Help for blocking lt.wikipedia.orgEdit

Good evening, Mr. Adam Bishop, I wanted to ask you to help me in trouble Lithuanian Wikipedia. Behold, I got a little sick Tourette's syndrome, and sometimes I get angry and not in control of the words, and it happened there. I wrote a considerable criticism, and I told them back, "Bounce," and I was banned for 1 day. But then I was very curious, and I asked for all the details on Wikipedia, etc. And took me away, and to extend the blocking 8 months in. Then I began creating clones. But I continue to "excellent" edited by Wikipedia, in the articles, but then again I saw blocking the message, and angry. And I created the clone, created before 11, but anyway I edited, created 2 articles. (Because then I paid them not to develop). And then extend the blocking period of 3 years. And I very much want there the Wikipedia edited, so in every possible way I wanted to unlock. And I wrote in the e-mail, and everywhere, and tried to IRC, but not switched on, so in one word remained this situation. Then I created the English Wikipedia, and everything went well for me, I was invited to the "Teahouse" be paradise! And here all the other people do not like the Lithuanians, they are stubborn and wrong. And here I created, I do not remember any of their regions, many villages, perhaps 5 villages, 2 rivers, 1 lake. Maybe you can help in any way? Plus I created yesterday again Lithuanian Wikipedia account, I wrote what I do is, I opened my heart, and today still went and blocked User: Homo ergaster. And I do not know what to do. And I want and there and then edit the articles, maybe here I will become administrator ever. So HERE is hopeful. Thank you. P.S if you look at those who blocked me: Homo ergaster, and my account Lukas_GamingLT   --L.ukas lt 13 --Talk 15:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13

Disambiguation link notification for January 17Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raoul of Merencourt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blanche of Navarre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Catholic-Hierarchy.orgEdit

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [1]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Counterstrike (drum and bass group)Edit

Hi, just letting you know that the above article has been prodded, as the prodder didn't bother.146.90.6.53 (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Florentine listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Florentine. Since you had some involvement with the Florentine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!Edit

  Hi Adam! I'm a new user and I would give a special thing for you! Here's a cookie. Aldrianyf (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Re "The Assassins"Edit

Sir, I see that you are an authority. Thank you for your kind, well informed rejection of my proposal. Would you, if not inconvenient please supply me with a source for your correction of my error. Preferably an original text and not a later commentary. Thanks again and never mind Heidi! This is a worthy institution in an unworthy general populace.SBader (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Metal (music)Edit

Hello Adam Bishop,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Metal (music) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Request your views on an article nominated for deletionEdit

I'd request you to state your vote on [[2]] article for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.216.113 (talk) 11:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Roman And Byzantine Military HistoryEdit

Hello I currently have a project known as the Roman and Byzantine military history page Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman and Byzantine Military History, I was wondering if you would like to join, as you have shown interest in the byzantine empire. Iazyges (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Jonathan Riley-SmithEdit

http://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/news/029-professor-jonathan-riley-smith-1938-2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siriaeve (talkcontribs) 20:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Adam Bishop (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator electionEdit

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protectionEdit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for adminsEdit

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page PatrollersEdit

Hi Adam Bishop.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

bacon/napkinEdit

Hello Mr. Bishop! Do you pronounce the word bacon as [ˈbeɪkən], but the word napkin as [ˈnæpkɪn]? 206.180.244.235 (talk) 03:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia!Edit

  Happy Saturnalia
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

TrolleeEdit

Re special:diff/574897779 I found a reference listing Nissae Isen (just made a page!) as a principal cast member and she also got an award nomination for MtK so I think you're probably right.

If we can't find any online sources confirming this then I think we could cite an episode directly, in which case I'd need to figure out the first episode Trolee appeared in. Although I'm limiting to checking whatever's either Treehouse On Demand or else checking upcoming showtimes.

