Template talk:WikiProject Middle Ages: Difference between revisions

== Still has assessment problems ==
 
{{tlx|edit protected}}
:1. Could you add: (a)the auto parameter, (b)portal stuff and (c)correct grammar in main article? See: [[Template:WikiProject Middle Ages/sandbox]] for examples.
:2. The assessment category under the qualitycats hook should be military history articles, not history articles. See: [[Portal talk:Crusades]], because when you put Crusades=yes by the WPMA template, it doesn't associate it with any TF, but when you put the parameter by the WPMILHIST template, you get a different categorization scheme altogether. It needs to be fixed to match what the WPMILHIST template does, thanks. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 17:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:{{done}} the first part. Not clear enough on the second: what value, exactly, do you want put in {{para|ASSESSMENT_CAT}} in the /qualitycats hook? "military history articles" doesn't work; [[:Category:NA-Class military history articles]] etc doesn't exist. Please have a test and see what you need to do. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 18:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)