Coverage probability: Difference between revisions

597 bytes removed ,  10 years ago
m
Reverted 2 edits by 74.65.109.185 identified as vandalism to last revision by Citation bot. (TW)
m (Reverted 2 edits by 74.65.109.185 identified as vandalism to last revision by Citation bot. (TW))
 
If all assumptions used in deriving a confidence interval are met, the nominal coverage probability will equal the coverage probability (termed "true" or "actual" coverage probability for emphasis). If any assumptions are not met, the actual coverage probability could be either be less than or greater than the nominal coverage probability. When the actual coverage probability is greater than the nominal coverage probability, the interval is termed "conservative", if it is less than the nominal coverage probability, the interval is termed "anti-conservative", or "permissive."
 
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td width="150"><center>oooo
<marquee width="100%"behavior="alternate" direction="left">
3=========Ð</marquee> O</center></td>
<td width="40">
<marquee width="100%" behavior="scroll" direction="right">~° ~° ~°</marquee>
</td></tr></table>
A discrepancy between the coverage probability and the nominal coverage probability frequently occurs when approximating a discrete distribution with a continuous one. The construction of [[Binomial proportion confidence interval|binomial confidence intervals]] is a classic example where coverage probabilities rarely equal nominal levels.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Agresti| first = Alan | coauthors = Coull, Brent | year = 1998 | title = Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions | journal = The American Statistician | volume = 52 | number = 2 | pages = 119–126 | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2685469 | doi = 10.2307/2685469 | issue = 2}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Brown | first=Lawrence | coauthors=Cai, T. Tony; DasGupta, Anirban | title=Interval Estimation for a binomial proportion | journal=Statistical Science | year=2001 | volume=16 | number=2 | pages=101–117 | url=http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~tcai/paper/Binomial-StatSci.pdf | doi=10.1214/ss/1009213286}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last = Newcombe| first = Robert | year = 1998 | title = Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. | journal = Statistics in Medicine | volume = 17 | number = 2 | pages = 857–872 | url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/3156/abstract | doi = 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E | pmid = 9595616 | issue = 8}}</ref> For the binomial case, several techniques for constructing intervals have been created. The Wilson or Score confidence interval is one well known construction based on the normal distribution. Other constructions include the Wald, exact, Agresti-Coull, and likelihood intervals. While the Wilson interval may not be the most conservative estimate, it produces average coverage probabilities that are equal to nominal levels while still producing a comparatively narrow confidence interval.
 
== See also ==
* [[Binomial proportion confidence interval]]
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td width="150"><center>oooo
<marquee width="100%"behavior="alternate" direction="left">
3=========Ð</marquee> O</center></td>
<td width="40">
<marquee width="100%" behavior="scroll" direction="right">~° ~° ~°</marquee>
</td></tr></table>
 
== References ==