There isn't a cast section for MtK and since there's a Canada/UK version, putting together a table would probably help let us know where we're missing actors. Ranze (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!Edit

   
 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017Edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

  Administrator changes

  NinjaRobotPirateSchwede66K6kaEaldgythFerretCyberpower678Mz7PrimefacDodger67
  BriangottsJeremyABU Rob13

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

  Arbitration

  Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 15 years ago...Edit

  Hey, Adam Bishop. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Lepricavark (talk) 02:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 

March Madness 2017Edit

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

House of IbelinEdit

Hello Adam
Thanks for your edit here the other day; I think the original hatnote was actually referring to a similar-sounding place in the Galilee, rather than the town now at the site where Ibelin was. It's pretty academic now, though, and it isn't necessary on a genealogy page (I've added the previous link to the dab page already) so I've removed it altogether.
I gather from your comments you added the family tree; is it worth putting lines in (like here)? I don't know if that'd make it easier or harder to read. What do you think? Moonraker12 (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your note: I'm not sure what's best to do, so I have left some suggestions on the talk page there. if there are no objections I'll have a go at it in a while. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

TranslationEdit

Greetings. Could you give me a quick translation about this French interview? No need for an identical translation but just a small overview. Anyways, regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

About vandalism on the article of Presidential Elections in Iran 2017Edit

Good evening Sir, I allow myself to report a persistent vandalism actions about a non user called Pahlevun (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) on the article about Iranian Presidential elections that censures informations about declared candidates without real reasons and even the information is verifiable and official.

This person has been warned and each time allows itself to delete only one declared candidate "Dr Hossein Homayoun Fard" who's official candidate at this election and who officially is registered under official institutions of Iran. So he has the right to be included as the other candidates on this article and "Pahlevun" erases his name when the article is updated.

Can it be possible to block his capacity of intervention on this article which is an information one and not a political tribune ?

I'm new on Wikipedia and I have many things to learn. And forgive my errors in english and also my errors in the form of writing also. (I'm not even english speaker at the base). Thanks as advance. Best regards. --TheSimorgh (talk) 12:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@TheSimorgh: You have not provided a single reliable source that says he has done so. Verifiability is the Wikipedia policy you are ignoring and I will revert you every time you add it with no proper source. Stop labling me and edit warring. Pahlevun (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Pahlevun (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) you're censuring public information about an election. Are you working for any public administration in relation with the elections to decide who must be in the list of candidates or not ? Are you up the Iranian Government who received Dr Homayoun Fard candidature by the way of Iranian Embassy in France in all respectful and legal forms ? You don't have any wright to censure information. Your interventions are censure and vandalism not more not less. I'll make changes each time you'll change it too. And contrary to what you're talking information is verifiable by the links I've put. First, the public anounce by the website of Ayyaran Group. Second, I give the link of Iranian Embassy in France that can confirm that Dr Hossein Homayoun Fard is officially candidate. So if you're more important source than Iranian Government I'm very curious. You're actions are violating ethics of Wikipedia. My informations are linked with official sources. If it disturbs you that shows that you're doing politic filtering and it's vandalism. I won't stop warning you and won't stop modify the article each time you'll modify it. I have time and you'll be tired before me count on it. I'm for freedom of expression and freedom of information what you're not and sensibly !. --TheSimorgh (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikimania 2017 in MontréalEdit

 
Wikimania 2017

This year, Wikimania is happening in Montréal, from August 11 to 13, and for the Hackathon and the Sourcethon, from August 9 to 10!

I see that you are involved with the Canada chapter of Wikimedia. Do you want to participate in the Wikimania in the front row?

You want to give us a hand? We need YOU as a volunteer!

Contact Antoine2711 at abeaubien@wikimedia.ca.

Come make a difference with a great team of passionate Wiki people.

--Antoine2711 (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Pastoralis praeminentiæ listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

I have nominated the redirect Pastoralis praeminentiæ for deletion. Since you created that redirect in 2007, you may want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sideways713 (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Latin helpEdit

Adam, if you have a moment could you check my translation/interpretation of the following passage? It is from document no. 50 in this collection.

Hoc autem donum facimus ob remissionem peccatorum nostrorum, videlicet mei Petri Assur et coniugis mee Elo, seu pro anima comitis Ermengaudi, qui in castro Gerb mortuus est, et pro anima filii sui, qui sepultus est Celsone, et uxoris sue Marie, et istius pueri Ermengaudi minoris, quatenus Orbis Factor tribuat ei victoriam super paganos.

which I translate as

This gift we make for the remission of our sins, namely Pedro Ansúrez and my wife Elo, and for the soul of Count Ermengol, who died in the castle of Gerb, and for the soul of his son, who is buried in Solsona, and his wife María, and this boy Ermengol the younger, that the Maker of the World give him victory over the pagans.

