# Position operator

In quantum mechanics, the **position operator** is the operator that corresponds to the position observable of a particle.

The eigenvalues of the position operator - when it is considered with its widest possible domains (Schwartz distribution spaces) - are the possible position vectors of the particle. ^{[1]}

In one dimension, if by the symbol

we denote the unitary eigenvector of the position operator corresponding to the eigenvalue , then, represents the state of the particle in which we know with certainty to find the particle itself at position .

Therefore, denoted the position operator by the symbol - in literature we find also other meaningful symbols for the position operator, for instance (from Lagrangian mechanics), and so on - we can write

- ,

for every real position .

One possible realization of the unitary state with position is the Dirac delta (function) distribution centered at the position , often denoted by .

In quantum mechanics, the ordered (continuous) family of all Dirac distributions, i.e. the family

- ,

is called the (unitary) position basis (in one dimension), just because it is a (unitary) eigenbasis of the position operator .

It is fundamental to observe that there exists only one linear continuous endomorphism on the space of tempered distributions such that

- ,

for every real point . It's possible to prove that the unique above endomorphism is necessarily defined by

- ,

for every tempered distribution , where denotes the coordinate function of the position line - defined from the real line into the complex plane by

## Contents

## IntroductionEdit

In one dimension - for a particle confined into a straight line - the square modulus

- ,

of a normalized square integrable wave-function

- ,

represents the probability density of finding the particle at some position of the real-line, at a certain time.

In other terms, if - at a certain instant of time - the particle is in the state represented by a square integrable wave function and assuming the wave function be of -norm equal 1,

then the probability to find the particle in the position range is

Hence the expected value of a measurement of the position for the particle is the value

where:

1. the particle is assumed to be in the state ;

2. the function

is supposed integrable, i.e. of class ;

3. we indicate by the coordinate function of the position axis.

Accordingly, the quantum mechanical operator corresponding to the observable position is denoted also by

- ,

and defined

for every wave function and for every point of the real line.

The circumflex over the function on the left side indicates the presence of an operator, so that this equation may be read:

*the result of the position operator acting on any wave function equals the coordinate function multiplied by the wave-function .*

Or more simply,

*the operator multiplies any wave-function by the coordinate function .*

**Note 1.** To be more explicit, we have introduced the coordinate function

which simply imbeds the position-line into the complex plane, it is nothing more than the *canonical embedding* of the real line into the complex plane.

**Note 2.** The expected value of the position operator, upon a wave function (state) can be reinterpreted as a scalar product:

assuming the particle in the state and assuming the function be of class - which immediately implies that the function Is integrable, i.e. of class .

**Note 3.** Strictly speaking, the observable position can be point-wisely defined as

for every wave function and for every point of the real line, upon the wave-functions which are precisely point-wise defined functions. In the case of equivalence classes the definition reads directly as follows

for every wave-function .

## Basic propertiesEdit

In the above definition, as the careful reader can immediately remark, does not exist any clear specification of domain and co-domain for the position operator (in the case of a particle confined upon a line). In literature, more or less explicitly, we find essentially three main directions for this fundamental issue.

1. The position operator is defined on the subspace of formed by those equivalence classes whose product by the imbedding lives in the space as well. In this case the position operator

reveals not continuous (unbounded with respect to the topology induced by the canonical scalar product of ), with no eigenvectors, no eigenvalues, consequently with empty eigenspectrum (collection of its eigenvalues).

2. The position operator is defined on the space of complex valued Schwartz functions (smooth complex functions defined upon the real-line and rapidly decreasing at infinity with all their derivatives ). The product of a Schwartz function by the imbedding lives always in the space , which is a subset of . In this case the position operator

reveals __continuous__ (with respect to the canonical topology of ), injective, with no eigenvectors, no eigenvalues, consequently with void eigenspectrum (collection of its eigenvalues). It is (fully) self-adjoint with respect to the scalar product of in the sense that

for every and belonging to its domain .

3. This is, in practice, the most widely adopted choice in Quantum Mechanics literature, although never explicitly underlined. The position operator is defined on the space of complex valued tempered distributions (topological dual of the Schwartz function space ). The product of a temperate distribution by the imbedding lives always in the space , which contains . In this case the position operator

reveals **continuous** (with respect to the canonical topology of ), surjective, endowed with complete families of eigenvectors, real eigenvalues, and with eigenspectrum (collection of its eigenvalues) equal to the real line. It is self-adjoint with respect to the scalar product of in the sense that its transpose operator

which is the position operator on the Schwartz function space, is self-adjoint :

for every (test) function and belonging to the space .

