Native American mascot controversy
The use of terms and images referring to Native Americans and First Nations as the name or mascot for a sports team is a topic of public controversy in the United States and Canada. Since the 1960s, as part of the indigenous civil rights movements, there have been a number of protests and other actions by Native Americans and their supporters. The protests target the prominent use of such names and images by professional franchises such as the Cleveland Indians (in particular their "Chief Wahoo" logo, which is now officially retired); and the Washington Redskins (the term "redskins" being defined in most American English dictionaries as "derogatory slang"). Changes, such as the retirement of Native American names and mascots in a wide array of schools, has been a steady trend since the 1970s.
The issue is often discussed in the media only in terms of the offensiveness of certain terms, images, and performances to individuals of Native American heritage, which tends to reduce the problem to one of feelings and personal opinions. This prevents a more comprehensive understanding of the history and context of the use of Native American names and images, and the reasons why sports teams should eliminate the utilization of such terms. Social science research says that sports mascots and images, rather than being mere entertainment, are important symbols with deeper psychological and social effects. The accumulation of research on the harm done has led to over 115 professional organizations representing civil rights, educational, athletic, and scientific experts adopting resolutions or policies that state that the use of Native American names and/or symbols by non-native sports teams is a form of ethnic stereotyping that promotes misunderstanding and prejudice which contributes to other problems faced by Native Americans.
Defenders of the current usage often state their intention to honor Native Americans by referring to positive traits, such as fighting spirit and being strong, brave, stoic, dedicated, and proud; while opponents see these traits as being based upon stereotypes of Native Americans as savages. In general, the social sciences recognize that all stereotypes, whether positive or negative, are harmful because they promote false or misleading associations between a group and an attribute, fostering a disrespectful relationship. The injustice of such stereotypes is recognized with regard to other racial or ethnic groups, thus mascots are morally questionable regardless of offense being taken by individuals. Defenders of the status quo also state that the issue is not important, being only about sports, and that the opposition is nothing more than "political correctness", which change advocates argue ignores the extensive evidence of harmful effects of stereotypes and bias. Although there has been a steady decline in the number of teams doing so, Native American images and nicknames nevertheless remain fairly common in American and Canadian sports, and may be found in use at all levels, from youth teams to professional sports franchises.
European Americans have had a history of "playing Indian" that dates back to the colonial period. In the 19th century, fraternal organizations such as the Tammany Societies and the Improved Order of Red Men adopted the words and material culture of Native Americans in part to establish an aboriginal identity, while ignoring the dispossession and conquest of indigenous peoples. This practice spread to youth groups, such as the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) (in particular, the Order of the Arrow) and many summer camps. University students in the late 19th and early 20th centuries adopted Indian names and symbols for their sports teams, not from authentic sources but rather as Native American life was imagined by European Americans.
Professional team nicknames had similar origins. In professional baseball the team that is now the Atlanta Braves was founded as the Boston Red Stockings in 1871; becoming the Boston Braves in 1912. Their owner at that time, James Gaffney, was a member of New York City's political machine, Tammany Hall, one of the societies formed to honor Tamanend, a chief of the Delaware. The team that moved to become the Washington Redskins in 1937 was originally also known as the Boston Braves since the football and baseball teams played at Braves Field. After moving to Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, the team name was changed to the Boston Redskins in 1933, using a "red" identifier while retaining the Braves "Indian Head" logo. While defenders of the Redskins often cite coach William Henry Dietz, who claimed Native American heritage, to justify the name; the use of Native American names and imagery by this NFL team began in 1932 before hiring Dietz in 1933.
The Cleveland Indians' name originated from a request by club owner Charles Somers to baseball writers to choose a new name to replace the "Naps" following the departure of their star player Nap Lajoie after the 1914 season. The name "Indians" was chosen as it was one of the nicknames previously applied to the old Cleveland Spiders baseball club during the time when Louis Sockalexis, a member of the Penobscot tribe of Maine, played for Cleveland. The success of the Boston Braves in the 1914 World Series may have been another reason for adopting an Indian mascot. The story that the team is named to honor Sockalexis, as the first Native American to play Major League Baseball, cannot be verified from historical documents. The news stories published to announce the selection in 1915 make no mention of Sockalexis, but do make many racist and insulting references to Native Americans.
The stereotyping of Native Americans must be understood in the context of history which includes conquest, forced relocation, and organized efforts to eradicate native cultures, such as the boarding schools of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which separated young Native Americans from their families in order to educate them as European Americans. As stated in an editorial by Carter Meland (Anishinaabe heritage) and David E. Wilkins (Lumbee) both professors of American Indian Studies at the University of Minnesota: "Since the first Europeans made landfall in North America, native peoples have suffered under a weltering array of stereotypes, misconceptions and caricatures. Whether portrayed as noble savages, ignoble savages, teary-eyed environmentalists or, most recently, simply as casino-rich, native peoples find their efforts to be treated with a measure of respect and integrity undermined by images that flatten complex tribal, historical and personal experience into one-dimensional representations that tells us more about the depicters than about the depicted."
