Welcome!

Hello, حسن علي البط, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Help with dermatology-related contentEdit

I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our Bolognia push!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

SabbagEdit

What dores the arabic word Sabbag means? It's my last name, and I don't know what it means. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoofyG (talkcontribs) 00:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

WelcomeEdit

Hi there, and welcome to the English Wikipedia. I notice you have quite an interest in Chemistry-related content; perhaps you would like to drop by the Wikiprojects Chemicals and Chemistry to meet like-minded people? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

HiEdit

Nice work, in general, with your recategorizations. Be careful with Category:Organochloride insecticides, though. Just because something is an insecticide and an organochloride, that doesn't mean it's an "organochloride insecticide". That term has traditionally been reserved for insecticides like DDT, Lindane, and Cyclodienes which lack reactive functionality and tend to persist in the environment. Yilloslime TC 07:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

CarefulEdit

I assume this was a mistake, yes? DS (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:PyrazolodiazepineEdit

I have nominated Category:Pyrazolodiazepine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Peace on who follows the truth. I am not with you in deleting the category:Pyrazolodiazepines. I made this category without respect to the pharmacological effect. Thanks alot. --حسن علي البط 14:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

CategoriesEdit

Good work on adding categories to the various chemical articles, keep it up. Cheers, C6541 (TC) 21:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Biguanides categoryEdit

I disagree with the classification of category:Biguanides as category:Anti-diabetic drugs and hence the removal of the latter category from Metformin and others. This is conflating the structural aspect of the compound (it is a biguanide) with the medical usage (anti-diabetic drug). Compounds within the same structural family of drugs will not all share the same medical properties (or if they do, share them to different degrees) and hence will not all be used for the same purpose. I request you remove the category:Anti-diabetic drugs from category:Biguanides and restore the category:Anti-diabetic drugs to the relevant drugs having that indication. Colin°Talk 09:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:Policyclic organic compoundsEdit

If you think that Category:Policyclic organic compounds is misnamed, please don't empty it out of process. In stead:

  1. Add a {{subst:cfr|Polycyclic organic compounds}} to Category:Policyclic organic compounds.
  2. Add the following line to the page you get to from this link, replacing the text "Your reason(s) for the proposed rename" with your reason for renaming the category.:
{{subst:Cfr2|Policyclic organic compounds|Polycyclic organic compounds|text='''Rename'''. Your reason(s) for the proposed rename. ~~~~}}

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Help:Translate to ArabicEdit

Hello! I need some help on translation. Please translate the following word to Arabic.

  • Bishop of Rome
  • Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
  • Patriarch of Alexandria
  • Patriarch of Antioch
  • Patriarch of Jerusalem
  • Bishopric of Rome
  • Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
  • Patriarchate of Alexandria
  • Patriarchate of Antioch
  • Patriarchate of Jerusalem

Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 16:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Dicobalt edetateEdit

Hi there

Thanks for your work categorizing compounds. I've reverted your change for this article because it is a coordination compound, not an organometallic (or organocobalt) compound. Organometallic compounds require at least one M-C bond, or are involved in forming such bonds in its applications. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Organoaluminium compoundsEdit

Thank you for all the categorization of chemical compounds that you have been doing. I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted a bunch of your edits related to category:organoaluminium compounds. That category should only be for compounds that have a carbon-aluminium bond, not necessarily every organic compound that contains an aluminium atom. (The same is true for other organometallic categories, too.) -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Happy birthday!Edit

Happy birthday and thank you for all your categorizations! Best wishes, Nirmos (talk) 21:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RobotyEdit

Hi there.

I'm hoping you might be able to help, re. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roboty - most of the references are in Arabic, and I'm not sure if it meets the notability criteria or not, and if they are appropriate reliable sources.

I'd really appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  23:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your UsernameEdit

Your Username is in a different language!--71.80.52.67 (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Overspecialized categoriesEdit

I notice that you have created many categories for chemical compounds that are so overspecialized that they contain only 1 or 2 articles and are unlikely to ever contain more. This is generally considered unhelpful. Before creating any more categories for chemical compounds, please get consensus for doing so at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I am concerned that your continuing efforts to create overspecialized categories has become disruptive. Could you please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemicals#More_overspecialized_categories? Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Please check out Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. I also oppose your categorization efforts. In my opinion, despite your good intentions, this activity of yours is unhelpful (i.e. damaging).--Smokefoot (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
OK, counting here, count me as number three opposing the overcategorisation that you are doing. I saw on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals that also others are opposing this overcategorisation. I am sorry, I am asking you to a) stop immediately, b) revert the new creations and c) discuss before even considering to continue. Please consider this as a final request. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Categorisation 2Edit

You initially changed here a compound from an amide to an aldehyde, which was followed by another change so now it is in yet another too specific category. Really, that compound is a formamide, but calling it an amide is more than specific enough.

