This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Human oocyte cryopreservation (egg freezing) is a procedure to preserve a woman's eggs (oocytes). This technique has been used to enable women to postpone pregnancy to a later date – whether for medical reasons such as cancer treatment or for social reasons such as employment or studying. Several studies have proven that most infertility problems are due to germ cell deterioration related to aging. Surprisingly, the uterus remains completely functional in most elderly women. This implies that the factor which needs to be preserved is the woman's eggs. The eggs are extracted, frozen and stored. The intention of the procedure is that the woman may choose to have the eggs thawed, fertilized, and transferred to the uterus as embryos to facilitate a pregnancy in the future. The procedure's success rate (the chances of a live birth using frozen eggs) varies depending on the age of the woman, and ranges from 14.8 percent (if the eggs were extracted when the woman was 40) to 31.5 percent (if the eggs were extracted when the woman was 25).
Oocyte cryopreservation can increase the chance of a future pregnancy for three key groups of women:
- those diagnosed with cancer who have not yet begun chemotherapy or radiotherapy;
- those undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies who do not consider embryo freezing an option; and
- those who would like to preserve their future ability to have children, either because they do not yet have a partner, or for other personal or medical reasons.
Over 50,000 reproductive-age women are diagnosed with cancer each year in the United States. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are toxic for oocytes, leaving few, if any, viable eggs. Egg freezing offers women with cancer the chance to preserve their eggs so that they can attempt to have children in the future.
Oocyte cryopreservation is an option for individuals undergoing IVF who object, either for religious or ethical reasons, to the practice of freezing embryos. Having the option to fertilize only as many eggs as will be utilized in the IVF process, and then freeze any remaining unfertilized eggs can be a solution. In this way, there are no excess embryos created, and there need be no disposition of unused frozen embryos, a practice which can create complex choices for certain individuals.
Additionally, women with a family history of early menopause have an interest in fertility preservation. With egg freezing, they will have a frozen store of eggs, in the likelihood that their eggs are depleted at an early age.
The egg retrieval process for oocyte cryopreservation is the same as that for in vitro fertilization. This includes one to several weeks of hormone injections that stimulate ovaries to ripen multiple eggs. When the eggs are mature, final maturation induction is performed, preferably by using a GnRH agonist rather than human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), since it decreases the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with no evidence of a difference in live birth rate (in contrast to fresh cycles where usage of GnRH agonist has a lower live birth rate).  The eggs are subsequently removed from the body by transvaginal oocyte retrieval. The procedure is usually conducted under sedation. The eggs are immediately frozen.
The egg is the largest cell in the human body and contains a high amount of water. When the egg is frozen, the ice crystals that form can destroy the integrity of the cell. To prevent this, the egg must be dehydrated prior to freezing. This is done using cryoprotectants which replace most of the water within the cell and inhibit the formation of ice crystals.
Eggs (oocytes) are frozen using either a controlled-rate, slow-cooling method or a newer flash-freezing process known as vitrification. Vitrification is much faster but requires higher concentrations of cryoprotectants to be added. The result of vitrification is a solid glass-like cell, free of ice crystals. Indeed, freezing is a phase transition. Vitrification, as opposed to freezing, is a physical transition. Realizing this fundamental difference, vitrification concept has been developed and successfully applied in IVF treatment with the first life birth following vitrification of oocytes achieved in 1999. Vitrification eliminates ice formation inside and outside of oocytes on cooling, during cryostorage and on warming. Vitrification is associated with higher survival rates and better development compared to slow-cooling when applied to oocytes in metaphase II (MII). Vitrification has also become the method of choice for pronuclear oocytes, although prospective randomized controlled trials are still lacking.
During the freezing process, the zona pellucida, or shell of the egg can be modified preventing fertilization. Thus, currently, when eggs are thawed, a special fertilization procedure is performed by an embryologist whereby sperm is injected directly into the egg with a needle rather than allowing sperm to penetrate naturally by placing it around the egg in a dish. This injection technique is called ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection) and is also used in IVF.