In the 1940s, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) created a campaign to eliminate negative stereotyping of Native American people in the media. Over time, the campaign began to focus on Indian names and mascots in sports. The NCAI maintains that teams with mascots such as the Braves and the Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native American people and demean their native traditions and rituals. "Often citing a long-held myth by non-Native people that "Indian" mascots "honor Native people," American sports businesses such as the NFL's Washington 'Redskins' and Kansas City 'Chiefs', MLB's Cleveland 'Indians' and Atlanta 'Braves', and the NHL's Chicago Black Hawks, continue to profit from harmful stereotypes originated during a time when white superiority and segregation were commonplace."
Several of the founders of the American Indian Movement, including Clyde Bellecourt, Vernon Bellecourt, Dennis Banks and Russel Means, were among the first to protest names and mascots such as the Washington Redskins and Chief Wahoo. Vernon Bellecourt also founded the National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media (NCARSM) in 1989. Cornel Pewewardy (Comanche-Kiowa), Professor and Director of Indigenous Nations Studies at Portland State University, cites indigenous mascots as an example of dysconscious racism which, by placing images of Native American or First Nations people into an invented media context, continues to maintain the superiority of the dominant culture. Such practices can be seen as a form of cultural imperialism or neocolonialism.
Native mascots are also part of the larger issues of cultural appropriation and the violation of indigenous intellectual property rights, which includes all instances where non-natives use indigenous music, art, costumes, etc. in entertainment and commerce. It has been argued that harm to Native Americans occurs because the appropriation of Native culture by the majority society continues the systems of dominance and subordination that have been used to colonize, assimilate, and oppress indigenous groups. Some see the use of caricatures of Native Americans as sports mascots as contributing to their political and economic marginalization. Where other minorities would be consulted, decisions impacting Native Americans, such as building the Dakota Access Pipeline, are made while excluding Native concerns. Another incident cited as indicative of the misunderstanding of Native American legal status because of stereotyping is the Baby Veronica case, in which a child was adopted by a white family without the consent of her father, an enrolled member of the Cherokee Nation.
Not all Native Americans are united in total opposition to mascots. Steven Denson, a professor at Southern Methodist University and member of the Chickasaw nation, while not issuing a blanket endorsement, has nevertheless stated that there are acceptable ways to use Native American mascots if it is done in a respectful and tasteful manner. He states: "I believe it is acceptable if used in a way that fosters understanding and increased positive awareness of the Native-American culture. And it must also be done with the support of the Native-American community. There is a way to achieve a partnership that works together to achieve mutually beneficial goals." The NCAI recognized the right of individual tribes to established relationships with teams which allowed them to retain their names.
Social sciences and educationEdit
The damage caused by the use of Native American mascots, particularly in an academic context, was stated by the Society of Indian Psychologists in 1999:
Stereotypical and historically inaccurate images of Indians, in general, interfere with learning about them by creating, supporting and maintaining oversimplified and inaccurate views of indigenous peoples and their cultures. When stereotypical representations are taken as factual information, they contribute to the development of cultural biases and prejudices, (clearly a contradiction to the educational mission of the University.) In the same vein, we believe that continuation of the use of Indians as symbols and mascots is incongruous with the philosophy espoused by many Americans as promoting inclusivity and diversity.
Sports mascots have been cited as an example of microaggressions, the everyday insults that members of marginalized minority groups are subject to in the comments and actions of other groups in society.
In 2005, the American Psychological Association (APA) issued a resolution "Recommending the Immediate Retirement of American Indian Mascots, Symbols, Images, and Personalities by Schools, Colleges, Universities, Athletic Teams, and Organizations" due to the harm done by creating a hostile environment, the negative impact on the self-esteem of American Indian children, and discrimination that may violate civil rights. It also impacts non-natives by reinforcing mainstream stereotypes, preventing learning about Native American culture. The APA states that stereotyping is disrespectful of the beliefs, traditions and values of Native Americans. Similar resolutions have been adopted by the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport, the American Sociological Association, the American Counseling Association, and the American Anthropological Association. In a 2005 report on the status of Native American students, the National Education Association included the elimination of Indian mascots and sports team names as one of its recommendations. In 2018, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation announced it would no longer consider teams with racist mascots, such as the Kansas City and Washington football teams, for its annual RWJF Sports Award, which recognizes organizations that contribute to public health through sports.
Social science research gives weight to the perceptions of those directly affected. In particular, studies support the view that sports mascots and images are not trivial. Stereotyping directly affects academic performance and self-esteem, which contribute to all of the other issues faced by Native Americans, including suicide, unemployment, and poverty. European Americans exposed to mascots are more likely to believe not only that stereotypes are true, but that Native Americans have no identity beyond these stereotypes. Two studies examining the effect of exposure to an American Indian sports mascot found a tendency to endorse stereotypes of a different minority group (Asian Americans), which is indicative of a "spreading effect". Exposure to any stereotypes increased the likelihood of stereotypical thinking; demonstrating the harm done to society by stereotyping of any kind. A connection between stereotyping and racism of any group increasing the likelihood of stereotyping others was made by Native Americans opposing the "Indians" mascot in Skowhegan, Maine when fliers promoting the KKK were distributed in that town.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) passed a resolution calling for the end of the use of Native American names, images, and mascots in 1999.
