Draft:Lost RomanceEdit

You draftified this article and tagged it with various concerns including conflict of interest. Did you have that concern about any particular editor, or more than one of them, or in general? I think it has been resubmitted too quickly, and I am reasonably certain that I will decline it shortly, probably before you have a chance to answer me, but I want to be able to take another look at it then. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Hi Robert McClenon, thanks for getting in touch. Wow, there has been a flurry of activity on this article in the 24 hours since I looked at it!

    The COI concern was mostly regarding the editor InKyo.O2 due to their recent history. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 06:36, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

    • Two of the accounts are now blocked for sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
      • Ahh, I thought something smelled off. Thanks for your efforts in creating the SPI. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

rejectionEdit

not addressing the problems in the previous review, as with Draft:Francisco Villar Liebana is not a reason for rejection-- rejection depends on the contents of the draft, not the manner of submission. The normal practice is that after 2 or 3 such resubmissions, to take the draft to MfD. But in this case, there were no substantial problems with the draft at the previous reviews, so it shouldn't have been declined in the first place. I fixed the refs to clarify the sourcing for the bio part and accepted. DGG ( talk ) 05:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft UArchitects COIEdit

Dear 1292simon

Thank you for your feedback on the Uarchitects Draft. Draft:UArchitects I'm a architecture student, and I'm particularly interested in Dutch architecture and Dutch architectural offices . For this reason i started writing this page with no conflict of interest. I hope i can continue edditing in the feedback i have recieved from you on 14 November 2020

Kind regards, --Meimaar.93 (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

DELETION REVIEWEdit

Deletion review for Cardumen CapitalEdit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cardumen Capital. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Your move of Central Cee to draftspace.Edit

Hi User:MrsSnoozyTurtle, I noticed you moved an article I created to draftspace and tagged it with multiple issue templates, including COI and reading like a press release. I am not some super experienced user on Wikipedia but I will stand my ground and contest the taggings as the page does not read like a 'press release' nor a news article. Neither does it fail WP:MUSICBIO. Please read WP:MUSICBIO before tagging, especially criteria 2 which states Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart., of which Central Cee has, on his song loading which I will cited in the article and you removed Official Charts citations claiming they are not a reliable source, Official charts website is not listed at :Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources and as far as I'm aware its reliability has never been contested. Therefore, the article passes WP:MUSICBIO, does not read like a news source and I'm certanly not affiliated with the subject. Please be careful tagging pages and moving them as if your actions affect an admin negativly then you'll wish you read the policies. Finally, I've moved the page back to article space and restored the reliable references and content. Thanks, --Pulisi (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

  • Hi Pulisi. Thank you for clarifying that there is no COI issue here. Some of your claims are not correct and I do not agree that the Apple Music listings for the albums that you restored are WP:RS. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)