Talk:Sex and the City

Active discussions

Dubious material sourced to the Daily Mail removedEdit

I tagged this as needing a citation, but then I looked into the history of the article and found that it was originally sourced to a tabloid before someone removed the citation, and then someone else added an irrelevant citation that had nothing to do with the content.[1][2][3][4][5] The material is unsourced, and for years it was dubiously sourced to the Daily Mail; no one since 2010 has been able to locate a better source. So I have removed it. Hijiri 88 (やや) 02:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Article critique Week 3Edit

The article is relatively neutral, but some of the sources caught my attention. Under the reception section, the author cites quotes and rankings from ABC News, Glamour magazine, etc. as examples of criticism towards the show. It is difficult to see these sources as being "reliable" especially since their main genre is not necessarily literature. For example, the author of the ABC character ranking article is not a true literary critic, so citing her ranking as an example of critical reception seems to be slightly inaccurate. The bias is not noted within the Wikipedia article either. However, the content of the Wikipedia article itself is all related to the main topic and nicely organized. Hcw5 (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC).

The title of the show, movies and book is "Sex AND the City" NOT "Sex IN the City"Edit

Please correct this. It says Sex in the City several times both in the text and in the headings. That is inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

It seems to be a case of Mandela effect:
Sex in the City - Intro
Sex and the City by David Brodsky
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 23:11, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Edited Versions for Syndication TV BroadcastEdit

It would be nice if it was specified that the versions of the show that are broadcast nowadays on cable television are heavily edited for time (a.k.a. censored). Many people who have never watched the show might not know that. They should be advised, since the changes severely affect the quality of the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Criticism only from the left???Edit

Sorry, the show glorifies sexual activities and moral decay. I guess you can find many right-wing, conservative, christian voices who have a massive problem with this show. Why not giving them a voice in the article?? (talk) 23:55, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia includes coverage from independent reliable sources. If there is coverage from such sources that we don't include, one likely reason is that no one has added it. You are someone, IP editor. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Return to "Sex and the City" page.