The main reason I am asking is that I want to be sure that there are three generations here: Ermengol who died in Gerb, his unnamed son, his unnamed sons's wife María and Ermengol the younger (who would be unnamed and María's son). It seems odd that they would not name the intervening son (who would be Ermengol V of Urgell, husband of María, Pedro's daughter). Is it saying that Count Ermengol had a son buried in Solsona and a daughter-in-law named María? Thanks, Srnec (talk) 23:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Srnec, yes, that's correct - just some grammatical points, "quatenus" is a medieval way of saying "ut", so they're making the gift "so that the Maker of the World may grant" etc. "Istius pueri" must mean "their son", with the relationship that you mentioned (i.e. Ermengol the younger is the son of Maria and the unnamed son of Ermengol the elder). "Iste" is a weird word to use there though.It could also mean that Ermengol the younger is Maria's son from another man, or more likely since they share a name, Ermengol the elder's son's son with another woman...but I might be reading too much into it! It is as you say, three generations. Adam Bishop (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I was wondering what work "istius" was doing. I found it odd that the charter avoids naming Ermengol V, although it twice mentions Ermengol IV and his death at Gerb and has no problem naming María or Ermengol VI. Maybe Pedro did not like his son-in-law. Srnec (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Viacom listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Viacom. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Viacom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Silicon Graphics listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Silicon Graphics. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Silicon Graphics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Novell listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Novell. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Novell redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Borland International listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Borland International. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Borland International redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Inc. Apple Computer listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inc. Apple Computer. Since you had some involvement with the Inc. Apple Computer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!Edit

Hello Adam. Many thanks for your scholarly and comprehensive reply to my question at the Reference Desk regarding multiple versions of the Latin word for square. Your help is much appreciated. Dolphin (t) 21:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome! Adam Bishop (talk) 23:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Article requestEdit

Would you be willing to create an article on Kitty, a Fair But Frozen Maid? There appears to be decent sourcing at fr:Kitty, a Fair But Frozen Maid, so I suppose you could just translate the content. Nyttend backup (talk) 16:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

It looks like it would be simple enough to translate. I will try to do so if I can find the time! Adam Bishop (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Nationalistic edits?Edit

May you evalute the behaviour of this user[3]? He seems biased by nationalistc POVs. He has previous warnings? May show me the proper place for this kind of problems, in eng-wikipedia? Thank you. --Rosso Veneziano (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator electionEdit

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

<blush>Edit

...Adam B., did you actually peek at my browser history, or am I that obvious? You totally nailed my work process on that French:English query on the RD/L. Your reply gets top marks for style and content, and you're evidently too much of a gentleman to have clicked on the Wikidata links I provided and scoop me on the en & fr corrections of label/description/alias. I've hastened to do so myself - Wikidata is hugely forgiving in providing laconic edit summaries, so it's all good. </blush> Are you supporting the continuance of the RDs? I've always figured I'm - intermittently, at least - on the sunny side of the signal:noise ratio, in that with most of my queries I'm honestly trying to improve an article or item, and I'd like to think it matters to a wider readership out there. I'm curious to read the discussion but admit I'm apprehensive. No matter what, it's always reassuring to read your contributions and know there are those who make Wikipedia (and so, the world) a better place. -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 11:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't realize it was you who translated it :) Working as a translator and proofreader makes it easier to recognize patterns of thinking in other people when they are translating. I didn't have a chance to check the edit summaries on Wikidata, but WordReference is one of my primary dictionaries in my job, so I know its quirks!
I'm very much pro-RD. I know we have collaborated on improving, and even creating, articles based on Reference Desk questions on several occasions in the past, so the Desks are clearly useful. I wouldn't bother reading the discussions, since nothing will come of them. My suggestion is to ban certain users from the Reference Desks, which in my opinion would solve all of the problems, but I know that won't happen either. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and votingEdit

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Saturnalia!Edit

  Happy Saturnalia
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free and you not often get distracted by dice-playing. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military HistoriansEdit

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

You've got mailEdit

 
Hello, Adam Bishop. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please refrain from gang formation and edit-terrorism on InternetEdit

You're involved in edit-terrorism on the article Seventh Crusade. Please spare Wikipedia of Fundamentalist and extremist propaganda. Please refrain from edit terrorism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:2395:27F6:0:0:25E1:88AC (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Refrain from Christian fundamentalism and extremism and spreading edit terrorism.Edit

