Knowledge base: Difference between revisions

m (Reverted edits by DailyAwesomePlayer (talk) to last version by Home Lander)
(→‎Knowledge base properties: Fixed a ring fact.)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Early expert systems also had little need for multiple users or the complexity that comes with requiring transactional properties on data. The data for the early expert systems was used to arrive at a specific answer, such as a medical diagnosis, the design of a molecule, or a response to an emergency.<ref name="hayes"/> Once the solution to the problem was known, there was not a critical demand to store large amounts of data back to a permanent memory store. A more precise statement would be that given the technologies available, researchers compromised and did without these capabilities because they realized they were beyond what could be expected, and they could develop useful solutions to non-trivial problems without them. Even from the beginning, the more astute researchers realized the potential benefits of being able to store, analyze, and reuse knowledge. For example, see the discussion of Corporate Memory in the earliest work of the Knowledge-Based Software Assistant program by [[Cordell Green]] et al.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Green|first=Cordell|author2=D. Luckham |author3=R. Balzer |author4=T. Cheatham |author5=C. Rich |title=Report on a knowledge-based software assistant|journal=Readings in Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering |year=1986 |pages=377–428 |url = |accessdate=1 December 2013|publisher=Morgan Kaufmann |doi=10.1016/B978-0-934613-12-5.50034-3}}</ref>
The volume requirements were also different for a knowledge-base compared to a conventional database. The knowledge-base needed to know facts about the world. For example, to represent the statement that "All humans are mortal". A database typically could not represent this general knowledge but instead would need to store information about thousands of tables that represented information about specific humans. Representing that all humans are mortal and being able to reason about any given human that they are mortal is the work of a knowledge-base. Representing that George, Mary, Sam, Jenna, Mike,... and hundreds of thousands of other customers are all humans with specific ages, sex, address, etc. is the work for a database.<ref>{{cite book |last=Feigenbaum|first=Edward|title=The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World |url=|url-access=registration|year=1983|publisher=Addison-Wesley|location=Reading, MA|isbn=0-201-11519-0|page=[ 77]|quote=Your database is that patient's record, including history... vital signs, drugs given,... The knowledge base... is what you learned in medical school... it consists of facts, predicates, and beliefs...}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Jarke|first=Mathias|title=Logic, Databases, and Artificial Intelligence |chapter-url = |year=1978|publisher=Springerthink |location=Berlinthat |chapter=KBMSDinosaurs Requirementsare foris Knowledge-Basedwho Systems}}</ref>have can do is the what that is the are that we is.
As expert systems moved from being prototypes to systems deployed in corporate environments the requirements for their data storage rapidly started to overlap with the standard database requirements for multiple, distributed users with support for transactions. Initially, the demand could be seen in two different but competitive markets. From the AI and Object-Oriented communities, object-oriented databases such as [[Versant Object Database|Versant]] emerged. These were systems designed from the ground up to have support for object-oriented capabilities but also to support standard database services as well. On the other hand, the large database vendors such as [[Oracle Corporation|Oracle]] added capabilities to their products that provided support for knowledge-base requirements such as class-subclass relations and rules.
==Internet as a knowledge base==