Negative capability

Negative capability is a phrase. It was first used by Romantic poet John Keats in 1817 to characterise the capacity of the greatest writers (particularly Shakespeare) to pursue a vision of artistic beauty even when it leads them into intellectual confusion and uncertainty, as opposed to a preference for philosophical certainty over artistic beauty. The term has been used by poets and philosophers to describe the ability of the individual to perceive, think, and operate beyond any presumption of a predetermined capacity of the human being.[citation needed]

Keats: The poet's turn of phraseEdit

Keats used the phrase only briefly in a private letter, and it became known only after his correspondence was collected and published. In a letter to his brothers, George and Thomas, on 22 December 1817, Keats described a conversation he had been engaged in a few days previously:[1]

I had not a dispute but a disquisition with Dilke, upon various subjects; several things dove-tailed in my mind, and at once it struck me what quality went to form a Man of Achievement, especially in Literature, and which Shakespeare possessed so enormously—I mean Negative Capability, that is, when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason—Coleridge, for instance, would let go by a fine isolated verisimilitude caught from the Penetralium of mystery, from being incapable of remaining content with half-knowledge. This pursued through volumes would perhaps take us no further than this, that with a great poet the sense of Beauty overcomes every other consideration, or rather obliterates all consideration.[2]

Samuel Taylor Coleridge was, by 1817, a frequent target of criticism by the younger poets of Keats's generation, often ridiculed for his infatuation with German idealistic philosophy. Against Coleridge's obsession with philosophical truth, Keats sets up the model of Shakespeare, whose poetry articulated various points of view and never advocated a particular vision of truth.

Keats's ideas here, as was usually the case in his letters, were expressed tersely with no effort to fully expound what he meant, but passages from other letters enlarge on the same theme. In a letter to J.H. Reynolds in February 1818, he wrote:

We hate poetry that has a palpable design upon us—and if we do not agree, seems to put its hand in its breeches pocket. Poetry should be great & unobtrusive, a thing which enters into one's soul, and does not startle it or amaze it with itself but with its subject.[3]

In another letter to Reynolds the following May, he contrived the metaphor of 'the chamber of maiden thought' and the notion of the 'burden of mystery', which together express much the same idea as that of negative capability:

I compare human life to a large Mansion of Many Apartments, two of which I can only describe, the doors of the rest being as yet shut upon me—The first we step into we call the infant or thoughtless Chamber, in which we remain as long as we do not think—We remain there a long while, and notwithstanding the doors of the second Chamber remain wide open, showing a bright appearance, we care not to hasten to it; but are at length imperceptibly impelled by the awakening of the thinking principle—within us—we no sooner get into the second Chamber, which I shall call the Chamber of Maiden-Thought, than we become intoxicated with the light and the atmosphere, we see nothing but pleasant wonders, and think of delaying there for ever in delight: However among the effects this breathing is father of is that tremendous one of sharpening one's vision into the heart and nature of Man—of convincing ones nerves that the World is full of Misery and Heartbreak, Pain, Sickness, and oppression—whereby This Chamber of Maiden Thought becomes gradually darken'd and at the same time on all sides of it many doors are set open—but all dark—all leading to dark passages—We see not the balance of good and evil. We are in a Mist—We are now in that state—We feel the 'burden of the Mystery,' To this point was Wordsworth come, as far as I can conceive when he wrote 'Tintern Abbey' and it seems to me that his Genius is explorative of those dark Passages. Now if we live, and go on thinking, we too shall explore them. he is a Genius and superior to us, in so far as he can, more than we, make discoveries, and shed a light in them—Here I must think Wordsworth is deeper than Milton[.][4]

Keats understood Coleridge as searching for a single, higher-order truth or solution to the mysteries of the natural world. He went on to find the same fault in Dilke and Wordsworth. All these poets, he claimed, lacked objectivity and universality in their view of the human condition and the natural world. In each case, Keats found a mind which was a narrow private path, not a "thoroughfare for all thoughts". Lacking for Keats were the central and indispensable qualities requisite for flexibility and openness to the world, or what he referred to as negative capability.[5]