In 2001, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights released an advisory opinion calling for an end to the use of Native American images and team names by non-Native schools. While recognizing the right to freedom of expression, the commission also recognizes those Native Americans and civil rights advocates that maintain these mascots, by promoting stereotypes, may violate anti-discrimination laws. When found in educational institutions, mascots may also create a hostile environment inconsistent with learning to respect diverse cultures, but instead teach that stereotypes that misrepresent a minority group are permissible. Those schools that claim that their sports imagery stimulate interest in Native American culture have not listened to Native groups and civil rights leaders who point out that even purportedly positive stereotypes both present a false portrayal of the past and prevent understanding of contemporary Native people as fellow Americans.
In a report issued in 2012, a United Nations expert on Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples cited the continued use of Native American references by sports team as a part of the stereotyping that "obscures understanding of the reality of Native Americans today and instead help to keep alive racially discriminatory attitudes." Justice Murray Sinclair, the head of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission said in 2015 "sports teams with offensive names, such as Redskins and cartoonish aboriginal-looking mascots have no place in a country trying to come to grips with racism in its past".
While all advocates for elimination of Native mascots agree that the practice is morally wrong, many do not find a basis for legal remedy. Civil rights law in the United States reflect the difference between the experience of racism by African Americans and Native Americans. The effects of slavery continued after emancipation in the form of discrimination that insured a continued source of cheap labor. What European Americans wanted from Native Americans was not labor but land, and many were willing to have native people themselves assimilate. Continued discrimination came to those who refused to do so, but asserted their separate identity and rights of sovereignty. The appropriation of native cultures is therefore seen as discriminatory practice by some but is not understood as such by those that think of assimilation as a positive process. The difference is reflected in the continued popularity of Native Americans as mascots when similar usage of the names and images of any other ethnic group, in particular African Americans, would be unthinkable, and the continued claim that the stereotype of the "noble savage" honors Native Americans.
In February 2013, the Michigan Department of Civil Rights (MDCR) filed a complaint with the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR). MDCR's complaint asserted that new research clearly establishes that use of American Indian imagery negatively impacts student learning, creating an unequal learning environment in violation of Article VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In June 2013, the OCR dismissed the case on the basis that the legal standard required not only harm, but the intent to do harm, which was not established.
A legal claim of discrimination rests upon a group agreeing that a particular term or practice is offensive, thus opponents of mascot change often point to individuals claiming Native American heritage who say they are not offended. This raised the difficulty of Native American identity in the United States, also an evolving controversy.
In 1992, the Central Conference of American Rabbis issued a resolution calling for the end of sports teams names that promote racism, in particular the Atlanta Braves and the Washington Redskins. In 2001, the Unitarian Universalist Association passed a resolution to establish relationships with groups working to end the use of Indian images and symbols for sports and media mascots. In 2004, the United Methodist Church also passed a resolution condemning the use of Native American team names and sports mascots, which was highlighted in a meeting of the Black caucus of that organization in 2007.
Rev. Alvin Deer (Kiowa/Creek), United Methodist Church
A group of sixty-one religious leaders in Washington, D.C. sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Redskins owner Daniel Snyder stating their moral obligation to join the "Change the Mascot" movement due to the offensive and inappropriate nature of the name which causes pain whether or not that is intended.
Members of the Indian Affairs Committee of the Baltimore Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends approved a formal statement condemning the name of the Washington football team, stating that "the NFL has violated its core principles for decades by allowing the team playing in Washington, D.C., to carry the name 'redskins,' a racist epithet that insults millions of Native Americans. Continued use of the term encourages and perpetuates persecution, disrespect, and bigotry against Native men, women, and children". The Torch Committee, the student government organization of the Sandy Spring Friends School in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, voted to ban any apparel on the campus which includes the Redskins name, although the logo would continue to be allowed.
In a meeting March 1, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Central Atlantic Conference of the United Church of Christ (UCC) unanimously passed a resolution proposing that its members boycott Washington Redskins games and shun products bearing the team's logo until the team changes its name and mascot. Redskin's spokesman Tony Wyllie offered a response, saying, "We respect those who disagree with our team's name, but we wish the United Church of Christ would listen to the voice of the overwhelming majority of Americans, including Native Americans, who support our name and understand it honors the heritage and tradition of the Native American community." At its annual meeting in June 2014, the membership of the UCC also passed a resolution supporting the boycott. The resolution and boycott was passed by the National Synod of the UCC in June, 2015.
The topic became an issue on a national level in the twenty-first century, with a hearing before the US Senate Committee on Indian Affairs in 2011, and a symposium at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian in 2013. In November, 2015 President Obama, speaking at the White House Tribal Nations Conference, stated "Names and mascots of sports teams like the Washington Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native Americans" and praised Adidas for a new initiative to help schools change names and mascots by designing new logos and paying for part of the cost of new uniforms.