The percentage of transferred cycles is lower in frozen cycles compared with fresh cycles (approx. 30% and 50%). Such outcomes are considered comparable.
In a 2013 meta-analysis of more than 2,200 cycles using frozen eggs, scientists found the probability of having a live birth after three cycles was 31.5 percent for women who froze their eggs at age 25, 25.9 percent at age 30, 19.3 percent at age 35, and 14.8 percent at age 40.
Recent modifications in protocol regarding cryoprotectant composition, temperature and storage methods have had a large impact on the technology, and while it is still considered an experimental procedure, it is quickly becoming an option for women. Slow freezing traditionally has been the most commonly used method to cryopreserve oocytes, and is the method that has resulted in the most babies born from frozen oocytes worldwide. Ultra-rapid freezing or vitrification represents a potential alternative freezing method.
In the fall of 2009, The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) issued an opinion on oocyte cryopreservation concluding that the science holds “great promise for applications in oocyte donation and fertility preservation” because recent laboratory modifications have resulted in improved oocyte survival, fertilization, and pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed oocytes in IVF. The ASRM noted that from the limited research performed to date, there does not appear to be an increase in chromosomal abnormalities, birth defects, or developmental deficits in the children born from cryopreserved oocytes. The ASRM recommended that, pending further research, oocyte cryopreservation should be introduced into clinical practice on an investigational basis and under the guidance of an Institutional Review Board (IRB). As with any new technology, safety and efficacy must be evaluated and demonstrated through continued research.
In October 2012, the ASRM lifted the experimental label from the technology for women with a medical need, citing success rates in live births, among other findings. However, they also warned against using it only to delay child-bearing.
In 2014, a Cochrane systematic review about this topic was published. It compared vitrification (the newest technology) versus slow freezing (the oldest one). Key results of that review showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was almost 4 times higher in the oocyte vitrification group than in the slow freezing group, with moderate quality of evidence.
The cost of the egg freezing procedure (without embryo transfer) in the United States, the United Kingdom and other European countries varies in between $5,000 and $12,000. This does not include the fertility medications involved in the procedure which can cost between $4,000 and $5,000. The cost of egg storage can vary from $100 to more than $1,000. It is important for women to be aware that provisional health programs do not cover social egg freezing. Furthermore, no provinces provide funding for IVF after social egg freezing.
Medical tourism may have lower costs than performing egg freezing in high-cost countries like the US. Some well established medical tourism and IVF countries such as Czech Republic, Ukraine and Cyprus offer egg freezing at competitive prices. It is a lower cost alternative to typical US options for egg freezing. Spain and the Czech Republic are popular destinations for this treatment.
Cryopreservation itself has always played a central role in assisted reproductive technology. With the first cryopreservation of sperm in 1953 and of embryos twenty five years later, these techniques have become routine. Dr Christopher Chen of Singapore reported the world's first pregnancy in 1986 using previously frozen oocytes. This report stood alone for several years followed by studies reporting success rates using frozen eggs to be much lower than those of traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques using fresh oocytes. Providing the lead to a new direction in cryobiology, Dr. Lilia Kuleshova was the first scientist to achieve vitrification of human oocytes that resulted in a live birth in 1999. Then recently, two articles published in the journal, Fertility and Sterility, reported pregnancy rates using frozen oocytes that were comparable to those of cryopreserved embryos and even fresh embryos. These newer reports affirm that oocyte cryopreservation technology is advancing.
Almost 42,000 'slow frozen' (as opposed to 'vitrified') human embryo transfers were performed during 2001 in Europe (Andersen et al. 2005)[full citation needed]. In addition, it is estimated that between 300,000 and 500,000 successful human births have resulted worldwide from the transfer of previously ‘slow frozen’ embryos performed from the mid-1970s to 2006.
