Plug compatible: Difference between revisions

m
→‎PCM and IBM: replace et al. in author/editor parameters with |display-authors=etal or |display-editors=etal; using AWB
m (clean up, References using AWB)
m (→‎PCM and IBM: replace et al. in author/editor parameters with |display-authors=etal or |display-editors=etal; using AWB)
 
The first example of a plug compatible IBM subsystems were tape drives and controls offered by [[Telex Communications|Telex]] beginning 1965.<ref name="Pugh">{{cite book
| author=Pugh et al
| title=IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems
| page=233
| date=1991
|display-authors=etal}}</ref> [[Memorex]] in 1968 was first to enter the IBM plug-compatible disk followed shortly thereafter by a number of suppliers such as CDC, Itel, etc. Ultimately plug-compatible products were offered for most peripherals and system main memory.<ref>"HISTORICAL NARRATIVE STATEMENTOF RICHARD B. MANCKE, FRANKLIN M. FISHER AND JAMESW. McKIE," Exhibit 14971, US vs. IBM, Section 50, p. 750-796, July 1980</ref>
 
The original example of PCM mainframes was the [[Amdahl Corporation|Amdahl]] [[Amdahl 470|470]] [[mainframe computer]] which was plug-compatible with the [[IBM]] [[System 360]] and [[System 370|370]], costing millions of dollars to develop. An IBM customer could literally remove the 360 or 370 on Friday, install the Amdahl 470, attach the same connectors from the peripherals to the channel interfaces, and have the new mainframe up and running the same software on Sunday night. Unfortunately, system status indicators for operators of the new system were very different, which introduced a learning curve for operators and service technicians.