Talk:Nuclear weapon

Active discussions
Nuclear weapon is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 13, 2004.
Article milestones
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
May 26, 2005Featured article reviewKept
April 29, 2006Featured topic candidateNot promoted
May 2, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
July 15, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
June 13, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article

Move discussion in progressEdit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hating America: The New World Sport which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Recent qualitative editsEdit

I'm finding the following edits by Wikkileaker to be unencyclopedic and oddly qualitative: [1] and [2]. What do other editors think? Attic Salt (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Agree --Ita140188 (talk) 19:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Agree as well. Looks like unsourced personal opinions, we should remove the text and Wikkileaker should have started the discussion here instead of reverting to re-insert their first change. --McSly (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

I removed the material. Attic Salt (talk) 12:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Missing piecesEdit

Cruise missles and stand-off weapons (like Hounddog for B52) are another delivery method for nuclear weapons. These nuclear tipped cruise missles are destabilizing because like ICBMs and SLBMs are nearly invulnerable to interception.

China includes decoys in its MIRVs further hindering defense.

Russia/US now spending Trillion $ to upgrade nuclear weapons (current issue). Tritium half life is 12 yrs. Polonium (Polonium-Beryllium neutron sources for Uranium 235 bombs) half life is <one year. Plutonium over time becomes contaminated with decay products and less reliable as a nuclear weapon. Result is after a decade, current nuclear weapons require replacement or at least refurbishing. Separating contaminating Plutonium isotopes is difficult.

U235 has a very high cross-section (probability) for absorbing low energy neutrons. Result is U236m (or U236 at a higher energy level) which usually fissions (breaks apart) and gives off 2.4 fast neutrons (to continue reaction) but 18% of reactions (fusion of U235 + neutron) only emits a gamma ray. Hence, with no moderator, nuclear bomb reaction is propagated by high energy (high MeV) neutrons, which split U235 & U238 at near the same lower probability rate. The higher loss of high MeV neutrons and gamma rays results in unreacted fuel hence lower than ideal yields.

Re largest bomb, each fissile material has its own critical mass (& volume) such that enough neutrons are retained to propagate a chain reaction. Minimum size bomb just larger than critical mass formed from one or more subcritical masses. Limit for larger bomb is number of subcritical pieces kept apart. (Imploding a hollow sphere of Pu239 with explosives, also.)

Re “Tamper”: Could use Thorium? Thorium (and Bismuth et al) also fission from impact of high MeV neutrons and gamma rays. Shjacks45 (talk) 22:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

After the use of Nuclear Weapons in World War II, it showed the world why these types of bombs should not be used in war again. If these bombs were used today, there very well may be a nuclear fallout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LyonsJ7 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Only Six Countries?Edit

The section on Fusion Weapons states that only six countries have tested thermonuclear weapons. This does not include North Korea. Shouldn't it? The balance of opinion seems to be that the 2017 test was thermonuclear. NPguy (talk) 04:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Oppenheimer was not the inventor of atomic bombEdit

The inventor was Leó Szilárd|--Liltender (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Return to "Nuclear weapon" page.