The correct explanation of Christian religious Fundamentalist wars imposed on Muslims have been given for sake of better understanding and awareness. Please do not engage in edit terrorism. Please do not spread edit terrorism on Internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:239A:C03A:0:0:2057:70AC (talk) 10:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Treaty of UtrechEdit

I added information about the Treaty of Utrech https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tratado_de_Utrecht The Party on "the case of the Catalans" on the page on the treaty in English. you delete my contribution That has many historical proofs and is true. Why did he do it? Does he not want the truth to be known? Do not you want the whole world to know that Catalonia is part of Spain because it lost a war because the united kingdom abandoned it?

Regards. Sylas (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog DriveEdit

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey InviteEdit

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_bwuctROKiuEO1AV&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

A little help with LatinEdit

Hi @Adam Bishop:,, I have created a personal user award for contributions related to ancient Roman history. I have dubbed it "the Barnstar of Tacitus". Could you review my translation: "stella horreorum Taciti" Thanks. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @InformationvsInjustice:, I guess that would be the very literal translation! I notice that other Wikipedias don't necessary call these "barnstars" but have another word referring to another kind of reward. I bet the Taberna on the Latin Wikipedia could come up with something more appropriate. You can ask questions in English there. Adam Bishop (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Ancient GreeceEdit

Given your experience with the classics, would you mind participating at a CFD? I've noticed that many of our categories use "Ancient Greece" non-initially, and many others use "ancient Greece", so Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 July 5#Ancient Greece is an attempt to gain consensus for one or the other. So far I've gotten only two other participants, so it would help if you could offer an opinion. Nyttend (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Another Latin questionEdit

Salve amice,

Aiutum! I am struggling with the difference between evocare and devocare, evoco and devoco. I understand evoco to mean to summon, or lure. An evocatio was a ritual designed to "distract" a city's gods by a besieging army. But I find in Pliny's Natural Histories XXVIII ch.4, devocare is used for summoning Jupiter. Are the two interchangeable?

Evocatus is a veteran heeding the call to return to duty. So what would a devocatus be?

If you can help, awesome, don't feel obliged to respond if you can't :-) Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 04:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

They do seem to have similar meanings that could be interchangeable. They are both something like "call forth" or "call out", so it would be easy for the meanings to converge. "Devocatus" is a possible word but it doesn't seem to be a regular noun, just the past participle of devocare. The same thing happens with other words that can take de- or ex- as a prefix, like "deferro" and "effero", both mean bring/take/take away/take out etc. It does't always work though, sometimes they are the opposite! Like deficio and efficio. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openEdit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

CFD noticeEdit

Hello, because you participated in one or both of the CFD nominations for "Ancient Greece" in July, I wanted you to know that I've created a second nomination for Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 1#Ancient, and thank you for contributing to the discussion. Nyttend (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedEdit

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedEdit

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

House of Ibelin, againEdit

Hello Adam
I finally got round to doing something about this; I thought I'd better let you know. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your note; looking at it again, I think the Lusignans were the main problem (being so many of them, but not male-line descendants). I'm wondering, though, whether it's worth copying the Lusignans there to the HoL page as well. What do you think? Moonraker12 (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Have your say!Edit

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to provide consultancyEdit

Hi Adam Bishop,

I'm inviting admins to join our team at parli.co providing advice on how to build and manage a collaborative website. Parli.co is an emerging project aiming at building a sort of Wikipedia of arguments around controversial topics (more info here). Part of our budget will be destined to such consultancy work, and we think we could benefit from the experience of Wikipedia janitors and admins. Feel free to message me back with interest and questions. --isacdaavid 22:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

A brownie for you!Edit

  Hello there im new here and i wanted to say hi!!

I would like some advice if possible please. Vivian the creppypasta (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!Edit

  For the sheer laugh out loud experience of your user page. Droll, very droll. Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Robert of NantesEdit

 On 28 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert of Nantes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert of Nantes was "an old and venerable man aged eighty years" when he was imprisoned along with Louis IX of France during the Seventh Crusade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert of Nantes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert of Nantes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Hockey League arenas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

List Of Programs Broadcast By Treehouse TVEdit

Hi,

I noticed your post in the Talk section of List of programs broadcast by Treehouse TV. I have removed several fake ones (an IP Address keeps putting them back plus someone has been adding shows that don't have an article and when you search them on Google it will link to someone's YouTube account with shows not appropriate for preschoolers. I will try to keep an eye on the article; this is one of the few articles I will try to keep up to date.

I just decided to let you know that someone is going to try to keep an eye on the article; I also requested for page protection. TheBlackKitty (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! That's excellent work. I've been trying to keep an eye on it over the years, but now that my own children are too old for Treehouse, I have no idea what is real or not these days. Adam Bishop (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


You're welcome! I'll just check the official website to see what is still airing. TheBlackKitty (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Going "oh...!"Edit

Who would go "oh...!" and smile politely if he or she gets a chance to learn something about the legal system in the early Crusader kingdoms? I'm flabbergasted! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Oh, mostly family, non-academic friends...even academic friends sometimes...but you're right, it makes no sense! Who wouldn't want to learn about that? Adam Bishop (talk) 20:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I've had similar experiences when talking about the difference between undecidable and semi-decidable, or between primitive recursion and μ-recursion. Apparently, most people are weird. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Adam Bishop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Could you please guide me with some helpEdit

Hi ::@Adam Bishop: I am sorry for disturbing you. I was hoping If you could help me out with wikiedu.org. I am new to wikiedu.org Will that be possible. If not can you recommend an Instructor who could help me. (Purplecart (talk) 10:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC))

A kitten for you!Edit

FOR BEING AROUND SO LONG :D

Am149072 (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!Edit

You are welcome :D

Am149072 (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awardsEdit

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awardsEdit

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy SaturnaliaEdit

  Happy Saturnalia
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Felicem Saturnaliam! Adam Bishop (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

VicipaediaEdit

Hi, Adam. Happy January. We need you at Vicipaedia ... always, of course, but especially just right now if you are able to make la:Usor:UV our interface administrator. See the latest discussion (a good consensus) at the la:Vicipaedia:Taberna. Thank you! Andrew Dalby 08:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!Edit

  I have a question as you are a professional historian, a lot of drama being going on at the balkans. What is your opinion about the macedonian name dispute and what do you think about the ancient Macedonian civilization, is Macedonia the descedants, is Greece? Or none of them. (If you have some knowledge of the dispute) Δημήτρηss (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Draughtsman listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draughtsman. Since you had some involvement with the Draughtsman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpinningSpark 09:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

New mailing list for Wikimedia CanadaEdit

Good day all, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [4]. To send messages to the list, write to general {{subst:Afd top}} discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Please listen to this song I wrote.Edit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2vFnyiq2RY — Preceding unsigned comment added by YeahItsJosh (talkcontribs) 16:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circularEdit

 
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)Edit

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


Invitation to join the Fifteen Year SocietyEdit

Dear Adam Bishop,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


S.O.SEdit

Good morning.

I contact you because I was banned from modifications on the French Wikipedia ! You'd like to know why ? Because I deleted the discussions on my own page and I put in the Infobox the flags of countries and cities, states, counties ... Some French administrators decided that it was forbidden or not recommended... Then Gemini1980 banned me... I find it unacceptable, this person uses his "power" and his fellow administrators too. I can not do anything against this. What should I do ? What can you do ?

Sincerely TH2M8S aka THOMAS TH2M8S (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Thomas, unfortunately there is nothing I can do. I'm not an administrator on the French Wikipedia, which has its own rules. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Connection to Gerberga of Saxony/ Reversal of my edits on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree articleEdit

Hello,

I just want to let you know I strongly disagree with your reversal of my edits on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree article and have therefore reverted it again. You can find my arguments on the talk page of the article, if you still disagree with my edits please let know (by presenting your arguments to why you think so). Thank you for your attention.

With kind regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 03:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I replied to your message on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree talk page, I would be grateful if you would be so kind as to read the arguments I have written and reply to them individually and explain to me exactly why you are opposing my edit.

Best regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

P.S.: I explained why I think it is a different situation when it comes to Baldwin II's article. I am not trying to engage in any disruptive behaviors, I simply want to have a debate over this. If you could explain to me how you oppose my edit (by addressing my arguments individually) I would be satisfied. Thank you very much for your attention,

Best regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, thank you so much for taking the time to reply to my messages on the Kings of Jerusalem family tree talk page, that is virtually all that I wanted. I replied to your remarks on the aforementioned talk page, I would be grateful if you could please take a look on it. Thank you again for your attention and consideration.