Seen that there is no consensus for category changed, I have now proposed community sanctions against this overcategorisation. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals#Again ..Categories. I am sorry, but I feel that this now really has to stop. I hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I have asked you to stop overcategorisation, and I notice that a) you did not even take the effort to respond to that request or any questions asked, and b) you continue with it. The last discussion that was mentioned in my previous remark ended in the conclusion that the overcategorisation should stop, and a proposed change ended in the same conclusion, leave it at the old scheme.

This is your final warning - as goes for others, DISCUSS your intended category chances, and only implement them when you have consensus.. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Note that you will have your edit privileges revoked immediately and without further notice if you continue. DMacks (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

  • this edit is after this warning on your talkpage. This means that you, at the very least, have seen the orange banner, and likely also your talkpage. I don't know if you read this thread, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt (you should have reverted your last edit yourself after reading this thread and start discussing) and assume that that edit resulted in you getting the orange banner (though I expect you saw it when you loaded EA-3167 ...). Let it be clear, the next categorisation/recategorisation is going to result in a block. Regards. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The thread that brought us here, again, is Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Chemicals#Suggested new categories. I really suggest that you read that, and notice that there is significant resistance against the (re-)categorisations that are pushed through. Other editors have been receiving similar warnings (there are threads higher up on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Chemicals regarding that, and in the archives. Whatever, there is no consensus to change, and there may also not be a consensus to keep it like it is (or maybe it is not good enough as it is). But pushing the change through while there is resistance is NOT the way forward. Consider to write out a scheme, and discuss that. If that scheme gets enough support, then, and only then, it can be implemented. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:ValeratesEdit

Hi. Forgive my total ignorance on the subject but is there supposed to be a difference between Category:Valerates and Category:Valearates? Even the term valearate appears to (the ignorant) me as a typo of valerate. If that's the case, we shouldn't keep Category:Valearates around and I don't understand why you would empty and blank the category yet specifically instruct administrators to leave it alone. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 12:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok. I tagged the category for speedy deletion. Should be done soon. Pichpich (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Stop categorizationEdit

Please stop your ongoing chemical categorization, it is not helpful and, in many cases, misleading or wrong. Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemicals#The_scheme. Cacycle (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I hope you remember this warning (and this retracted warning, which was followed be a clarification here). This regards any form of categorisation from now on. --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Your block has expired, so you are free to resume editing. DMacks (talk) 00:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:1,4-diazepansEdit

Category:1,4-diazepans, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Chemistry categoriesEdit

Please stop creating new chemistry categories without first getting consensus from one of the chemistry wikiprojects. You've been blocked in the past for disruptive overcategorization of chemicals contrary to consensus, and I'd rather not see that again. Specifically, do not create categories which apply to very few existing articles (Category:Pyrazinoquinoxalines, Category:Chromenoindenoindols, Category:Ketotrioses, etc.). Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, حسن علي البط. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Furones has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:Furones, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 13:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Chemical categories once againEdit

I have started a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Niche_categories_for_chemicals regarding some of the categories you have recently created. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion. ChemNerd (talk) 13:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nicotinic acidsEdit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Nicotinic acids requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 15:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Picolinic acidsEdit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Picolinic acids requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 15:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2,3-NaphthoquinonesEdit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2,3-Naphthoquinones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, حسن علي البط. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please be more careful regarding categorization.Edit

Please remember that compounds containing certain structure don't necessarily belong in the category for compound with a related structure. For example quinones generally shouldn't be lumped together with hydroquinones or the related aromatic rings, and it's confusing to put saturated or partially saturated versions of compounds in the category for the unsaturated ones. Also if you take something out of a category please give at least a short explanation as to why you did so in the edit summary. Okay? If you disagree with me, please let me know why. I'm open to further discussions. Please respond. --OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 00:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, حسن علي البط. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, حسن علي البط. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Cinnamates has been nominated for renamingEdit

 

Category:Cinnamates, which you created, has been nominated for possible renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 22:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

PQQ biosynthesis from 3-dehydroshikimate?!?Edit

First--thank you for your tireless work in improving wikipedia. I have to ask: Where did you find the information on biosynthesis of pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) from 3-dehydroshikimate? Is it a paper that's not available in English? If so, I'm DYING for a translation; the only known biosynthesis in the english-speaking world is via a polypeptide precursor that gets folded, fused, and trimmed away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhichDoctor (talkcontribs) 15:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Tellurium heterocycles has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:Tellurium heterocycles has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 09:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)