Mainstream opinion reflects the function of identification with a sports team in both individual and group psychology. There are many benefits associated with sports fandom, both private (increased self-esteem) and public (community solidarity). The activity of viewing sporting events provide shared experiences that reinforce personal and group identification with a team. The name, mascot, cheerleaders, and marching band performances reinforce and become associated with these shared experiences. Daniel Snyder explicitly invokes these associations with family, friends, and an 81-year tradition as being the most important reasons for keeping the Redskins name. When self-esteem becomes bound to the players and the team, there are many beneficial but also some unfortunate consequences, including denial or rationalization of misbehavior. However, for some, the identity being expressed is one of supremacy, with the defense of native mascots being clearly racist.
Some individuals who support the use of Native American mascots state that they are meant to be respectful, and to pay homage to Native American people. Many have made the argument that Native American mascots focus on bravery, courage and fighting skills rather than anything derogatory. Karl Swanson, then vice-president of the Washington Redskins professional football team, declared in the magazine Sports Illustrated that his team's name "symbolizes courage, dignity, and leadership", and that the "Redskins symbolize the greatness and strength of a grand people".
However, many note that the behavior of fans at games is not respectful. Richard Lapchick, director emeritus of Northeastern University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society, in an article: "Could you imagine people mocking African Americans in black face at a game? Yet go to a game where there is a team with an Indian name and you will see fans with war paint on their faces. Is this not the equivalent to black face?"
Others claim Native American mascots help promote the culture to those who might be unaware of its significance. Chief Illiniwek, the former athletic symbol for the University of Illinois, became the subject of protest in 1988. In 1990 the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois called the mascot a dignified symbol: "His ceremonial dance is done with grace and beauty. The Chief keeps the memory of the people of a great Native American tribe alive for thousands of Illinoisans who otherwise would know little or nothing of them." However, the mascot costume was not based on the clothing of the people of the Illinois Confederation, but an imitation of the clothing of the Lakota people, and the first three men to portray Illiniwek were not performing authentic Native American dances, but routines they had learned from other non-Native hobbyists in the Boy Scouts of America. The Peoria people are the closest living descendants of the Illiniwek Confederacy. In response to requests by those who had portrayed the mascot to bring back occasional performances, Peoria Chief John P. Froman reaffirmed the tribe's position that Chief (Illiniwek) "was not in any way representative of Peoria culture".
Other team names and ethnic groupsEdit
Many argue there is a double standard in Native Americans being so frequently used as a sports team name or mascot when the same usage would be unthinkable for other racial or ethnic group. One current exception is the Coachella Valley High School "Arabs" which has also been the subject of controversy, resulting in the retirement of its more cartoonish representations.
The University of Notre Dame Fighting Irish and the University of Louisiana at Lafayette's "Ragin' Cajuns" are sometimes cited as counter-arguments to those that favor change. However, rather than referring to "others" these teams employ symbols that European American cultures have historically used to represent themselves. The University of Notre Dame mascot, the University of Notre Dame leprechaun is a mythical being that represents the Irish, which is both an ethnic and a national group. The University of Louisiana at Lafayette mascot is an anthropomorphic cayenne pepper, an ingredient frequently found in Cajun cuisine. Opponents also see this argument as a false equivalency, because it ignores systemic inequality, and serves to discount the Native American voice by saying that if one group isn't hurt by a particular portrayal, then no group has the right to be hurt, regardless of vastly different backgrounds, treatment, and social positions.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights call for an end to the use of Native American mascots was only for non-native schools. In cases where universities were founded to educate Native Americans, such mascots may not be examples of cultural appropriation or stereotyping. Examples include the Fighting Indians of the Haskell Indian Nations University and the University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP), which continues to have a substantial number of native students, and close ties to the Lumbee tribe. The UNCP nickname is the Braves, but the mascot is a red-tailed hawk. Pembroke Middle School, which also has close ties to the Lumbee tribe, is nicknamed the Warriors.
Financial impact of changeEdit
Many supporters of Native American mascots feel that the financial cost of changing mascots would outweigh the benefits. Sales of merchandise with team mascots and nicknames generate millions of dollars in sales each year, and teams contend that a change in team mascots would render this merchandise useless. The cost of removing images from uniforms and all other items, which must be paid out of local school funds, is a greater factor for secondary schools. Opponents feel that despite the cost of a change in team mascots, it should be done to prevent what they believe is racial stereotyping. Clyde Bellecourt, when director of the American Indian Movement stated: "It's the behavior that accompanies all of this that's offensive. The rubber tomahawks, the chicken feather headdresses, people wearing war paint and making these ridiculous war whoops with a tomahawk in one hand and a beer in the other; all of these have significant meaning for us. And the psychological impact it has, especially on our youth, is devastating."
