User talk:Juliette Han: Difference between revisions

::No hard feelings: on the contrary, thanks for starting the review last week. Was just looking for a practical way out w.r.t. the review having gotten in limbo as a result of things that have no relation whatsoever with the GA candidate, nor with its initiated review. I worked hard to get that article in shape: this limbo is not something the article deserves. So I asked the other editors aware of the situation whether they can suggest a way out. If you don't want to be part of that way out, I can understand that. But I want to move on: a GA review should be finished in about a week, and we're well past that, without the initiated review having delivered anything tangible. --[[User:Francis Schonken|Francis Schonken]] ([[User talk:Francis Schonken|talk]]) 14:56, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
:::{{re|Francis Schonken}} I had no prior knowledge of these circumstances as you can imagine, so the only practical way out I see is my request being reviewed soon. I didn't mean that I'm not willing to end the review, it was that my current indefinite block is not something I can harmonise my editing with. I'm sure the situation will be cleared up in the short term. [[User:Juliette Han|Juliette Han]] ([[User talk:Juliette Han#top|talk]]) 15:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 
{{ping|Francis Schonken}} [[WP:GANI]] provides specifically for scenarios where the reviewer is not able to complete the review: {{ex|A reviewer who starts a review has committed to complete it in a timely manner, but in rare occasions a reviewer withdraws due to illness or other reasons. In such cases, the first step would be to contact the reviewer. If this does not resolve the issue, then a new reviewer is needed. In order to find one, edit the <nowiki>{{GA nominee}}</nowiki> template on the article talk page as follows: Increment the <nowiki>|page= parameter (e.g. from "page=1" to "page=2"), and change the |status= parameter from "status=onreview" or "status=onhold" to the blank setting "status="</nowiki>. You can also remove the transclusion of the former GA review from the article talk page if you wish, but this is not essential. Save the page. A bot will reset the nomination in its same position in the queue on the GA nominations page. If the reviewer has not made any comments other than opening the review, it may be better to request a G6 deletion of the review page and start over.}} [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 19:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)