA vaccine without explanation. I think I have done good work tidying up this page and making it understandable to read. I have also updated the refs and added good sources? What went wrong in your view? (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

thank you for that. (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!Edit

Thanks for helping me help User:Woinfosd by showing what he did wrong after I did.

16:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Well, on that note... Materialscientist, I think this revert of yours was in error; Woinfosd was trying to carry out an AfD nomination withdrawal, which seems justified at this point (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Peaceful Killing). Or are there other concerns I am not seeing? (And JTZegers, could you please hold off for the time being on dispensing advice to users that are "too inexperienced" because "a long time ago you were in their shoes"? You are going way too fast.) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Well in that case Elmidae, I'll just shut up until he actually has a question. I'm just trying to do my job. And A Peaceful Killing is just a stub. JTZegersSpeak
18:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Elmidae Is there a rule against giving people too much information? Is that the problem? JTZegersSpeak
21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

@JTZegers: no, that is not the problem. I don't intend to be mean, but before giving people good advice ostensibly from the depths of your own experience, it is a good idea to first acquire that experience. Or to put it another way, learn to walk before coaching others to run. I'd suggest spending several months doing hundreds or a thousand solid edits in mainspace before concentrating on guiding others. Otherwise neither they nor you may benefit from the experience :) (also let's not clutter up Materialscientist's talk page with this) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please delete the page immediatelyEdit

The 2021 U-17 women's world cup has been officially postponed to 2022 by fifa. So its necessary to move 2021 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup into 2022 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup. But Im unable to move the page as somebody already made some trouble with redirects and 2022 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup already exists. So please delete this or take necessary action to solve this issue. Shahoodu (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

RE:November 2020 Poprad (self-propelled anti-aircraft missile system)Edit

Hi, i remove that content, because there was an erroneous originalization regarding the 9K33 set, not the Poprad set. Yours faithfully user talk


Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film‎Edit

Can you get rid of that page top POV statement in Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film‎, too, please? I risk edit warring. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 14:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Undermining "The Azande People"Edit

Materialscientist and XLinkBot , You guys are overstepping and undermining us the Azande people right now by removing what we strongly believe are relevant to us. Please let's know if you know about us the Azande than we know about ourselves. Once again, below are genuine link to what we believe are relevant to our history not what was written by a Whiteman E.E. Evans Pritchard and other white people who doesn't even have knowledge of who are truly Azande

Please re-add back what we added and if you can't please stop reverting our article as you're just a contributor as we're. Thanks,

Azande Intellectuals— Preceding unsigned comment added by Azandeintellec (talkcontribs) 15:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

SKBM Degree CollegeEdit

Why you removed the eduts I did in SKBM Degree College Wikipedia page?

Why did you revert my edit. Minor refers to someone under the age of majority, anyone who uses it to refer to alcohol purchases is using the term incorrectly and being disrespectful to young adults.

Lily Gao is playing Ada Wong. Please research reference before reverting edits. Volaturus8 (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

HMD MotorsportsEdit

You un-did my edits for the HMD Motorsports page. I didn’t have any internet sources however I am apart of team and have part ownership. I am a physical source and the information you are putting on the wiki is incorrect. You are giving people wrong information and this is causing inferences in our business. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmalukas (talkcontribs) 17:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Please read WP:VERIFY. It can be summarised as "In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
I was able to apply a portion of the edits Davidmalukas requested with reliable sources. Esw01407 (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspicious IP editsEdit

Materialscientist, I ran across an edit by in one of the articles on my watchlist, and though it had been reverted, it was clearly problematic and they hadn't been warned. So I warned them. Then I took another look at their list of contributions, and checked a few that hadn't yet been reverted—unfortunately, as best I can tell, they've all been problematic, though I don't know enough about a number of them, since they're British television shows and I'm not British. I was wondering if you could take a look at the ones where they're still the most recent edit, and revert what needs reverting. If you think it's appropriate, then you may wish to issue a sterner warning or a block of some kind.. Thanks for taking a look. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC) has continued with the problematic edits; I've reverted a few more just now and put another template on their talk page. I'm not around as much to do monitoring; perhaps you can take a look and perhaps stop their trail of false information? It would be appreciated. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Donny BenétEdit

Materialscientist You keep reverting changes made to hide Donny Benét's name. There has been reasons given for privacy concerns yet you still revert back. Please do not reinstate.


