The big yellow "you have new messages" banner was created for a reason. If you want my attention, edit this page. If I want your attention, I will edit your page. If I just want to reply out of politeness, I'll do it here and save interrupting whatever you're doing... if you're interested in what I said, watch this page and find out. If I'm keen to see your response, I will be watching your talk page, or wherever I suspect you might post it. But if you have something to say you think I need to read, the big yellow banner is kind of hard to miss...

Proposed deletion of File:MartinMAC250.jpgEdit

 

The file File:MartinMAC250.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:IRV eg 1.1.JPGEdit

 

The file File:IRV eg 1.1.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Are you still operating User:MelonBot/Member lists?Edit

If so could you run it for WikiProject Backpacking? —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

My song, "Tools"Edit

You just stay around to keep the tools, you just stay around to keep the tools! You think that we're all fools, you just stay around to keep the tools! Making minute edits every year, you make minute edits every year! We can see it's very clear, you make minute edits every year! Users such as yourself who make a significantly low amount of edits just to keep your administrative tools sicken me and many others. Just give up the tools already!!! What are you holding on to them for anyways!! What a selfish thing to do!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.35.97.209 (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

What a jolly ditty :p I'd agree that it would be selfish to deprive a more active user of the 'chance', if there were a limited number of mops to pass around. But since there is no such limit on bucket capacity, and that holding a mop is no big deal, I'm afraid I can't agree. I'm sorry that it makes you feel so strongly. FWIW, I fully intend to return to Wikipedia just as soon as my diet kicks off, ie very soon... :( Happymelon 19:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Yayyyyyyy --Izno (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
What tune should this be sung to? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Old peer reviews using manual archive namingEdit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Old peer reviews using manual archive naming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)