A study done by the Emory University Goizueta Business School indicates that the growing unpopularity of Native American mascots is a financial drain for professional teams, losing money compared to more popular animal mascots. Writing for Forbes in response to the statewide mascot ban passed by Maine in 2019, marketing analyst Henry DeVries compares Native mascots to the retired "Frito Bandito" mascot, and argues that "offensive marketing mascots" are a bad idea financially and "on the wrong side of history."
Public opinion surveysEdit
A survey conducted in 2002 by The Harris Poll for Sports Illustrated (SI) found that 81 percent of Native Americans who live outside traditional Indian reservations and 53 percent of Indians on reservations did not find the images discriminatory. The authors of the article concluded that "Although most Native American activists and tribal leaders consider Indian team names and mascots offensive, neither Native Americans in general nor a cross section of U.S. sports fans agree". According to the article, "There is a near total disconnect between Indian activists and the Native American population on this issue." An Indian activist commented on the results saying "that Native Americans' self-esteem has fallen so low that they don't even know when they're being insulted". Soon after the SI article, a group of five social scientists experienced in researching the mascot issue published a journal article arguing against the validity of this survey and its conclusions. First they state that "The confidence with which the magazine asserts that a 'disconnect' between Native American activists and Native Americans exists on this issue belies the serious errors in logic and accuracy made in the simplistic labeling of Native Americans who oppose mascots as 'activists.'"
A flaw unique to polls of Native Americans is they rely upon self-identification to select the target population. In an editorial in the Bloomington Herald Times, Steve Russell (an enrolled Cherokee citizen and associate professor of criminal justice at Indiana University), states that both SI and Annenberg's samples of "self-identified Native Americans ... includes plenty of people who have nothing to do with Indians". Individuals claiming to be Native American when they are not is well known in academic research, and people claiming Indian identity specifically to gain authority in the debate over sports mascots has been criticised.
At the Center for Indigenous Peoples Studies at California State University, San Bernardino a survey has conducted of 400 individuals whose identity as Native American was verified, finding that 67% agreed with the statement that "Redskins" is offensive and racist. The response from non-natives was almost the opposite, with 68% responding that the name is not offensive. In a 2020 study at UC Berkeley 49% of self-identified Native Americans responded that the Washington Redskins name was offensive or very offensive, while only 38% were not bothered by it. However, for study participants who were heavily engaged in their native or tribal cultures, 67% said they were offended, for young people 60%, and those with tribal affiliations 52%. 
While protests began in the 1970s, national attention to the issue did not occur until widespread television coverage of college and professional games brought the behaviour of some fans to the attention of Native Americans. The appearance of the Atlanta Braves in the 1991 World Series and the Washington Redskins at the 1992 Super Bowl prompted the largest response because the games were played in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which has a large Native American population.
The documents most often cited to justify the elimination of Native mascots are the advisory opinion by the United States Commission on Civil Rights in 2001 and a resolution by the American Psychological Association in 2005. Neither of these documents refer to subjective perceptions of offensiveness, but to scientific evidence of harms and legal definitions of discrimination. However, the issue is often discussed in the media in terms of feelings and opinions, and prevents full understanding of the history and context of the use of Native American names and images and why their use by sports teams should be eliminated.
Individual school districts have responded to complaints by local Native American individuals and tribes, or have made changes due to an increased awareness of the issue among educators and students. New Native mascots have not been proposed in recent decades, or are withdrawn before becoming official due to public opposition. For example, in 2016 when one of the teams in the National College Prospects Hockey League (NCPHL) was announced as the Lake Erie Warriors with a caricature Mohawk logo it was immediate changed to the Lake Erie Eagles. Little League International has updated its 2019 rulebook to include a statement prohibiting "the use of team names, mascots, nicknames or logos that are racially insensitive, derogatory or discriminatory in nature." This decision has been applauded by the National Congress of American Indians. In February, 2019 US Lacrosse issued a position statement which said in part "As the sport’s national governing body, US Lacrosse believes that the misuse of Native American nicknames, logos, and mascots reflect and promote misleading stereotypes that are degrading and harmful to Native Americans. We will make every effort to assure that offensive or stereotypical mascots and logos will not be visible or promoted at events that US Lacrosse controls."
Legal and administrative actionEdit
Statewide laws or school board decisions regarding team names and mascots have passed in states with significant Native American populations; including California (2015), Colorado (2014), Oregon (2012), and Michigan (2012). However, opposing the trend for change, in response to the Tennessee Commission of Indian Affairs seeking a ban though the Tennessee Human Rights Commission, the Tennessee Senate passed a law allowing only elected officials to take any action banning school teams using American Indian names and symbols. The Wisconsin law passed in 2010 meant to eliminate "race-based nicknames, logos and mascots" was revised in 2013 making change much more difficult. In the original law, a single individual could file a complaint with the burden of proof on the school to defend their mascot, in the new law a petition signed by 10% of the school district residents is needed, and the petitioners need to prove discrimination.