This concept of Negative Capability is precisely a rejection of set philosophies and preconceived systems of nature.[6] He demanded that the poet be receptive rather than searching for fact or reason, and to not seek absolute knowledge of every truth, mystery, or doubt.[7]

Why 'Negative'?Edit

It is not known why Keats settled on the phrase 'negative capability', but some scholars have hypothesized that Keats was influenced in his studies of medicine and chemistry, and that it refers to the negative pole of an electric current which is passive and receptive. In the same way that the negative pole receives the current from the positive pole, the poet receives impulses from a world that is full of mystery and doubt, which cannot be explained but which the poet can translate into art.[8]

Whatever the reason, modern psychological experiments indicate that his choice of the word Negative was truly inspired. If you put a composing poet in a functional magnetic resonance imager (fMRI), it turns out that the initial stage of poetic inspiration relates to something negative: the attenuation of self‐monitoring and top‐down attention, related to decreases in executive control mediated by deactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).[9] In this sense, Keats might be seen as providing an antidote to EM Forster's mantra of 'Only connect...'. Keats might be seen as saying 'Only disconnect...' from our well-worn certainties, from our hyperconnected world, from our executive control, and from our prefrontal cortex.[9][10]

Contrasted with positive capabilityEdit

When we are presented with external stress, our autonomic nervous system provides us with a 'fight or flight' response. This seems like a binary choice. But Keats provides us with a third way. Fight or flight has been called positive capability, and teachers of mindfulness stress the importance of cultivating negative capability in order to overcome and provide an alternative to our routine reactions to stress.[11] They point out that this teaches tolerance of uncertainty, and enriches decision making. Which is more important: negative or positive capability? Discussing this at length might be as sterile as debating which pole of a battery is more important: the positive or negative terminal? The point is: a battery is only a battery if it has both.

Why is it important?Edit

The sections below show that negative capability is not the exclusive preserve of poets, but can describe the pre-creative mood of any artist, scientist, or religious person. So negative capability is important as a wellspring of our humanity and an explanation of how periods of indolence give rise to periods of creativity.[8]:18

The competition (varieties of prepoetry)Edit

Negative capability needs to be understood as just one of a number of moods that may compete in the poet's mind before the poem arrives the—the phase we may call prepoetry, after the musical form of the same name which delights in 'uncertainties, mysteries, [and] doubts'.[12] The only valid way to approach this subject is through the words of poets themselves, eg:

Emotion recollected in tranquility (eg Wordswoth)
The systematic derangement of the senses (eg Rimbaud).
Automatic writing and thought transference (eg Yeats).
Frenzy[13] (eg Shakespeare).

The poet's eye, in fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven;
And as imagination bodies forth
forms of things unknown, the poet's pen
Turns them to shapes and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.

(A Midsummer Night's Dream, Act V scene 1, from line 1841)[14]

At one point Coleridge thought of the poet as Truth's Ventriloquist,[15] as if truth were in a cauldron. When it is stirred, eg by social events, truths bubble up and exit throgh the nearest poet, whose role is reduced to that of scribe. How to become the nearest poet? According to Coleridge, 2 grains of opium did the trick in the genesis of Kubla Khan.[16] (Don't try this at home: the wrong dose might be fatal, and opium addiction slowly destroyed Coleridge.)

Unger: The thesis of negative capabilityEdit

Roberto Mangabeira Unger appropriated Keats' term in order to explain resistance to rigid social divisions and hierarchies. For Unger, negative capability is the "denial of whatever in our contexts delivers us over to a fixed scheme of division and hierarchy and to an enforced choice between routine and rebellion." It is thus through negative capability that we can further empower ourselves against social and institutional constraints, and loosen the bonds that entrap us in a certain social station.[17]