Why do you do thisEdit

On October 13th 2020 you blocked me for a month and i am not very happy about that so why did you block me — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Add informationEdit

Hi, I want to add some information on one page but due to protection I can't add information on page so can you help to add information. PBChaudhari (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Use the article talk page to explain (a) what changes you want made, and (b) why these changes are a good idea.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Question about blockEdit

Hi Materialscientist, I notice that you blocked this IP after a level 1 warning. As far as I can see, the IP only made two edits and has a clean edit filter log. I guess I’m just curious as to why it was blocked so suddenly, or if I’m missing something. That’s all. Thanks Elmssuper 14:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for protecting BenétEdit

  The Anti-Flame Barnstar
Thank you for making sure relevant information stay present on the the Donny Benét page despite conflicts NicoARicoA (talk) 16:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblock requestEdit

Could you have a look at User talk:Spiderman8604 regarding an unblock request please? I tagged you yesterday, but I'd forgotten you don't have notifications switched on. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Unblocking is Ok with me. Materialscientist (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

My classmates vandalizing WikipediaEdit

Some third-grade numbskull at my school (Markham Elementary School) vandalized Randyland. Sorry. -- (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheckEdit

HI Materialscientist,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Repeated vandalism at Asha KhemkaEdit

Please could you look at the edits (vandalism-only) from Ephemeraljoy (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) which slipped-in unnoticed some Bio violations in September 2020, repeated from December 2018 and possibly also a 2017 IP address. I've manually reverted them (as I don't use any utility) and sent a level 2 with a clumsy heading, and also a lengthy message in January 2019. I only noticed as I saw you reverted other edits recently. Thx.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 20:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


Hello, Materialscientist. You have new messages at's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time. (talk) 20:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You removed the information that Hotel Bristol in Beirut shut down in 2020. I used firsthand the cite feature in the the user-friendly version. When it didn't work I added 2 minutes later in the oldfashioned way. I had radio france international as source, what is reliable enough. The source was on the page before you deleted it. You should wait a little bit before destroying information provided by other users, it may be the case that they are still in the editing process.

This editor oversteps their bounds. Adding an interview quote with source and it gets removed is ridiculous.

Anon IP edits on Eagles and Jaguars articlesEdit

I saw you reverted a few edits from the anonymous IP on the 2017 Philadelphia Eagles season and the 2020 Jacksonville Jaguars season. Going through their edit history I see a bunch of vandalism edits, most of which have been reverted and they've been constantly re-adding an edit in the Jaguars article despite my clearly explaining why the edit isn't necessary. I'm not familiar with how to ask for an edit block for IPs. Is that something you know how to do or at least point me in the right direction for? DragonFury (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Problem in block noticeEdit

You might want to fix this strange block notice. I would myself but I've never used a block notice before. NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 14:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Please see thisEdit

There is a lot of edit warring on these articles: Vankar Dhedh and these users have been acting like LTAs: User:Harpal Makhwana Please block them. a gd fan (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Disable user talk pageEdit

Please [12]. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Matthew brightEdit

He uses the name Bill Weiner for the movie tip toes, if you go to letterboxd and search Bill Weiner that's who credited for writing tiptoes which matthew bright actually wrote. Cterz (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

I made a section for thisEdit — WinnerWolf99 talkWhat did I break now? 21:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Block evader is backEdit

Hi Ms. As per this message above, they are back making similar edits to the same articles using the same edit summaries.

Edit summary example: previously blocked offender vs today's IP.

Same edit example:Todays IP vs a previously blocked editor.

I can give more diffs if needed. Could you check please. Robvanvee 05:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Response to your MessageEdit

Hi, I am responding to your message regarding my change on the NJT rolling stock page. I didnt exactly remove content but I relocated some things to a more appropriate location. I also added the quantity of a Locomotive that remains as well as the the F40s 4119-4120 to the active roster as they have recently re entered revenue service. I have since restored my edit but provided an edit summary explaining my actions. If there any further concerns, feel free to leave another message. (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Motherland Party (Azerbaijan)Edit

Dear Materialscientist,

I am still working on Motherland Party (Azerbaijan) page. The information that I have excluded was outdated, and I was almost adding new sections. I would like to apologize for not including the edit summary. Please contact me before reverting changes regarding the mentioned artice, since I am adding new details continuously. Thanks in advance --Burocan (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Please allow to publish.Edit

Why u blocked me..What is the problem sir with me? I want to tell you about the Rai Sahib .Which was posted as chief engineer .what should I do sir to publish my article..if you want to verify this history. So please allow to publish this🙏 n visit my place Wikiindiasurvey (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Sorry I didn't get this to you yesterday, but just wanted to say thanks for helping out with all those pesky vandals. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Iceland national football teamEdit

Right, I'm gonna go and try and fix that article but you have been extremely unhelpful in your reverts. Try looking at the article in question. The formatting is all off which is why people were removing that section. Dalitidlamadur (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khilieexodia17Edit

Hi Materialscientist. Can you take a look at the SPI? (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

You messaged me about a mistake that I didn't doEdit

You sent me a message about an edit on the Mr Bean page, but I didn't do this. You've got the wrong person, please don't bother me.