Secondary schools and youth leaguesEdit
Secondary schools in both the United States and Canada have had histories similar to colleges, some changing voluntarily while others maintain their current mascots. An analysis of a database in 2013 indicates that there are currently more than 2,000 high schools with mascots that reference Native American culture, compared to around 3,000 fifty years ago.
In addition to moving to changing their own mascots, school boards in Ontario are also considering a ban on students wearing any articles bearing offensive names or logos, be they professional or local teams.
Ian Campeau, an Ojibway musician and activist in Ottawa, Ontario, filed a human rights complaint against the Nepean Redskins Football Club on behalf of his five-year-old daughter in an effort to get the team to change its name. "How are they going to differentiate the playing field from the school yard? What's going to stop them from calling my daughter a redskin in the school yard? That's as offensive as using the n-word." Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn Atleo said he supports the move because the word Redskin is "offensive and hurtful and completely inappropriate. The team was changed to the "Nepean Eagles", chosen from 70 suggestions submitted. Niigaan Sinclair (Anishinaabe), a writer and assistant professor at the University of Manitoba, applauded the decision and contrasted it to the decision of Daniel Snyder, the Washington team owner.
In January, 2020 the school board of Killingly High School, Killingly, Connecticut, now with a Republican majority, voted to reinstate the Redmen mascot. The vote reflects a generational split, the new school board members representing mainly older alumni, while current students, faculty and Native Americans support changing the mascot. A senior active in the debate stated “We look racist...this is not what I want our school to be known for.” The mascot had been removed after input from the Nipmuc Tribal Council that no Native mascots are flattering. In October, "Red Hawks" was chosen initially as the new mascot, but after a contentious meeting in December the Board decided to have no mascot. Renewed discussion of whether the mascot is offensive had begun in June 2019, prompted by a student initiative. However, the name change became an issue in the 2019 municipal elections, leading to record turnout and Republican victories.
After receiving statements in opposition to the "Indians" name from the Penobscot Nation and the ACLU of Maine, the school board voted in March 2019 to eliminate the mascot at Skowhegan Area High School. With the removal of Native American imagery associated with the "Warriors" name at other high schools, Maine becomes the first state to eliminate indigenous mascots in all secondary schools. A bill to ban Native American mascots in all public schools passed the Maine House of Representatives and Senate and was signed into law by Governor Janet Mills in May, 2019.
Due to the media coverage of the Washington Redskins, high schools with the name Redskins have received particular attention, including three which have a majority of Native American students. Advocates for the name conclude that because some Native Americans use the name to refer to themselves, it is not insulting. However, the principal of one of these, Red Mesa High School in Teec Nos Pos, Arizona, said that use of the word outside American Indian communities should be avoided because it could perpetuate "the legacy of negativity that the term has created."
Relationships with tribes to retain Native names have been established at the high school level. Arapahoe High School (Centennial, Colorado) now uses a logo provided by the Arapaho Tribe of Wyoming, which initially included an agreement that the image would not be placed on the gym floor or any article of clothing. The latter provision has not always been observed, but the logo does not appear on the team uniforms. The agreement also includes tribal participation in school events. A similar agreement has been worked out between the Northern Arapahoe Tribe and the Strasburg High School " Indians" in Strasburg, Colorado.
An exceptional case is the Salamanca Central High School "Warriors" in the city of Salamanca, New York. The city is within the boundaries of the Allegany Indian Reservation of the Seneca Nation of Indians, and 26% of the high school students are Native American. In 2001, when the commissioner of the New York State Education Department sent a letter to all New York school boards calling for the elimination of Native American mascots, the Seneca Nation Tribal Council joined with other members of the community in seeking to retain the Warrior imagery, although with individual differences of opinion. Salamanca may be unique in having a mixed but not fully integrated community, with the Warrior identity combining elements negotiated between the Seneca and non-Seneca population. For example, the school logo now depicts a Seneca man, replacing the stereotypical Plains Indian warrior image that was used prior to 1978.
Colleges and universitiesEdit
Some college teams voluntarily changed their names and mascots. Stanford University had "The Stanford Indian" as its mascot from 1930 to 1972. Today Stanford's athletic team identity is built around the "Stanford Cardinal", reflecting the primary school color that has been used from the earliest days, while the unofficial mascot shown on its primary logo is the Stanford Tree. Another early change was the "Saltine Warrior" that represented Syracuse University from 1931 until 1978. After a brief attempt to use a Roman warrior, the mascot became Otto the Orange for the school color. Miami University began discussion regarding the propriety of the Redskins name and images in 1972, and changed its team nickname to RedHawks in 1996.
Although Dartmouth College had not used an Indian mascot for many years, Yale University printed a program for the 2016 game commemorating its 100th game against Dartmouth showing historical program covers featuring depictions of Native Americans that are now viewed as racist.
The Florida State Seminoles of Florida State University use names and images associated with the Seminole people. The use is officially sanctioned by the Seminole Tribe of Florida even though the NCAA "continues to believe the stereotyping of Native Americans is wrong."
