Multidrug tolerance

  (Redirected from Persister cell)

Multidrug tolerance or antibiotic tolerance is the ability of a disease-causing microorganism to resist being killed by antibiotics or other antimicrobials. It is mechanistically distinct from multidrug resistance:[1] It is not caused by mutant microbes, but rather by microbial cells that exist in a transient, dormant, non-dividing state.[2] Microorganisms that display multidrug tolerance can be bacteria, fungi or parasites.


Recognition of antibiotic tolerance dates back to 1944 when Joseph Bigger, an Irish physician working in England, was experimenting with the recently discovered penicillin. Bigger used penicillin to lyse a suspension of bacteria and then inoculated culture medium with the penicillin-treated liquid. Colonies of bacteria were able to grow after antibiotic killing. The important observation that Bigger made was that this new population could again be killed by penicillin except for a small residual population. Hence the residual organisms were not antibiotic resistant mutants but rather a subpopulation of what he called ‘persisters’.[3] The formation of persisters is now known to be a common phenomenon that can occur by the formation of persister cells prior to the antibiotic treatment[4] or in response to a variety of antibiotics.[5]

Relevance to chronic infectionsEdit

Multidrug tolerance is caused by a small subpopulation of microbial cells termed persisters.[6] Persisters are not mutants, but rather are dormant cells that can survive the antimicrobial treatments that kill the majority of their genetically identical siblings. Persister cells have entered a non- or extremely slow-growing physiological state which makes them insensitive (refractory or tolerant) to the action of antimicrobial drugs. When such persisting microbial cells cannot be eliminated by the immune system, they become a reservoir from which recurrence of infection will develop.[7] Such non-growing bacteria have been observed to persist within mammalian cells.[8] Indeed, it appears that persister cells are the main cause for relapsing and chronic infections.[1] Chronic infections can affect people of any age, health, or immune status.

Medical importanceEdit

Bacterial multidrug or antibiotic tolerance poses medically important challenges. It is largely responsible for the inability to eradicate bacterial infections with antibiotic treatment. Persister cells are highly enriched in biofilms, and it has been suggested that this is the reason that makes biofilm-related diseases so hard to treat. Examples are chronic infections of implanted medical devices such as catheters and artificial joints, urinary tract infections, middle ear infections and fatal lung disease .

Distinction from multidrug resistanceEdit

Unlike resistance, multidrug tolerance is a transient, non-heritable phenotype.[1][6][7] Multidrug tolerant persister cells are not antibiotic resistant mutants. Resistance is caused by newly acquired genetic traits (by mutation or horizontal gene transfer) that are heritable and confer the ability to grow at elevated concentrations of antimicrobial drugs. In contrast, tolerant bacteria have the same MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) as susceptible bacteria[2] and differ in the duration of the treatment that they can survive. Multidrug tolerance can be caused by a reversible physiological state in a small subpopulation of genetically identical cells,[1][6][7] similar to a differentiated cell type.[9] It enables this small subpopulation of microbes to survive the antibiotic killing of their surrounding siblings. Persisting cells resume growth when the antimicrobial agent is removed, and their progeny is sensitive to antimicrobial agents.[1][6][7]

Molecular mechanismsEdit

The molecular mechanisms that underlie persister cell formation and multidrug tolerance are largely unknown.[1][7] Persister cells are thought to arise spontaneously in a growing microbial population by a stochastic genetic switch,[7][10] although inducible mechanisms of persister cell formation have been described.[7][11] For instance, Toxin-Antitoxin (TA) systems[12] and a number of different stresses such as SOS-stress[13] and envelope stress[14] have been associated with persister formation. Owing to their transient nature and relatively low abundance, it is hard to isolate persister cells in sufficient numbers for experimental characterization, and only a few relevant genes have been identified to date.[1][7] The best-understood persistence factor is the E. coli high persistence gene, commonly abbreviated as hipA.[15]

Although tolerance is widely considered a passive state, there is evidence indicating it can be an energy-dependent process.[16] Persister cells in E. coli can transport intracellular accumulations antibiotic using an energy requiring efflux pump called TolC.[17]

A persister subpopulation has also been demonstrated in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast persisters are triggered in a small subset of unperturbed exponentially growing cells by spontaneously occurring DNA damage, which leads to the activation of a general stress response and protection against a range of harsh drug and stress environments. As a result of the DNA damage, yeast persisters are also enriched for random genetic mutations that occurred prior to the stress, and are unrelated to the stress survival [18]

Potential treatmentEdit

In May 2011, it was reported by that the addition of certain metabolites can help suppress multidrug tolerance in numerous species of bacteria, including E. coli and S. aureus, by "the generation of a proton-motive force which facilitates aminoglycoside uptake".[19] Phage therapy, where applicable, entirely circumvents antibiotic tolerance.

