Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences: Difference between revisions

m (v2.03b - Bot T20 CW#61 - WP:WCW project (Reference before punctuation))
== Bibliography Further reading ==
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1= Collison |first1=Robert L. |last2= Preece |first2=Warren E.| title= Encyclopaedia|url= |publisher=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |date=2015|ref=harv}}
*Bocast, Alexander. ''Chambers on Definition''. McLean: Berkeley Bridge Press, 2016. ({{ISBN|978-1-945208-00-3}}).
*Bradshaw, Lael Ely. "Ephraim Chambers’Chambers' Cyclopedia." ''Notable Encyclopedias of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: Nine Predecessors of the Encyclopédie''. Ed. Frank Kafker. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1981. 123–137. ({{ISBN|0-7294-0256-8}}).
*Collison, Robert. ''Encyclopædias: Their History Throughout the Ages''. New York: Hafner, 1966. {{OCLC|368968}}
*Kafker, Frank. A. ''Notable Encyclopedias of the Late Eighteenth Century: Eleven Successors of the Encyclopédie''. Oxford : Voltaire Foundation at the Taylor Institution, 1994.
*Kolb, Gwin J. and James H. Sledd. “Johnson’s"Johnson's ‘Dictionary’'Dictionary' and Lexicographical Tradition." ''Modern Philology'' 50.3 (Feb. 1953): 171–194.
*Mack, Ruth. “The"The Historicity of Johnson’sJohnson's Lexicographer." ''Representations'' 76 (Fall 2001): 61–87.
*Shorr, Phillip. ''Science and Superstition in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of the Treatment of Science in Two Encyclopedias of 1725–1750''. New York: Columbia, 1932. {{OCLC|3633346}}
*Walsh, S. Patraig. "Cyclopaedia." ''Anglo-American General Encyclopedias: A Historical Bibliography, 1703–1967''. New York: R.R. Bowker, 1968. 38–39. {{OCLC|577541}}
*Yeo, Richard. "The Best Book in the Universe": Ephraim Chambers’Chambers' Cyclopedia. In ''Encyclopædic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture.'' Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 120–169. ({{ISBN|0-521-65191-3}})
*Yeo, Richard R. "A Solution to the Multitude of Books: Ephraim Chambers's Cyclopaedia (1728) as "the Best Book in the Universe."" ''Journal of the History of Ideas'', v. 64 (1), 2003. pp. 61–72. ({{ISSN|0022-5037}})