== November 2020 == [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/|your recent contributions]]—specifically <span class="plainlinks">[ this edit]</span> to [[:John Belushi]]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help desk]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 20:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Judith Jacklin Belushi Pisano is her name as stated elsewhere in the article. Thanks for watching me. I will revert. Please be familiar with the subject. (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Marist Red Foxes men's lacrosseEdit

  • Don't continue reverting this new page - else I will report you for harrassment !!!!!
  • user Materialscientist --- DO NOT CONTINUE TO REVERT THE ABOVE NEW PAGE,

ELSE I WILL REPORT YOU FOR HARRASSMENT - FAIR WARNING !!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Mr IP editor - instead of threatening people, why don't you improve the article by adding citations to support the various statements in it. See WP:VERIFY. This was what Materialscientist asked you to do.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Further to what Toddy1 has said, IP73, if you ignore the requests to supply reliable sources and instead decide to go down the reporting an editor in good standing rabbit hole, I recommend you acquaint yourself with this essay, it just might save you a whole lot of grief. - Nick Thorne talk 22:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Response to Arab-sign language family editEdit

Hello @Materialscientist:, I did remove one of the references for this article since I realised that two of the references were extremely similar, but I must've forgotten to write an edit summary. My apologies and thank you for letting me know. However, i did notice that the paragraph I wrote had been removed and did actually have one of the references cited. Is it because of the unexplained content removal? Thank you. Sapphire8765 (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

nat Turner page editEdit this article is a source to the change I have made.


U deleted my draft it wasn't advertising Nizar Abdullah Alsufi is a scientist who don't like fame man you don't give a shit i tried so hard to do this article and am actually a writer i know when its advertising or no you DON'T CARE man I traveled to get this information. He is famous in his country and will Wikipedia get alot of clicks.

Edits to Wenchang Spacecraft Launch SiteEdit

Hi Materialscientist, I'm writing you about my edits in Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site that you reverted earlier because you thought they were "not constructive". I tried to adapt that page to the standard for space launch sites' pages (e.g. Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1), so by replacing the preexistent "building infobox" with a more specific "launch pad infobox". By doing that, I also added some new information about the launch history of that launch site, as launch pads, number of launches, first/last launches and associated rockets. On the other hand, any information that was in the previous "building infobox" was inserted in the new infobox (as coordinates and location) or was already present in the page (chinese name of the launch site), so no information was lost through my modifications. In light of this, I think that my contribution is actually constructive, and it is my intention to restore my edits to that page. Please do not revert again it, or at least provide a more exhaustive justification because as I just explained, I tyhink that my contribution is anything but "not constructive". Fm3dici97 (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Salina, PennsylvaniaEdit

Hi, Material Scientist! I added three sentences to the Salina, PA article to make it clearer. I did not write the original article. I have lived in Westmoreland County, PA (where Salina is) for 32 years and am active in local historical groups, and so what I wrote was, in fact, correct. Thanks for checking on Wikipedia articles, I appreciate accuracy also. JIM PILLSBURY

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Consistent, unfair reject of page editsEdit

Hello, I do not agree with your rejection. I provide clear evidence in the comment box for every change I made. You are deliberately sabotaging this page and going against Wikipedia guidelines and conduct yourself. Wik2408 (talk) 12:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Wik2408 (talk) 12:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

That seems to be a theme with this user. He just reverted an edit I made which had clear sources listed, about a criminal case which is currently front page news and easily verifiable through additional sources including others not specifically referenced on this particular edit. (talk) 13:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Please can you check the Skegby page again, I have added the references in? Thank you DavidAshfield1


Air I edit this page of surwar only truth I belong from this royal family of surwar I know everything about that Please trust me sir. SURWAR rajwansh (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The User from Ben BreretonEdit

This user has been warned at least twice today before you warned him. he needs to be banned yet idk how to report him Damien Swann (talk) 10:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

An IssueEdit

I have recently reverted an edit AND disabled a reference on as there was a report stating that the link from Reference 6 led to a p#rn site and as such, I request that the reference stays down until the report is solved. I cannot check the report due to me being at work. Damien Swann (talk) 11:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent revert on Du-parsEdit


Concerning your premature revert of my edit on the article Du-par's (which I was still in the process of adding more sources), I believe that all of the additions that I made were sourced in the main part of the article at the time of the revert. What in particular are you having problems with? There are references listed in the article for all locations that were closed. The company's website list only one location. The Vegas casino website list their franchised location as open.