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationEdit
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) distributed a "self evaluation" to 31 colleges in 2005, for teams to examine the use of potentially offensive imagery with their mascot choice. Nineteen teams were cited as having potentially "hostile or abusive" names, mascots, or images, that would be banned from displaying them during post-season play, and prohibited from hosting tournaments. Subsequently, all of the colleges previously using Native American imagery changed except for those granted waivers when they obtained official support from individual tribes based upon the principle of tribal sovereignty.
San Diego State University (SDSU) was not cited by the NCAA in 2005 due to a decision that the Aztecs were not a Native American tribe with any living descendants. However, in February 2017 the SDSU Native American Student Alliance (NASA) supported removal of the mascot, calling its continued use "institutional racism" in its official statement to the Committee on Diversity, Equity and Outreach. A task force of students, faculty, and alumni was appointed to study the issue and make a recommendation by April, 2018. The recommendation was to keep the mascot but take steps to use only respectful references to Aztec culture, however there are few signs of this being implemented.
Few professional teams using Native names and imagery remain, several changing when they moved to other cities, while others went out of business. The Atlanta Hawks were originally the Tri-Cities Blackhawks (using an "Indian" logo), and the Clippers were originally the Buffalo Braves. The Golden State Warriors eliminated Native American imagery in 1971. The United States national rugby league team was known as the Tomahawks until 2015, when USA Rugby League replaced the American National Rugby League as the sport's governing body in the U.S. and chose the simpler Hawks as the new name for the team.
The Atlanta Braves remain the home of the tomahawk chop (although it began at Florida State University). The logo has changed through the years from an Indian in full headdress to an Indian with a Mohawk hairstyle and single feather (described as either laughing or shouting), then to the Braves name in script over a tomahawk. The mascot Chief Noc-A-Homa was replaced in 1986 by a baseball-headed "Homer the Brave", and in 2018 by "Blooper".
The tomahawk chop and the accompanying chant has not been without controversy. In February, 2019 after the removal of the Cleveland Indians' Chief Wahoo logo, MLB commissioner Rob Manfred said "The Braves have taken steps to take out the tomahawk chop". In October, St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Ryan Helsley, a member of the Cherokee Nation, stated his belief that the tomahawk chop and chant misrepresents Native Americans. In response to this complaint, the Atlanta Braves, in their October 9 game against the Cardinals, did not provide fans with foam tomahawks, although the music accompanying the chant was played while fans performed the arm gesture. When the Braves lost to the Cardinals 13-1, the San Francisco Bay Area Fox affiliate used the headline "Braves Scalped", drawing criticism as an example of why most Native Americans oppose the use of American Indian imagery and mascots in sports. The station soon apologized. The team front office has stated that there will be talks with Native Americans during the off-season regarding the tomahawk chop tradition, while leaders of two tribes that once inhabited Georgia, the Cherokee and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation agree that the tradition is inappropriate.
Native American rights advocate Suzan Shown Harjo (Cheyenne and Hodulgee Muscogee) says the Chicago Blackhawks have escaped the scrutiny given to other teams using Native imagery because hockey is not a cultural force on the level of football. But she says national American Indian organizations have called for an end to all Indian-related mascots and that she found the hockey team's name and Indian head symbol to be offensive. "It lacks dignity," she said. "There's dignity in a school being named after a person or a people. There's dignity in a health clinic or hospital. There's nothing dignified in something being so named (that is used for) recreation or entertainment or fun." The National Congress of American Indians also opposes the Blackhawks' logo, as it does all Native American mascots.
In 2019, the American Indian Center of Chicago ended all ties to the Chicago Blackhawks Foundation, stating they will no longer affiliate "with organizations that perpetuate stereotypes through the use of "Indian" mascots." The AIC noted in its statement that they "previously held a relationship with the Chicago Blackhawks Foundation with the intention of educating the general public about American Indians and the use of logos and mascots. The AIC, along with members of the community have since decided to end this relationship" and stated that "going forward, AIC will have no professional ties with the Blackhawks, or any other organization that perpetuates harmful stereotypes."
Starting in the 2019 season, the Chief Wahoo logo will not appear on uniforms nor on stadium signs, although it will still be licensed for team merchandise within the Cleveland area. Local groups say they will continue to advocate for a change of the team name, and object to the continued sale outside the stadium of merchandise with the Wahoo image.
Chief Wahoo is part of an exhibit at the Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia maintained by Ferris State University in Michigan. For Dr. David Pilgrim, a sociology professor at Ferris State and an expert in racial imagery, the symbol is a "red Sambo" that hardly differs from the caricatures of blacks popular in the Jim Crow era in which Wahoo was created, when such depictions of minority races were popularly used to inflame prejudice and justify discriminatory laws and behavior. Pilgrim explains how the exaggerated features serve their discriminatory purpose by emphasizing the differences of the depicted race, thereby reinforcing the idea that the caricatured race is inferior.