Elective oocyte cryopreservationEdit
Elective oocyte cryopreservation, also known as social egg freezing, is non-essential egg freezing for the purpose of preserving fertility for delayed child-bearing when natural conception becomes more problematic. The frequency of this procedure has steadily increased since October 2012 when the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) lifted the 'experimental' label from the process. There was a spike in interest in 2014 when global corporations Apple and Facebook revealed they were introducing egg freezing as a benefit for their female employees. This announcement was controversial as some women found it empowering and practical, while others viewed the message these companies were sending to women trying to have a successful long-term career and a family as harmful and alienating. A string of “egg freezing parties” hosted by third-party companies have also helped popularize the concept among young women. Social science research suggests that women use elective egg freezing to disentangle their search for a romantic partner from their plans to have children. 
In 2016, then US Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced that the Department of Defense will cover the cost of freezing sperm or eggs through a pilot program for active duty service members, with the intention of preserving their ability to start a family even if they suffer certain combat injuries.
There are still warnings for women using this technology to fall pregnant at an older age as the risk of pregnancy complications increases with a mother's age. However, studies have shown that the risk of congenital abnormalities in babies born from frozen oocytes is not increased further when compared to naturally conceived babies.
The risks associated with egg freezing relate to the administration of medications to stimulate the ovaries and the procedure of egg collection.
The main risk associated with the administration of medications to stimulate the ovaries is ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS). This is a transient syndrome in which there is increased permeability of the blood vessels, resulting in fluid loss from the vessels into the surrounding tissues. In most cases the syndrome is mild, with symptoms such as abdominal bloating, mild discomfort and nausea. In moderate OHSS there is increased abdominal bloating resulting in pain and vomiting. Reduced urine output may occur. Severe OHSS is serious with even further bloating so that the abdomen appears very distended, thirst and dehydration occur with minimal urine output. There may be shortness of breath and there is an increased risk of DVT and/or pulmonary embolism. Kidney and liver function can be compromised. Hospitalisation under specialist care is indicated. There is no treatment for OHSS, supportive care until the symptoms naturally resolve is required. If an hCG trigger has been used with no embryo transfer, OHSS usually resolves in 7–10 days. If an embryo transfer has occurred and pregnancy results, the symptoms may persist for several weeks. Doctors reduce the likelihood of OHSS occurring by decreasing the doses of gonadotropins (FSH) administered, using a GnRH agonist trigger (instead of an hCG trigger) and freezing all embryos for transfer rather than conducted a fresh embryo transfer.
Risks associated with the egg collection procedure relate to bleeding and infection. The collection procedure involves passing a needle through the wall of the vagina into vascular stimulated ovaries. A small amount of bleeding is inevitable. In rare cases, there is excessive bleeding into the abdomen requiring surgery. It is important that women undergoing the procedure advise their specialist of all medications, including herbal supplements, they are using so the specialist can assess whether any of these medications will affect the ability of the blood to clot. In relation to infection, provided the woman does not have additional risk factors for infection (suppressed immune system, use of immunosuppressive medications or large ovarian endometriomas) the risk of infection is very low.
One additional risk of the ovaries being temporarily increased in size is ovarian torsion. Ovarian torsion occurs when an enlarged ovary twists around on itself, cutting off its blood supply. The condition is excruciatingly painful and requires urgent surgery to prevent the ischaemic loss of the ovary.
- American Cancer Society (2001) Cancer facts and figures 2001. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. Retrieved on April 24, 2007.
- Youssef, Mohamed AFM; Van der Veen, Fulco; Al-Inany, Hesham G; Mochtar, Monique H; Griesinger, Georg; Nagi Mohesen, Mohamed; Aboulfoutouh, Ismail; van Wely, Madelon; Youssef, Mohamed AFM (2014). "Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10): CD008046. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4. PMID 25358904.
- Kuleshova, Lilia; Gianoroli, Luca; Magli, Cristina; Ferraretti, Anna; Trounson, Alan (1999). "Birth following vitrification of small number of human oocytes". Human Reproduction. 14 (12): 3077–3079. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077. PMID 10601099.
