Template talk:WikiProject Middle Ages: Difference between revisions

→‎Addendum: qualitycats hook
(→‎Addendum: qualitycats hook)
::2. Please take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WPMILHIST&action=edit], it lists how the different task forces work with the WPMILHIST template. These codes are too complicated for me to figure out how to add them to the WPMA template to make the assessment categories work for the Crusades TF, but I know one thing for sure, "Crusades" is not a TF of the History WP, it's a TF of WPMILHIST, so "history articles" is not the right assessment cat. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 19:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:::So what is? What, exactly, are you trying to achieve? I don't understand what you're aiming for. I can explain what the template is ''currently'' doing: it categorises into subcats of [[:Category:Middle Ages articles by quality]] and subcats of [[:Category:History articles by quality]] for ''all'' pages, and when the Crusades TF is triggered, into subcats of [[:Category:Crusades articles by quality]], which is also picked up by MILHIST. As all Middle Ages articles also fall within the scope of WPHistory, I don't see the issue here. The history cats aren't being added only to the Crusades, they're being added to all pages, which seems appropriate to me. If that is not what is 'supposed' to be going on, you need to more clearly explain what it is you do want. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 20:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Should the qualitycats hook for history articles also have <tt><nowiki>|FULL_QUALITY_SCALE = yes</nowiki></tt> ? -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 20:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)