Active discussions

Pi is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 22, 2012.
Article milestones
July 23, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
October 25, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
November 10, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 30, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 18, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
June 4, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Coprime approximation to piEdit

There is an insane method of estimating pi given by one R. Chartres in Philosophical Magazine from 1840 based on the probability of coprimality. SpinningSpark 08:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Lets change DOI on Salikhov, V. (2008). "On the Irrationality Measure of pi"Edit

to 10.1134/S0001434610090294 because SciHub only gives correct article on THAT DOI. 2A00:1FA0:44DF:31F8:C1A6:49C:82FC:FAA8 (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2020Edit

Please add the missing word (in bold):
The invention of calculus soon led to the calculation of hundreds of digits of π, enough for all practical scientific computations. (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

  Done, thanks! ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Defining π with circumference without integral calculusEdit

In his book, Remmert referred to integral definitions, not to the circumference definition. Not all definitions of π with circumference rely on integral calculus. You can use polygonal paths and then define arc length as a limit of a sum of certain lengths of line segments. This does not make use of derivatives and integrals. You can then prove that this definition is equivalent to the integral-derivative definition of arc length, but you do not have to. The "Definition" subsection should be edited accordingly. A1E6 (talk) 16:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Return to "Pi" page.