## EigenstatesEdit

The eigenfunctions of the position operator (on the space of tempered distributions), represented in position space, are Dirac delta functions.

* Informal proof.* To show that possible eigenvectors of the position operator should necessarily be Dirac delta distributions, suppose that is an eigenstate of the position operator with eigenvalue . We write the eigenvalue equation in position coordinates,

recalling that simply multiplies the wave-functions by the function , in the position representation. Since the function is variable while is a constant, must be zero everywhere except at the point . Clearly, no continuous function satisfies such properties, moreover we cannot simply define the wave-function to be a complex number at that point because its -norm would be 0 and not 1. This suggest the need of a "functional object" *concentrated* at the point and with integral different from 0: any multiple of the Dirac delta centered at

The normalized solution to the equation

is

- ,

or better

- .

**Proof.** Here we prove rigorously that

- .

Indeed, recalling that the product of any function by the Dirac distribution centered at a point is the value of the function at that point times the Dirac distribution itself, we obtain immediately

**Meaning of the Dirac delta wave.** Although such Dirac states are physically unrealizable and, strictly speaking, they are not functions, Dirac distribution centered at can be thought of as an "ideal state" whose position is known exactly (any measurement of the position always returns the eigenvalue ). Hence, by the uncertainty principle, nothing is known about the momentum of such a state.

## Three dimensionsEdit

The generalisation to three dimensions is straightforward.

The space-time wavefunction is now and the expectation value of the position operator at the state is

where the integral is taken over all space. The position operator is

## Momentum spaceEdit

Usually, in Quantum Mechanics, by representation in the momentum space we intend the representation of states and observables with respect to the canonical unitary momentum basis

- .

In momentum space, the position operator in one dimension is represented by the following differential operator

- ,

where :

- the representation of the position operator in the momentum basis is naturally defined by

- ,

for every wave function (tempered distribution) ;

- represents the coordinate function on the momentum line and the wave-vector function is defined by

- .

## Formalism in Edit

Consider, for example, the case of a spinless particle moving in one spatial dimension (i.e. in a line). The state space for such a particle contains the *L*^{2}-space (Hilbert space) of complex-valued and square-integrable (with respect to the Lebesgue measure) functions on the real line.

The position operator in ,

is pointwise defined by:^{[2]}^{[3]}

for each pointwisely defined square integrable class and for each real number x, with domain

where is the coordinate function sending each point to itself.

Since all continuous functions with compact support lie in *D(Q)*, *Q* is densely defined. *Q*, being simply multiplication by *x*, is a self adjoint operator, thus satisfying the requirement of a quantum mechanical observable.

Immediately from the definition we can deduce that the spectrum consists of the entire real line and that *Q* has purely continuous spectrum, therefore no discrete eigenvalues.

The three-dimensional case is defined analogously. We shall keep the one-dimensional assumption in the following discussion.

## Measurement theory in Edit

As with any quantum mechanical observable, in order to discuss position measurement, we need to calculate the spectral resolution of the position operator

which is

where is the so-called spectral measure of the position operator.

Since the operator of is just the multiplication operator by the embedding function , its spectral resolution is simple.

For a Borel subset of the real line, let denote the indicator function of . We see that the projection-valued measure

is given by

i.e., the orthogonal projection is the multiplication operator by the indicator function of .

Therefore, if the system is prepared in a state , then the probability of the measured position of the particle belonging to a Borel set is

where is the Lebesgue measure on the real line.

After any measurement aiming to detect the particle within the subset B, the wave function collapses to either

or

- ,

where is the Hilbert space norm on .

## See alsoEdit

## ReferencesEdit

**^**Atkins, P.W. (1974).*Quanta: A handbook of concepts*. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-855493-1.**^**McMahon, D. (2006).*Quantum Mechanics Demystified*(2nd ed.). Mc Graw Hill. ISBN 0 07 145546 9.**^**Peleg, Y.; Pnini, R.; Zaarur, E.; Hecht, E. (2010).*Quantum Mechanics*(2nd ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0071623582.