20 July 2020
Undid revision 968549419 by Nsae Comp (talk) The WP:Hidden note about the image is right there. You must have seen it.
Replacing image with collage; more clearly differentiating between gender and sex
16 April 2020
15 April 2020
14 April 2020
10 April 2020
Moving Category:Males to Category:Male per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 22#Category:Malesm
8 April 2020
Reverted to revision 944027002 by InternetArchiveBot (talk): Reverting gradually escalating POV with no apparent heed for sources (TW)
7 April 2020
27 March 2020
5 March 2020
28 February 2020
25 February 2020
Reverted to revision 939943276 by Marcocapelle (talk): Nope, it belongs and is in the subcats of those. (TW)
24 February 2020
Undid revision 939918798 by Marcocapelle (talk)
Undid revision 939943276 by Marcocapelle (talk)
9 February 2020
6 February 2020
30 January 2020
29 January 2020
Undid revision 938185352 by Arulmj (talk) As per the hidden text that has been placed near the lede image, this image was selected following extensive discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Man/sandbox, along with additional discussion on this article's talk page. Please do not remove or replace without talk page consensus. Thank you.
old images not genuinm
4 January 2020
2 January 2020
25 December 2019
Readded with source
Comment: edit summary two edits ago should have said "no objection to bringing *some of* this back if..."m
→Sexuality and gender: Source only talks about "mostly straight". Changed ref details to go to Google Books. Whole book is about the identity/orientation group.
→Sexuality and gender: Source doesn't talk about any of this. No objection to bringing it back if a source is found, but content needs to be verifiable.
→Masculinity: Updated according to current lead of eponymous article
→Sexuality and gender: Tweaked wording for clarity. Evolutionary psychology is an academic field, not an influence. Source says "are", not merely "identify as".
22 December 2019
Null edit - of course, my previous edit summary said "unsourced POV" until autocorrect kicked in. Sorry about that.m
Undid revision 931908147 by SunCrow (talk)outsourced POV - not what RS on this topic actually say
→Sexuality and gender: rephrase
→Sexuality and gender: restore English language sentence structure
→Sexuality and gender: move material to next paragraph
→Sexuality and gender: combine paragraphs; remove repetition
→Sexuality: rename section to accurately reflect contents
21 December 2019
→Sexuality: Reworded, I can see how the prose were very clunky. But trans/intersex/non-binary men exist and this is patently obvious. With such an obvious fact the better option is to reword and improve rather than remove - removal seems a bit POV to me, trans/intersex/non-binary people are definitely real
Undid revision 931783736 by SunCrow (talk)Removal of sourced content
Undid revision 931779427 by Bacondrum (talk) it doesn't make sense.
Undid revision 931770559 by SunCrow (talk) No reason for removal given other than "gobbledygook"
no consensus on talk
→Sexuality: remove confusing gobbledygook
→Sexuality: reword clunky sentences
no edit summary