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b c d e f g Lewis K (2007). "Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 5 (1): 48–56. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557. PMID 17143318.
  2. ^ a b Brauner, A (2017). "Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 14 (5): 320–30. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34. PMID 27080241.
  3. ^ Bigger JW (14 October 1944). "Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilization". Lancet. 244 (6320): 497–500. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)74210-3
  4. ^ Balaban, NQ (2004). "Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch". Science. 305 (5690): 1622–5. doi:10.1126/science.1099390. PMID 15308767.
  5. ^ Lewis, K. Annu Rv Microbiol. 2010;64:357-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306. Persister cells.
  6. ^ a b c d Bigger JW (14 October 1944). "Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicllin by intermittent sterilization". Lancet. 244 (6320): 497–500. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)74210-3.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h Gefen O, Balaban NQ (July 2009). "The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial populations under antibiotic stress" (PDF). FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33 (4): 704–17. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00156.x. PMID 19207742. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-22.
  8. ^ Helaine, Sophie (2014). "Internalization of Salmonella by macrophages induces formation of nonreplicating persisters". Science. 343 (6167): 204–8. doi:10.1126/science.1244705. PMC 6485627. PMID 24408438.
  9. ^ Lopez D, Vlamakis H, Kolter R (January 2009). "Generation of multiple cell types in Bacillus subtilis". FEMS Microbiol Rev. 33 (1): 152–63. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00148.x. PMID 19054118. Archived from the original on 2012-12-09.
  10. ^ Jayaraman R (2008). "Bacterial persistence: some new insights into an old phenomenon" (PDF). J Biosci. 33 (5): 795–805. doi:10.1007/s12038-008-0099-3. PMID 19179767.
  11. ^ Dörr T, Lewis K, Vulic M (2009). Rosenberg SM (ed.). "SOS Response Induces Persistence to Fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli". PLOS Genet. 5 (12): e1000760. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000760. PMC 2780357. PMID 20011100.
  12. ^ Wang, Xiaoxue; Wood, Thomas K. (2011-08-15). "Toxin-Antitoxin Systems Influence Biofilm and Persister Cell Formation and the General Stress Response". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 77 (16): 5577–5583. doi:10.1128/AEM.05068-11. ISSN 0099-2240. PMC 3165247. PMID 21685157.
  13. ^ Dörr, Tobias; Lewis, Kim; Vulić, Marin (2009-12-11). "SOS Response Induces Persistence to Fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli". PLOS Genetics. 5 (12): e1000760. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000760. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 2780357. PMID 20011100.
  14. ^ Kan, Tanaka; Hideo, Takahashi (December 1994). "Cloning, analysis and expression of an rpoS homologue gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1". Gene. 150 (1): 81–85. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(94)90862-1. ISSN 0378-1119. PMID 7959068.
  15. ^ Moyed HS, Bertrand KP (1983). "hipA, a newly recognized gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis". J. Bacteriol. 155 (2): 768–75. doi:10.1128/JB.155.2.768-775.1983. PMC 217749. PMID 6348026.
  16. ^ |journal=Science |volume=354|issue=6318|year=2016|
  17. ^ Pu, Y, et al. (2016) Enhanced Efflux Activity Facilitates Drug Tolerance in Dormant Bacterial Cells. Mol Cell, 62: 284–294.
  18. ^ Yaakov, G., Lerner, D., Bentele, K., Steinberger, J., & Barkai, N. (2017). ″Coupling phenotypic persistence to DNA damage increases genetic diversity in severe stress″. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1,16,
  19. ^ Allison KR, Brynildsen MP, Collins JJ (2011). "Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides". Nature. 473 (7346): 216–220. doi:10.1038/nature10069. PMC 3145328. PMID 21562562.

External linksEdit