Wikipedia:Featured article review/Karnataka/archive1: Difference between revisions

→‎Karnataka: reply to bogus notion
(→‎Karnataka: fixed one issue.)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(→‎Karnataka: reply to bogus notion)
Article does not meet the FA criteria. [[User:RetiredDuke|RetiredDuke]] ([[User talk:RetiredDuke|talk]]) 12:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
: I've boldly removed all of those tables on climate and provided some concise information on climate change to the article. I cannot find the temperature records in scientific sources, and am insufficiently familiar with Indian newspapers to know which ones I can cite. [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 16:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
::I'm linking [ the response] I left to this ludicrous notion at WT:INDIA. Apparently some busybodies have taken it upon themselves to descend like a bunch of locusts on the golden yellow fields of old FAs. That they are know-nothings about what they devour has never bothered locusts. Omniverous eaters they are. No matter that most people are stressed, depressed, sick, on vacation from Wikipedia, our brilliant FAR warriors seem to be on amphetamines.
::I have never been to South India, let alone to Karnataka, I don't know the Kannada language spoken there, but still, out of curiosity, I have written some articles about its history ([[Political history of Mysore and Coorg (1565–1760)]]), its epigraphists ([[A. N. Narasimhia]], [[G. S. Gai]]), its old inscriptions ([[Kappe Arabhatta]], [[Halmidi Inscription]])... I would never in a hundred years have the gumption to post such an ignorant and arrogant notice. Utterly shameful. Utterly, utterly, utterly. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 04:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)