*The Crest of the Peacock*

** The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics ** is a book authored by George Gheverghese Joseph and published by Princeton University Press, the third edition of which was released in 2011.

^{[1]}The book was brought out as a response to view of the history of mathematics epitomized by Morris Kline's statement that, comparing to what the Greeks achieved, "the mathematics of Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write, as opposed to great literature",

^{[2]}criticised by Joseph as "Eurocentric".

^{[3]}

Author | George Gheverghese Joseph |
---|---|

Language | English |

Subject | History of mathematics |

Publisher | Princeton University Press |

Publication date | 1991 |

Pages | 592 |

ISBN | 9780691135267 |

The book is divided into 11 chapters. Chapter 1 provides a lengthy justification for the book. Chapter 2 is devoted to a discussion of the mathematics of Native Americans and Chapter 3 to the mathematics of ancient Egyptians. In the next two chapters the mathematics of Mesopotamia is considered. There are two chapters dealing with Chinese mathematics, three chapters with Indian mathematics. The book concludes with a chapter on the Islamic contribution to mathematics.

## PlagiarismEdit

C. K. Raju accused Joseph and Dennis Almerida of plagiarism ^{[4]} of his decade long scholastic work ^{[5]} that began in 1998 for the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture funded by the Indian Academy of Sciences concerning Indian mathematics and its possible knowledge transfer. An ethics investigation of the research team of George Gheverghese Joseph and Dennis Almeida led to the dismissal of Dennis Almeida by University of Exeter ^{[6]} and the University of Manchester posting an erratum and acknowledgement of C.K. Raju's work. ^{[7]}

G. G. Joseph denies the charges. ^{[8]} ^{[9]}

## ReviewsEdit

- A review of the first edition of the book: Victor J Katz (August 1992). "Book Review: The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics: By George Gheverghese Joseph" (PDF).
*Historia Mathematica*.**19**(3): 310–315. doi:10.1016/0315-0860(92)90042-a. Retrieved 5 March 2016. - A review of the book by European Mathematical Information Service: Abdul Karim Bangura (Summer 2001). "Review of The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. 2nd. ed".
*Nexus Mathematical Journal*.**3**(3). Retrieved 5 March 2016. - A review of the book by David Pingree: David Pingree (September 1993). "Reviewed Work: The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics by George Gheverghese Joseph".
*Isis*.**84**(3): 548–549. doi:10.1086/356553. JSTOR 235648. - For a critical assessment of some of the claims and arguments of the author: Clemency Montelle (December 2013). "Review of The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics" (PDF).
*Notices of the AMS*: 1459–1463. Retrieved 5 March 2016.

## ReferencesEdit

**^**"The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics Third Edition".*Princeton University Press*. Princeton University. Retrieved 5 March 2016.**^**Joseph (1991), p. 177 misquotes Kline by replacing "Babylonians" by "Mesopotamians". The actual quote from Kline is "Compared with the accomplishments of their immediate successors, the Greeks, the mathematics of the Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write as opposed to great literature." Morris Kline (1962).*Mathematics: A Cultural Approach*. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. p. 14., Mathematics for Liberal Arts (1967), re-published as Mathematics for the Nonmathematician (1985), p. 14.**^**Clemency Montelle (December 2013). "Book Review" (PDF).*Notices of the AMS*: 1459–1463. Retrieved 5 March 2016.**^**http://ckraju.net/Joseph/Summary-table-of-plagiarism-by-Joseph-and-Almeida.pdf**^**C.K. Raju. (2007). Cultural Foundations of Mathematics. Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-81-317-0871-2**^**"Prof Raju's Charge of Plagiarism Found Correct" Times of India/ Hindustan Times (Nov 7, 2004) http://ckraju.net/press/HT8Nov2004p1.pdf**^**https://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/indians-predated-newton-discovery-by-250-years/**^**"Indian claims Brit study on calculus was plagiarised" Times of India/ Hindustan Times (Aug 20, 2007)**^**Hindustan Times Correction: http://ckraju.net/press/HT25Aug07.jpg (Aug 25, 2007)

This article about a mathematical publication is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |

This article about cultural anthropology is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |