Page history

Aircorn

→‎The six good article criteria: No need for this now considering Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)# Deprecate parenthetical citations. Maybe a note saying the change is justified and maybe some discussion is needed on whether Good articles currently using these need to change. Either way the current advice is wrong.

WhatamIdoing

Removing this, but now from the correct account

Whatamidoing (WMF)

Undid revision 977603818 by Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

Whatamidoing (WMF)

Rv undiscussed addition that is either redundant with the rest of this footnote or that contradicts the previous footnote

RL0919

Reverted edits by PHYDOZX (talk) to last version by Andrybak

PHYDOZX

→‎=phydozx: OBODO nwamama

Andrybak

added Category:Wikipedia article assessment using HotCat

Harrias

add quick-fail criterion per Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations/Archive 24#Waiting period for renominating after a failed nomination?

Jonesey95

noinclude short description

Ched

Importing Wikidata short description: "Description for Good article" (Shortdesc helper)

Burscrave

no edit summary

MusikBot II

Protected "Wikipedia:Good article criteria": High-risk template or module (more info) ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite))

ImmortalWizard

Reverted 1 edit by Timotei YT (talk) to last revision by Mindmatrix (TW)

Timotei YT

no edit summary

Mindmatrix

Reverted edits by 188.39.83.82 (talk) to last version by Bungle

188.39.83.82

no edit summary

188.39.83.82

–—

Bungle

Undid revision 881921315 by 206.227.8.142 (talk)

206.227.8.142

no edit summary

Serols

Reverted edits by 51.9.114.7 (talk) (HG) (3.4.6)

51.9.114.7

no edit summary

PlyrStar93

Reverted edits by 2600:8800:408:9100:2587:5574:5697:3AAA (talk) to last version by Czar

2600:8800:408:9100:2587:5574:5697:3aaa

←Replaced content with 'you just put anything that people might believe.'

Czar

Reverted 2 edits by Panglimaherbal (talk) to last revision by RL0919.

Panglimaherbal

→‎Criteria

Panglimaherbal

no edit summary

RL0919

Reverted edits by 24.5.126.39 (talk) to last version by RL0919

24.5.126.39

→‎Criteria

RL0919

Reverted edits by 72.217.119.17 (talk) to last version by Prhartcom

72.217.119.17

←Blanked the page

72.217.119.17

←Replaced content with 'header '''FART''''''FART ''''

Prhartcom

Add short names.

Prhartcom

Move this to existing footnote (it tends to ramble on; someone may want to c/e it).

Prhartcom

Fix.

Prhartcom

Proper formatting.

Prhartcom

Move Quick fail into the GAC page. Deserved; these words have remained stable for years

Prhartcom

True; encouragement is good. Sentence coped from WP:GANI.

Serial Number 54129

shortcut

Shellwood

Reverted edits by 192.203.137.205 (talk) (HG) (3.4.4)

192.203.137.205

→‎The six good article criteria

SA 13 Bro

Reverted edits by 24.89.136.195 (talk) to last version by TheDragonFire

24.89.136.195

ᾪ @KingJAmes

TheDragonFire

Adjust footnotes to reflect tweaked criterion 6

WhatamIdoing

→‎See also: That's not a guideline

J Milburn

→‎Immediate failures: Clarify that this is talking about full reviews

Iazyges

Changing footnote 7 per talk page consensus.

Iazyges

Removing per consensus.

Redrose64

→‎The six good article criteria: fix misnested list markup - accessibility

Kees08

→‎What cannot be a good article?: portals inactive too. changed the wording to fit since its not respectively anymore. reword if desired.

Kees08

→‎What cannot be a good article?: featured sounds are inactive