Here are (some) of the sources in the pre-existing article:

Please let me know what the particular problem is so I can fix it properly.

Thanks. -- (talk) 15:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for looking into my case. (BTW, I think you are doing a great job trying to removed unsourced material in other articles.) -- (talk) 15:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick action on User:Horn Again CocoEdit

"Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia" is an understatement. Disruptive, sexist, and offensive are just some of the words that come to mind. Anyhow, thanks for the quick action. Rklahn (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Block notice but no block?Edit

Hi Materialscientist. I see you left a block notice for Hamza sbid, but I don't see a block on their account [13]. Did you mean to block them, or was the block notice an error? Just wondered - thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Erroneous block (not signed in, blocked via IP)Edit

Good evening (or other time of day depending on your time zone), you have erroneously blocked me for "vandalism" for an edit that I didn't make to a page that I have never previously visited. My assumption is that the vandalizing user did so anonymously and happened to have the same IP. Please revise. (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Hello Your IP was blocked because whoever was using it at the time was editing disruptively, including edits which aren't visible to you because they were blocked by an anti-vandalism filter, however that block has expired and you are now able to edit (you were able to edit this page, for example). We recognize that IPs can be assigned to different end-users at different times, and that means that you may sometimes see messages which are not intended for you. Unfortunately, while we recognize that this may be inconvenient for you, it is sometimes necessary to ensure the smooth running of the project. If you use an internet provider that uses dynamic IP allocation (which is most of them) you can avoid messages meant for other users by creating an account and using it to edit. That's entirely optional, of course.
If I'm mistaken and you are still not able to edit, you may be autoblocked, in which case you will see instructions to appeal in the block message. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


Hello, Please block the user SHAM TRIVEDI (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) for repeated addition of contents with fake sources using multiple accounts on several articles. Check here [14] for his report from WP:SPI. Thanks Outlander07@talk 12:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Zebra KatzEdit

Please don't revert the edits made to the Zebra Katz Wikipedia page. The former page didn't acknowledge his rejection of queer rap - creating incorrect context around his work. --Jacobmcpherson (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Additionally, the former text included expired/inaccessible reference links --Jacobmcpherson (talk) 18:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Boyz (magazine)Edit

Hi! This [15] was a mistaken revert. Just thought I should let you know. (I'm not the IP that reverted your revert!) ◦ Trey Maturin 18:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Is this you?Edit

My guess is that you've done something to upset the IP who wrote this. Deb (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Festival of Great Britain & Northern IrelandEdit


I'm working for the Festival and just trying to change the page to reflect the correct wording as per the festival's website. I will add the citations later and would like to change the title of the page to reflect the correct name of the Festival. Is this possible?

Editing of Buddhism South Africa pageEdit

Hi Materialscientist. I am new to editing Wikipedia and I was simply trying to correct a website address on the Buddhism South Africa page [16] for the Diamond Way Buddhist Centre Cape Town. The website should be It seems you have reverted the entire section of the list with all the Buddhist Centres in South Africa (not just ours). I'm not sure what source I must provide to make sure this section is returned to the Buddhism South Africa page? What do we need to provide in order for this section to be returned and for our correct webpage to be displayed? This is in reference to your message: Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Buddhism in South Africa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC). [17]. Please help to restore this section and advise how to proceed. Thank you. HighestJoy (talk) 12:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Emmet G. SullivanEdit

Afternoon MS, I saw you reverted a change to Judge Sullivans page, I think we can expect some explicit BLP violations to keep rearing their head. A known Q crank is pushing his story through various sites.[18] What is the process for requesting BLP violation edits to be scrubbed btw?[19][20][21] Koncorde (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

RNA vaccineEdit

Hi Materialscientist, Can you re-look at my edit which you reverted on RNA vaccines? They are correct, referenced, and reflect the body. I am pretty familiar with the science here and tidied up several of the terminology and wording in this article. thanks. (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)


