Template talk:WikiProject Middle Ages: Difference between revisions

m (WP tags)
:Okay, I'll build a sandbox to see if we can figure out the problem. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 15:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
{{done}} I was to blame for the unwanted category, I didn't update all the {{para|BANNER_NAME}} parameters when I moved the template on Thursday. Apologies for that. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 16:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
== Still has assessment problems ==
{{edit protected}}
:1. Could you add: (a)the auto parameter, (b)portal stuff and (c)correct grammar in main article? See: [[Template:WikiProject Middle Ages/sandbox]] for examples.
:2. The assessment category under the qualitycats hook should be military history articles, not history articles. See: [[Portal talk:Crusades]], because when you put Crusades=yes by the WPMA template, it doesn't associate it with any TF, but when you put the parameter by the WPMILHIST template, you get a different categorization scheme altogether. It needs to be fixed to match what the WPMILHIST template does, thanks. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 17:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)