An example of negative capability can be seen at work in industrial innovation. In order to create an innovator's advantage and develop new forms of economic enterprise, the modern industrialist could not just become more efficient with surplus extraction based on pre-existing work roles, but rather needed to invent new styles of flexible labor, expertise, and capital management. The industrialist needed to bring people together in new and innovative ways and redefine work roles and workplace organization. The modern factory had to, at once, stabilize its productive environment by inventing new restraints upon labor, such as length of the work day and division of tasks, but at the same time could not be too severe or risk being at a disadvantage to competitors, e.g. not being able to shift production tasks or capacity. Those industrialists and managers who were able to break old forms of organizational arrangements exercised negative capability.[18]

This thesis of negative capability is a key component in Unger's theory of false necessity and formative context. The theory of false necessity claims that our social worlds are the artifact of our own human endeavors. There is no pre-set institutional arrangement that our societies adhere to, and there is no necessary historical mold of development that they will follow. Rather we are free to choose and develop the forms and the paths that our societies will take through a process of conflicts and resolutions. However, there are groups of institutional arrangements that work together to bring out certain institutional forms, liberal democracy, for example. These forms are the basis of a social structure, and which Unger calls formative contexts. In order to explain how we move from one formative context to another without the conventional social theory constraints of historical necessity (e.g. feudalism to capitalism), and to do so while remaining true to the key insight of individual human empowerment and anti-necessitarian social thought, Unger recognized that there are an infinite number of ways of resisting social and institutional constraints, which can lead to an infinite number of outcomes. This variety of forms of resistance and empowerment (i.e. negative capability) make change possible.[19]

This thesis of negative capability addresses the problem of agency in relation to structure. It recognizes the constraints of structure and its molding influence upon the individual, but at the same time finds the individual able to resist, deny, and transcend their context. Unlike other theories of structure and agency, negative capability does not reduce the individual to a simple actor possessing only the dual capacity of compliance or rebellion, but rather sees him as able to partake in a variety of activities of self empowerment.[20]

BionEdit

The twentieth-century British psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion elaborated on Keats's term to illustrate an attitude of openness of mind which he considered of central importance, not only in the psychoanalytic session, but in life itself.[21] For Bion, negative capability was the ability to tolerate the pain and confusion of not knowing, rather than imposing ready-made or omnipotent certainties upon an ambiguous situation or emotional challenge.[22] His idea has been taken up more widely in the British Independent School,[23] as well as elsewhere in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy.[24]

In the context of ZenEdit

The notion of negative capability has been associated with Zen philosophy. Keats' man of negative capability had qualities that enabled him to "lose his self-identity, his 'imaginative identification' with and submission to things, and his power to achieve a unity with life". The Zen concept of satori is the outcome of passivity and receptivity, culminating in "sudden insight into the character of the real". Satori is reached without deliberate striving. The antecedent stages to satori: quest, search, ripening and explosion. The "quest" stage is accompanied by a strong feeling of uneasiness, resembling the capacity to practice negative capability while the mind is in a state of "uncertainties, mysteries and doubts". In the explosive stage (akin to Keats' 'chief intensity'), a man of negative capability effects a "fellowship with essence".[25]

In film, poems, songs, and popular cultureEdit

Keats's concept of negative capability was little known except to scholars, poets, and other careful readers, until 2 November 2018 when the British singer-songwriter Marianne Faithfull released her album entitled Negative Capability. Then, on 15 November 2020, the BBC aired the second installment of the second series of His Dark Materials based on the trilogy by Philip Pullman, of the same name.[26] Here the idea of negative capability is given great prominence, in what for the BBC was its most lavish production to date. It is presented not as an idea or a theory or a concept or a thesis, but as a mood which the heroine Lyra is able to sink into, and which enables her especial ability to read the rare and beautiful and truth-telling alethiometer. This device, like a nightingale, issues a code that cannot be understood by purely reductive means. Its beauty is part of its truth. Lyra visits the Dark Materials Research Laboratory where she meets the chief researcher, Mary Malone, who, has the uncanny abilty to see particles of dark matter, if she puts herself in the right mood. She tells Lyra "you can't see them unless you put your mind in a certain state. Do you know the poet John Keats? He has a phrase for it: negative capability. You have to hold your mind in a state of expectation without impatience..." The implication is that Keats's nightingale[27] is his alethiometer, whose truth, like the truth of poetry itself, is not amenable to any amount of vivisection. Philip Pullman has written that 'many poems are interrogated until they confess, and what they confess is usually worthless, as the results of torture always are: broken little scraps of information, platitudes, banalities'.[28] But if we can follow Lyra and Mary Malone, and put ourselves in the right mood, the dark materials between the lines may become visible or audible. This is the nightingale's code referred to in popular songs such as in one alternate-take version of Bob Dylan's Visions of Johanna[29] and also in the song of the woodthrush in TS Eliot's poem Marina.[30] in the latter's case 'where all the waters meet' is a neat confirmation of the negative polarity view of negative capability alluded to above. It is as if the poet's mind is the negative terminal or the sinkhole in which everything meets and is reconciled. The negativity here depends on the selfabnegation of the poet, and its that which allows the current to flow.

