Fiducial inference: Difference between revisions

m
Alter: issue, isbn. Add: jstor, hdl. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated.
m (Alter: issue, isbn. Add: jstor, hdl. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated.)
==Background==
 
The general approach of fiducial inference was proposed by [[Ronald Fisher]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Fisher | first1 = R. A. | year = 1935 | title = The fiducial argument in statistical inference | url = http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1935.tb02120.x/epdf | journal = Annals of Eugenics | volume = 5 | issue = 4| pages = 391–398 | doi=10.1111/j.1469-1809.1935.tb02120.x| hdl = 2440/15222 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/seidenfeld/relating%20to%20Fisher/Fisher's%20Fiducial%20Argument%20and%20Bayes%20Theorem.pdf R. A. Fisher's Fiducial Argument and Bayes' Theorem by Teddy Seidenfeld]</ref> Here "fiducial" comes from the Latin for faith. Fiducial inference can be interpreted as an attempt to perform [[inverse probability]] without calling on [[prior probability distribution]]s.<ref>Quenouille (1958), Chapter 6</ref> Fiducial inference quickly attracted controversy and was never widely accepted<ref>Neyman, Jerzy. "Note on an article by Sir Ronald Fisher." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) (1956): 288–294.</ref>. Indeed, counter-examples to the claims of Fisher for fiducial inference were soon published.{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}} These counter-examples cast doubt on the coherence of "fiducial inference" as a system of [[statistical inference]] or [[inductive logic]]. Other studies showed that, where the steps of fiducial inference are said to lead to "fiducial probabilities" (or "fiducial distributions"), these probabilities lack the property of additivity, and so cannot constitute a [[probability measure]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}}
 
The concept of fiducial inference can be outlined by comparing its treatment of the problem of [[interval estimation]] in relation to other modes of statistical inference.
==References==
*[[David R. Cox|Cox, D. R.]] (2006). ''Principles of Statistical Inference'', CUP. {{ISBN|0-521-68567-2}}.
*{{cite book |last=Fisher |first=R A |coauthors= |title=Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference|year=1956 |publisher=Hafner |location=New York |isbn=978-0-02-844740-97}}
* [[Ronald A. Fisher|Fisher, Ronald]] "Statistical methods and scientific induction" ''Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B'' 17 (1955), 69—78. (criticism of statistical theories of [[Jerzy Neyman]] and [[Abraham Wald]] from a fiducial perspective)
* {{cite journal|
*Williams, E. J. (1959) ''Regression Analysis'', Wiley {{LCCN|59011815}}
*Young, G. A., Smith, R. L. (2005) ''Essentials of Statistical Inference'', CUP. {{ISBN|0-521-83971-8}}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Fraser | first1 = D. A. S. | year = 1961 | title = The fiducial method and invariance | url = | journal = Biometrika | volume = 48 | issue = 3/4| pages = 261–80 | doi=10.2307/2332749| jstor = 2332749 }}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Fraser | first1 = D. A. S. | year = 1961 | title = On fiducial inference | url = | journal = Annals of Mathematical Statistics | volume = 32 | issue = 3| pages = 661–676 | doi=10.1214/aoms/1177704962}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fiducial Inference}}
1,228,986

edits