I wasn't sure if you had any comment about the unblock request of this user. 331dot (talk) 23:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Same issue againEdit

Hi again Ms. The same IP as my last 2 or 3 messages is back. The edit summaries are the give away as well as the same articles being edited. Could you take a look please. Robvanvee 06:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


Can you please block User:AidenPearce3131 from editing due to his username represents a well known person. Cupper52 (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Bahraich districtEdit

Look at this revert by the new user (possibly the same IP). The article needs to be protected in my opinion. Kindly see. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Another article, same addition of non-notable people [22] by the same IP/user. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Justine TungEdit

Hey, I see no reason why this should be removed as it is a valid Wikipedia article. (talk) 14:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Kindly dont revert edits at Bappa Rawal like u did before Please watch History of These Page before Reverting See Last stable version by Vif12vf few days Those were unsourced edits by Anonymous User. Kindly do use your mind. 2409:4051:4E93:5F27:1C95:253B:D57:8362 (talk) 09:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


Yoooo dont change it ShayanSarraf1905 (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

But How?Edit

But how I will do that on Buccaneers Schools ma'am. User:realdslaton (talk) 29 November 2020

Blocking User:Tanner Wolfe47Edit

Hi Materialscientist and thank you for the above block. Same material being spammed around by User:Natalie Fisher156 (I have opened SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tanner Wolfe47 JW 1961 Talk 13:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Source Family and Father YodEdit there is no article about the Source family, all of the content is about Father Yod.

Maximus DaiaEdit

I'd like to thank you for stepping in with the Maximus Daia article. The IP is editing in the habits of a disruptive editor, and has violated the WP:3RR. What should we do? Again, thanks for the help. Slykos (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Holier than thou?Edit

So you just went an undid a bunch of changes I made to the Wangolina wiki page. What makes you think those changes were wrong or weren’t justified? Where do you come from? Around here? I’ve lived here (Wangolina!) 7 generations on my mother’s side and 5 generations on my fathers. I think I know better than almost anyone what’s what when it comes to writing about Wangolina. Why do you think you know best? Mcbloke (talk) 11:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Mcbloke:, first of all you're complaining to the wrong person. You can find the userid of the person who reverted your edits at the Revision history tab at Wangolina, South Australia.
Secondly, I've examined the revert, and it was well-founded; I would have done the same thing. Please see Wikipedia's core policy of WP:Verifiability for a detailed explanation, but basically, all factual material you add to an article must be verifiable. The best way to assure this, is to add citations to reliable sources to the article while making your changes. Anything that is challenged, may be removed, which is what happened (correctly) in this case. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 11:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah well I’m just a yokel sheep and cow farmer, I don’t know how I got onto you mathglot. The fella who undid my update was called materialscientist or something. Anyway, as an outsider in this world I’m left bemused by my dalliance in it. I see some stuff on a page that I know is wrong, so I fix it, add a bit of colour and local knowledge, but I’m overruled by first some bloke in Russia who’s a wiki vigilante then you because some computer record somewhere has a bullshit entry, but is on a computer somewhere so even though it’s bullshit, it counts. Some muppet 100 years ago made a typo and now apparently the place is also known as wongolina? And the authority for it is some random computer entry? There are 3 families farming dirt in Wangolina, mine has been here since before south Australia was even proclaimed a state (OMG! How can that be?!!! Records don’t exist before 1836, ergo it cannot be possible people were here before then! Computer says no!) the other family has been here about 120 years and run the Wangolina winery and the newcomers have only been here since 1920. Yet because I can’t be arsed making a formal citation from some obscure local history book or family history, my really good local knowledge is ignored in favour of some Russian bot who pulls an erroneous and obscure source of the web, and voila! It becomes gospel. The irony for me is that in policing your verifiable facts the way you do, you’re actually the ones perverting history. I’d love you to verify who else calls it Wongolina; the only people who do are fuckwits who tell me it’s true coz they read it on Wikipedia! What do I know, I only live here. Mcbloke (talk) 13:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Citing SourcesEdit

Hello, thank you for informing me to cite sources and not remove content. I have now cited my sources.

Chris Krebs editEdit

Why did you restore the opinions of non-associates? More oftern than not, like yourself, these opinions are simple expressions from ignorant pieces of shit.

\ (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

What you say? Only one opinion matters: yours? I'll try not to be too harse because you're obviously in the 14 - 17 year old range but *everyone's* entitled to an opinion. You need to grow up!