- Edgar, D. H.; Gook, D. A. (2012). "A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos". Human Reproduction Update. 18 (5): 536–554. doi:10.1093/humupd/dms016. PMID 22537859.
- McLaughlin, M; Albertini, D F; Wallace, W H B; Anderson, R A; Telfer, E E (2018). "Metaphase II oocytes from human unilaminar follicles grown in a multi-step culture system" (PDF). MHR: Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine. 24 (3): 135–142. doi:10.1093/molehr/gay002. ISSN 1360-9947. PMID 29390119.
Further comments in BBC news article: James Gallagher (2018-02-09). "First human eggs grown in laboratory".
- Magli MC, Lappi M, Ferraretti AP, Capoti A, Ruberti A, Gianaroli L (March 2009). "Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development". Fertil. Steril. 93 (2): 510–516. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.148. PMID 19342025.
- Cil A. P., Bang H., Oktay K. (2013). "Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: An individual patient data meta-analysis". Fertility and Sterility. 100 (2): 492–499.e3. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023. PMC 3888550. PMID 23706339.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A (2009). "With more than 900 babies born, live birth outcomes following oocyte cryopreservation do not appear different from those occurring after conventional IVF". Reprod Biomed Online. 18 (6): 769–776. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60025-9. PMID 19490780.
- CNN April 16, 2007 . Retrieved on April 24, 2007
- ASRM Practice Committee (2009). "ASRM Practice Committee response to Rybak and Lieman: elective self-donation of oocytes". Fertil Steril. 92 (5): 1513–514. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.007. PMID 19836735.
- Glujovsky D, Riestra B, Sueldo C, Fiszbajn G, Repping S, Nodar F, Papier S, Ciapponi A (2014). "Vitrification versus slow freezing for women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 8 (9): D010047. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010047.pub2. PMID 25192224.
- Petropanagos, Angel; Cattapan, Alana; Baylis, Françoise; Leader, Arthur (2015-06-16). "Social egg freezing: risk, benefits and other considerations". CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal. 187 (9): 666–669. doi:10.1503/cmaj.141605. ISSN 0820-3946. PMC 4467930. PMID 25869870.
- Chen C (1986). "Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation". Lancet. 1 (8486): 884–886. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90989-x. PMID 2870356.
- Jain, J.; et al. (2005). "Oocyte cryopreservation". Fertility and Sterility. 86 (4). pp. 1037–1046.
- Grifo, J.; Noyes, N. (2010). "Delivery rate using cyropreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients". Fertility and Sterility. 93 (2): 391–396. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.067. PMID 19439285.
- "ASRM Press Release: Fertility Experts Issue New Report on Egg Freezing; ASRM Lifts "Experimental" Label from Technique". www.asrm.org. Retrieved 2017-02-01.
- Brown, Eliza; Patrick, Mary (2018). "Time, Anticipation, and the Life Course: Egg Freezing as Temporarily Disentangling Romance and Reproduction". American Sociological Review. 83 (5): 959–982. doi:10.1177/0003122418796807.
- "Department of Defense Press Briefing by Secretary Carter on Force of t". U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Retrieved 2017-05-01.
- Noyes, N.; Porcu, E.; Borini, A. (2009-06-01). "Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies". Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 18 (6): 769–776. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60025-9. ISSN 1472-6491. PMID 19490780.
- How egg freezing works, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
- National Cancer Institute – Sexuality and Reproductive Issues
- Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline American Society for Reproductive Medicine (PDF)
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine
- World Association of Reproductive Medicine
- Harrison, K.; et al. (April 2, 2007). "Oocyte cryopreservation as an adjunct to the assisted reproductive technologies". The Medical Journal of Australia. 186 (7): 379. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00946.x. hdl:2440/37259. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Gook, D. A.; Edgar, D. H. (1999). "Cryopreservation of the human female gamete: Current and future issues". Human Reproduction. 14 (12): 2938–40. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.12.2938. PMID 10601074.