Talk:Top Cat

Active discussions

Archive 2003-2009

No summary of the main characterEdit

In the Characters section, there is no information given on the main character, Top Cat. Somebody might want to add a character summary for T.C. Safiel (talk) 03:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

It makes no sense for there not to be a character description of the main character, Top Cat. --Hoppybunny (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

'Film' section unsourcedEdit

While I'd be delighted if there are solid plans to 'reboot' Top Cat as a feature film, Wikipedia is not a blog and therefore requires reliable sources (see WP:RS) for this information. If none are forthcoming I'll see what I can come up with, and if I can't the section will have to go per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. Jusdafax 15:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

New Film in this 2011Edit

A new film version of Top Cat is in post-production of a Mexico-Argentina co-production slated for release in September 2011. ZirKarloz — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Analysis section removed - NPOV violationEdit

A few weeks ago I happened upon an 'Analysis' section in the Yogi Bear article which struck me as being out of place given that it contained an application of Critical Theory to a subject not related to this field. Since Critical Theory is a decidedly non-neutral paradigm this was very much out of place in the article on a cartoon bear. I also noticed the section had been removed and re-instated several times with justifications which themselves violated NPOV by claiming that the material was relevant to the subject. I therefore added a note to the talk page for the article and removed the section with the admonition to justify a re-instatement in some way. The section was re-instated without justification so I removed it a second time, again asking for a justification why this clear NPOV violation should be upheld. Given the strange combination of subject matter - critical theory applied to cartoon figures - I decided to check whether this NPOV violation occurred in other articles, which it turned out it does. Since Wikipedia is not a political action platform these sections have no place here. I will therefore remove the 'Analysis' section with the stated justification. If another editor wants to revert this removal he or she should justify this in some way by explaining why an expression of political activism has a place in a Wikipedia entry on a cartoon figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetanwiki (talkcontribs) 23:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

End productionEdit

shouldnt this article have a secton about it's ending and or cancellation? (talk) 05:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Return to "Top Cat" page.