With kind regards,

Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Armstrong, Louis Satchmo listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Armstrong, Louis Satchmo. Since you had some involvement with the Armstrong, Louis Satchmo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

"Echo Sounding" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Echo Sounding. Since you had some involvement with the Echo Sounding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Dawnseeker2000 17:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Backlog BanzaiEdit

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openEdit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedEdit

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way markEdit

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

"Political Scientist" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political Scientist. Since you had some involvement with the Political Scientist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. From UnnamedUser (open talk page) 04:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Io Saturnalia!Edit

  Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

We need you at VicipaediaEdit

Hi Adam. Happy 2020. We have elected three new magistratus, la:Usor:Giorno2, la:Usor:Sigur, la:Usor:Andreas Raether. You can see the election results at la:Vicipaedia:Petitio magistratus. I hope you can give admin rights to these three for us -- thank you! I should add that Andreas Raether hasn't yet responded where it says "Responsum usoris Andreae Raether:". I have reminded him, no doubt he will do it any moment, and if you wait until he actually has done it you will be in fullest accord with the rules. Andrew Dalby 19:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

He's written a word or two. All three elections are complete now, nemine still contradicente. Andrew Dalby 10:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Factum est! I hope I did everything correctly (it's a pretty simple procedure, but I always have to re-learn how to do it each time!). Adam Bishop (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

De grapheocratis in Vicipaedia LatinaEdit

Salve, Adam! Grapheocratam secundum in Vicipaedia Latina elegimus (videas hanc paginam et tabernam). Nemo nisi tu nos iuvare potest! Demetrius Talpa (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that they elected a second grapheocrates. Doesn't mean you're not needed, as demonstrated by the fact that I'm currently under several doctors, hence sometimes absent from Vicipaedia. I intend to emerge, however. Andrew Dalby 09:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
No, I don't mind at all - I'm not very active on Wikipedia lately, in any language, so it's better if there's two of us! Adam Bishop (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Another thingEdit

Hi Adam,

I noticed that you were one of the earliest to edit Jawaharlal Nehru's Wikipedia page. Since you are one of the earliest editors at Wikipedia, I wanted to get your opinion about the notability of Sharjeel Imam whose Wikipedia page I created recently but then that got deleted. I believe it would be easy to find 50 or even 100 news citations for him. It is related to India's ongoing anti-CAA protests. He can be compared to a few young students who became famous in the U.S. in the wake of one school mass shooting. I think this one was in Florida and one of the students is named David Hogg though he is not in the 'news' much these days and therefore the name escapes me. I would love it if you could put in a word on the deletion discussion or send a word to the Admin who deleted the Sharjeel Imam page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachi bbsr (talkcontribs) 17:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!Edit

March Madness 2020Edit

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

List of your created articles that are in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errorsEdit

I'm trying to make a dent in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, and a few articles you created have issues that I can't fix on my own. Basically, some refs linked via {{sfn}} and {{harvnb}} and similar have missing full citations or have some other problems. You can check these instructions to have error messages enabled (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup).

The following articles could use some of your attention

If you could add the full references to those article, that would be great. Again, the easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

... totam devastans Moraviam preter castra et loca munita.Edit

Could you translate this clause? I think I know what it means, but it does not jive with how I read an author's footnote. So perhaps I don't know enough about 13th-century uses of praeter. Or the footnote is confusing. Thanks, Srnec (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! It all makes sense. Mongols indeed. Srnec (talk) 02:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Could you determine the age of this illustrationEdit

Hello. I have noticed that the art style of this illustration is not even remotely similar to other medieval art: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dame_guiraude_supplice.jpg

The foreshortening and other aspects of the artwork make it seem to be more like modern fantasy art than anything else. I don't speak French, but the text seems to be modern French. I know next to nothing about paleography, but even the handwriting seems to be modern.

But, the file itself is classified as being in the common domain due to age. I very much doubt it.

I didn't know where to bring this up, so I found a list of people who said that they're professional historians, I started from the top of the list, and I found that you're active. Maybe there is a better place to ask. BirdValiant (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openEdit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commencedEdit

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)