Perhaps the darkest evocation of the mood of negative capability in popular culture comes from Bob Dylan's song Not Dark Yet which is best listened to[31] rather than read. Bob Dylan has famously been called 'Keats with a guitar' by the New York Times and others,[32] and this song shows their close affinity through contiguous explorations of their respective negative capabilities.

CriticismEdit

Stanley Fish has expressed strong reservations about the attempt to apply the concept of negative capability to social contexts. He criticized Unger's early work as being unable to chart a route for the idea to pass into reality, which leaves history closed and the individual holding onto the concept while kicking against air. Fish finds the capability Unger invokes in his early works unimaginable and unmanufacturable that can only be expressed outright in blatant speech, or obliquely in concept.[33] More generally, Fish finds the idea of radical culture as an oppositional ideal in which context is continuously refined or rejected impracticable at best, and impossible at worst.[34] Unger has addressed these criticisms by developing a full theory of historical process in which negative capability is employed.[35]

In The Life in the Sonnets, David Fuller makes use of negative capability in addressing the qualities and potential of writing literary criticism. A critic's experience and feelings altogether form a strong framework to expand one's ability in critical thinking, while negative capability replaces the notion of correctness in analyzing literary texts.[36]

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ Li, Ou (2009). Keats and Negative Capability. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. ix.
  2. ^ Keats, John (1899). The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats, Cambridge Edition. Houghton, Mifflin and Company. p. 277. ISBN 978-1-146-96754-9.
  3. ^ Keats, John (1899). The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats, Cambridge Edition. Houghton, Mifflin and Company. p. 314. ISBN 978-1-146-96754-9.
  4. ^ Keats, John (1899). The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats, Cambridge Edition. Houghton, Mifflin and Company. p. 326. ISBN 978-1-146-96754-9.
  5. ^ Wigod, Jacob D. 1952. "Negative Capability and Wise Passiveness." PMLA 67 (4) (1 June): 384–386
  6. ^ Starr, Nathan Comfort (1966). "Negative Capability in Keats's Diction". Keats-Shelley Journal. 15: 59–68. JSTOR 30209856.
  7. ^ Goellnicht, Donald. "Negative Capability and Wise Passiveness" MA Thesis. (McMaster University, 1976), 5, 11–12. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9563
  8. ^ a b Goellnicht, Donald. "Negative Capability and Wise Passiveness" MA Thesis. (McMaster University, 1976), 13. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9563
  9. ^ a b Liu, Siyuan; Erkkinen, Michael G.; Healey, Meghan L.; Xu, Yisheng; Swett, Katherine E.; Chow, Ho Ming; Braun, Allen R. (26 May 2015). "Brain activity and connectivity during poetry composition: Toward a multidimensional model of the creative process". Human Brain Mapping. 36 (9): 3351–3372. doi:10.1002/hbm.22849. ISSN 1065-9471. PMC 4581594. PMID 26015271.
  10. ^ "'Only connect'? Forsterian ideology in an age of hyperconnectivity". HumanistLife. 9 April 2014. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
  11. ^ "Negative capability – why it is more positive than you might think -". Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  12. ^ "Pre-poetry". Youtube. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  13. ^ "poetic frenzy - definition - English". Glosbe. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  14. ^ "Midsummer Night's Dream, Act V, Scene 1 :|: Open Source Shakespeare". www.opensourceshakespeare.org. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  15. ^ Hodgson, John (1999). "An Other Voice: Ventriloquism in the Romantic Period". Romanticism on the Net (16): 0. doi:10.7202/005878ar. ISSN 1467-1255.
