|Jainism has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jainism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
|This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.|
|Jainism has been listed as a level-3 vital article in Philosophy. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as GA-Class.|
|This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.|
|A fact from Jainism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 6 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
Recent additions to lead sectionEdit
Capankajsmilyo: I'm a bit concerned about the continuing instability, and especially the repeated additions to the lead section, including new citations. If the citations are at all important, they should be moved to the article body and formatted like the rest. The lead is no place for "new" concepts, as it is purely meant as a summary of the rest of the article. I think this needs urgent attention, or it'll continue to degrade the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- Was one of these the 3rd sentence? Now: "Jainism is transtheistic and forecasts that universe evolves without violating law of substance dualism, auto executed through the middle ground between principles of parallelism and interactionism.". That's just bizarre in a GA, & seems not very strongly sourced. Suggest removal or burial lower down, with some expansion to clarify. Johnbod (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)