Talk:Emotional reasoning: Difference between revisions

→‎Revert of copy edit: took another pass at it and removed copy edit tag
(→‎Revert of copy edit: took another pass at it and removed copy edit tag)
:What I have done now is to manually restore those of your edits that applied as much to the good version as the problem version - i.e. edits that I could see that you would have made if the problem edits had not been there. If there are other parts of your edits that you wish to restore, I have no objection.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 06:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Toddy1}} Ah, I understand. We've probably had an influx of new editors with time on their hands. The [[WP:GOCE|Guild of Copy Editors]] noticed some "enthusiastic newcomers" who may not have the best gasp of the language or encyclopedic writing. Thanks for going over it again. I took one more pass at the article and made some changes for conciseness and clarity, encyclopedic tone (going a little more formal than "mix up" and "do"), and MOS minutia (not repeating the subject in section headers, list formatting, [[MOS:CURLY]]). I removed the copy edit tag, as I feel it's about as good as can be expected until more citations are added to deal with the verifiability issues. I'm least certain about the ''schema'' material, but I hope it's decent. Feel free to tweak it around a bit more. – [[User:Reidgreg|Reidgreg]] ([[User talk:Reidgreg|talk]]) 13:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)