Template talk:WikiProject Middle Ages: Difference between revisions

== Still has assessment problems ==
{{tlx|edit protected}}
{{tlx|edit protected}}
:1. Could you add: (a)the auto parameter, (b)portal stuff and (c)correct grammar in main article? See: [[Template:WikiProject Middle Ages/sandbox]] for examples.
:2. The assessment category under the qualitycats hook should be military history articles, not history articles. See: [[Portal talk:Crusades]], because when you put Crusades=yes by the WPMA template, it doesn't associate it with any TF, but when you put the parameter by the WPMILHIST template, you get a different categorization scheme altogether. It needs to be fixed to match what the WPMILHIST template does, thanks. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 17:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:{{done}} the first part. Not clear enough on the second: what value, exactly, do you want put in {{para|ASSESSMENT_CAT}} in the /qualitycats hook? "military history articles" doesn't work; [[:Category:NA-Class military history articles]] etc doesn't exist. Please have a test and see what you need to do. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 18:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
::1. Please add portal image <nowiki>|PORTAL_IMG = Grandes chroniques Roland.jpg</nowiki>
::2. Please take a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WPMILHIST&action=edit], it lists how the different task forces work with the WPMILHIST template. These codes are too complicated for me to figure out how to add them to the WPMA template to make the assessment categories work for the Crusades TF, but I know one thing for sure, "Crusades" is not a TF of the History WP, it's a TF of WPMILHIST, so "history articles" is not the right assessment cat. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 19:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)