Please check www.archive.org for copies before marking links as dead. 212.84.104.73 (talk) 14:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2009Edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ely, England, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ely, England was changed by 82.1.62.101 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-05-17T22:49:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


SafetyEdit

No. --wL<speak·check> 23:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

That's one of the reasons I like Wikipedia - everyone is soooo friendly. You couldn't possibly deign to give a reason, I suppose?

September 2009Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chester City, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Children in Need, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. magnius (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jumbo jets vs. wide-bodied aircraftEdit

I assume you're aware that these terms are not interchangeable in all contexts?

Is a Boeing 767 a jumbo? (Not to most people, but it is wide-bodied.) An Airbus A300? (Same thing.)

Also, when a source uses the term "jumbo jet", but does not specify which one, you can't make the assumption for them—that would be original research.

Please exercise great caution when you adjust these terms—a lot of your recent edits are questionable. TheFeds 06:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

You should also be aware that in colloquial usage, or in contexts where no specific aircraft is identified, it is often incorrect to request disambiguation—because these things are references to "jumbo jets" (as in, large aircraft), not "Boeing 747s" (the archetypal jumbo jet). TheFeds 06:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kiddie rides has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheFeds 06:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Cargo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. TheFeds 06:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe not vandalism, exactly, but certainly unconstructive. As I wrote in the edit summary for that last instance: "Disambiguation is not needed: two types of very large aircraft are specified in the previous sentence. "Such aircraft" means them." Use {{dn}} appropriately!
Some of your other edits (regarding jumbo jets) have been fine, but there are several questionable ones like this. TheFeds 06:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Piping correct linksEdit

Good job with clean ups like with Sikorsky Aircraft here. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009Edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Signal-averaged electrocardiogram do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 02:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010Edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TWA_Flight_800&diff=337101054&oldid=337086670

82,1.62.101, all of this information is important and encyclopedic. The point is to show that one hotel became the nerve center of the media circus gathering around a very high profile case.

WhisperToMe (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

2008 Farnborough plane crashEdit

Thanks for going through the article and highlighting the dead links. Linkrot is a perennial problem with Wikipedia. If you do find a dead link, you could try to find an alternative source for the info. I've managed to do so in almost every case here, and the small amount of info I couldn't find a ref for wasn't overly important, so it has been deleted without any detraction from the article. Best, Mjroots (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

BA038Edit

Re your removals, it would be a better idea to ensure that any uncited statements are referenced. There should be plenty of sources available to do this. Mjroots (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Table editsEdit

As you can see by this diff, when you move tables vertically in the same edit as changing internals it makes it tough to see what you've done. Please try to make these as two separate edits. Thanks, User:LeadSongDog come howl 20:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)