  16. ^ "Manuscript of S T Coleridge's 'Kubla Khan'". The British Library. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
  17. ^ Unger, Roberto (2004). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, Revised Edition. London: Verso. pp. 279–280, 632. ISBN 978-1-85984-331-4.
  18. ^ Unger, Roberto (2004). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, Revised Edition. London: Verso. pp. 299–301. ISBN 978-1-85984-331-4.
  19. ^ Unger, Roberto (2004). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, Revised Edition. London: Verso. pp. 35–36, 164, 169, 278–80, 299–301. ISBN 978-1-85984-331-4.
  20. ^ Unger, Roberto (2004). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, Revised Edition. London: Verso. p. 282. ISBN 978-1-85984-331-4.
  21. ^ Joan and Neville Symington, The Clinical Thinking of Wilfrid Bion (1996) p. 169
  22. ^ Meg Harris Williams, The Aesthetic Development (2009)
  23. ^ Patrick Casement, Further Learning from the Patient (London 1990) p. 10 and p. 13-4
  24. ^ [1]
  25. ^ Benton, R. P. (1966). "Keats and Zen". Philosophy East and West. 16 (1/2): 33–47. doi:10.2307/1397137. JSTOR 1397137.
  26. ^ His Dark Materials, Series 2: 2. The Cave: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000pk3m via @bbciplayer. See especially position 26.49
  27. ^ Foundation, Poetry (17 November 2020). "Ode to a Nightingale by John Keats". Poetry Foundation. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  28. ^ "Philip Pullman's introduction to Paradise Lost". The British Library. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  29. ^ Src='https://Secure.gravatar.com/Avatar/Bf0de9af3a99711feedf028897256958?s=60, <img Alt; #038;d=mm; Srcset='https://Secure.gravatar.com/Avatar/Bf0de9af3a99711feedf028897256958?s=120, #038;r=g'; #038;d=mm; Says, #038;r=g 2x' Class='avatar Avatar-60 Photo' Height=60 Width=60 Loading=lazy> Rodg (23 October 2016). "Three Visions of Johanna". The Panoptic. Retrieved 18 November 2020.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ "Poem: Marina by T. S. Eliot". www.poetrynook.com. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  31. ^ "Not Dark Yet". Youtube. Retrieved 18 November 2020. |first= missing |last= (help)
  32. ^ "Not Dark Yet: Bob Dylan as 20th century Keats, and the memories that still linger | Untold Dylan". Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  33. ^ S. Fish, "Unger and Milton", in Doing What Comes Naturally (1989): 430
  34. ^ H. Aram Veeser ed., The Stanley Fish Reader (Oxford 1999) p.216-7
  35. ^ Unger, Roberto (2004). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, Revised Edition. London: Verso. ISBN 978-1-85984-331-4.
  36. ^ "Dwelling in/on Reading".

Further readingEdit

  • A. C. Bradley, 'The Letters of Keats' in Oxford Lectures on Poetry (1965[1909])
  • W.J. Bate, Negative Capability: The Intuitive Approach in Keats. Intro by Maura Del Serra (New York: Contra Mundum Press, 2012).
  • S. Fish, "Unger and Milton", in Doing What Comes Naturally (1989): 339–435.
  • Li Ou, Keats and Negative Capability (2009)
  • Unger, Roberto (1984). Passion: An Essay on Personality. New York: Free Press. ISBN 978-0-02-933120-0.
  • Unger, Roberto (1987). Social Theory, Its Situation and Its Task. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-32974-3.
  • Wigod, Jacob D. 1952. "Negative Capability and Wise Passiveness". Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. 67 (4): 383–390.