U.S. Route 163: Difference between revisions

155 bytes added ,  2 years ago
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta)
m (→‎Junction list: minor adjustment)
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta))
The state of Utah signed a joint intent with the [[Navajo Nation]] and [[San Juan County, Utah|San Juan County]] in 1986 to construct a new highway to connect [[Bluff, Utah|Bluff]] with [[Montezuma Creek, Utah|Montezuma Creek]]. Businesses in Monument Valley asked the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to request extensions of US&nbsp;163 and [[U.S. Route 666 (Utah)|US 666]] using this new road.<ref name=resolutions666>{{cite web|url=http://www.dot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=566642327241913602|title=Highway Resolutions SR-666|publisher=Utah Department of Transportation|accessdate=February 7, 2008}}</ref> The proposal would have US 163 run from [[Cedar City, Utah|Cedar City]] to [[U.S. Route 160 (Colorado)|US 160]] near [[Cortez, Colorado]] along the routes of [[Utah State Route 14|State Route 14]], [[U.S. Route 89]], [[Arizona State Route 98]], [[U.S. Route 160]], the current US&nbsp;163, the new road from Bluff to Montezuma Creek, and [[Colorado State Highway 41]]. The proposal for US&nbsp;666 would extend to [[Richfield, Utah|Richfield]] via upgrades to [[Utah State Route 95|State Route 95]] and [[Utah State Route 24|State Route 24]].<ref name=resolutions666/> UDOT submitted the proposal for US&nbsp;666 to AASHTO, which was rejected. AASHTO cited that the route was not direct, and SR-24 was not built to U.S. Highway standards.<ref name=resolutions666/> UDOT did not pursue the extension of US&nbsp;163, even though the Utah state legislature had already approved the new road from Bluff to Montezuma creek as route 163.<ref name=resolutions163/>
 
With this extension the Utah definition of US&nbsp;163 conflicted with the AASHTO definition. UDOT resolved this discrepancy by signing the extended portion as State Route 163. In 2004, the plan to extend US&nbsp;163 was abandoned, and the extension was renumbered [[Utah State Route 162|SR-162]] to "make the state route numbers run synonymous with the U.S. route designation."<ref name=resolutions163/> Although the state changed the definition of US&nbsp;163 back to match the national definition in 2004, the portion north of Bluff remained unsigned.<ref name=resolutions163/><ref name=mapguy>{{cite web|url=http://www.usends.com/Focus/Crescent/index.html|title=Images of current and historical signs at junction of US&nbsp;163, US&nbsp;191, US&nbsp;6, US&nbsp;50 and I-70 at Crescent Junction|author=Dale Sanderson|accessdate=May 1, 2008|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101122191019/http://www.usends.com/Focus/Crescent/index.html|archivedate=November 22, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In October 2008, UDOT requested and obtained approval to truncate US&nbsp;163 to the junction with US&nbsp;191 resolving the discrepancy.<ref name=aashto/>
 
==Junction list==