In part because they do not use any native imagery, the Edmonton Eskimos are rarely mentioned with regard to the controversy. However Natan Obed, the President of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Canada's national Inuit organization, has stated that "Eskimo is not only outdated, it is now largely considered a derogatory term" and is a "relic of colonial power". The editorial board of the Toronto Star sees a name change as the inevitable result of social evolution, and reflecting respect for indigenous peoples. However, after a year of considering alternatives, the team decided in 2020 to retain the name finding no consensus among Native groups including the Inuit.
Kansas City ChiefsEdit
In 1963 the Kansas City Chiefs adopted their name when the Dallas Texans (AFL) relocated. "Chiefs" was not a direct reference to Native Americans, but to Kansas City mayor Harold Roe Bartle who was instrumental in bringing the Texans to Kansas City, Missouri. Bartle earned his nickname as founder of a Boy Scouts honor camping society, Tribe of Mic-O-Say, in which he was "Chief" Lone Bear. Bartle had been known by the nickname as a prominent Kansas City businessman, so it soon became the unavoidable name for the team. In spite of attempts to downplay Native American associations, fan behavior such as the tomahawk chop and wearing face paint and headdresses drew criticism.
The Chiefs drew little attention compared to other teams until 2013, when photographs of fans in "Indian" dress appeared in the Kansas City Star. In 2014 the Star reported that the team's management planned discussions with some Native American groups to find a non-confrontational way to eliminate, or at least reduce, offensive behavior. Achieving greater visibility by reaching the playoffs in 2016, Native Americans at Haskell Indian Nations University in Lawrence, Kansas are asking the Chiefs to stop behavior that invokes stereotypes, such as wearing headdresses and doing the "tomahawk chop". In a statistical analysis of social media comments (tweets) leading up to Super Bowl LIV, researchers found many more negative terms associated with the Kansas City team compared to San Francisco. While both teams were referred to in terms related to violence, the Chiefs were much more likely to receive insults related to intelligence (being called stupid) and many insults were specific references to negative Native American stereotypes, such as drunkenness ("firewater"), and being inbred or extinct. The conclusion drawn was support for Natives being insulted, rather than honored, by Native American mascots.
The Washington Redskins receives the most public attention due to the prominence of the team being located in the nation's capital, and the name itself being defined in current dictionaries of American English as "usually offensive", "disparaging", "insulting", and "taboo". Native American opposition to the name began in the early 1970s with letters to the owner of the team and the editors of The Washington Post. National protests began in 1988, after the team's Super Bowl XXII victory, and again when the 1992 Super Bowl between the Redskins and the Buffalo Bills was held in Minnesota. Those officially censuring and/or demanding the name be changed include more than 80 organizations that represent various groups of Native Americans.
When the Redskins participated in "Blackout Tuesday" on June 2, 2020, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez responded "Want to really stand for racial justice? Change your name." Subsequently, Mayor Muriel Bowser interrelated her position that the name is an impediment to the team's return to a stadium in the District of Columbia. A statue of the team's founder, George Preston Marshall has been removed from the grounds of RFK Stadium after being spray painted with the words "Change the Name". The management of the stadium stated that the statue would not return, and that its removal was long overdue. In the following week, the team removed all mention of Marshall from the team's other facilities and website.
In July 2020, amidst the removal of many names and images as part of the George Floyd protests, a group of investors worth $620 billion wrote letters to major sponsors Nike, FedEx and PepsiCo encouraging pressure on the Redskins to change their name. FedEx called on the team to change its name on July 2, 2020. The same day, Nike removed Redskins apparel from its website. On July 3, the league and the franchise announced that it was "undergoing a thorough review of the team name." On July 7, it was acknowledged that the Redskins were not in contact with a group of Native Americans who petitioned the NFL to force a name change and that Redskins head coach Ron Rivera also stated the team wanted to continue “honoring and supporting Native Americans and our Military.”
Stereotyping by rival fansEdit
In addition to the behavior of the teams that have Native American names or mascots, their rivals often invoke racist stereotypes. In December 2013 when the Washington Redskins played the Kansas City Chiefs an employee of a Sonic Drive-In in Missouri placed a message outside that used scalping, reservations and whiskey to disparage the "Redskins". It was quickly removed with the owner's apologies. A rubber severed "Indian" head impaled on a knife has been used by a sports fan in Philadelphia to taunt rival teams with Native American mascots. There have been a number of incidents of rival high school teams displaying banners or signs referencing the Trail of Tears, which have been criticized for both insensitivity and ignorance of history. Although the Central Michigan Chippewas have the support of the Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Nation of Michigan, a student at rival Western Michigan University designed a T-shirt showing a Native American behind bars with the legend "Caught a Chippewa about a week ago". It was quickly condemned by both university presidents, who agreed that anyone wearing the shirt at a game would be ejected. In spite of the University of North Dakota changing their nickname from the Fighting Sioux to the Fighting Hawks, students at rival North Dakota State University (NDSU) continue to chant "Sioux suck shit" whenever their football team makes a first down. The NDSU president, along with the presidents of the student body and faculty senates, have called for an end to the practice, which they describe as hateful, and coming from a misplaced sense of tradition. Some NDSU fans also wear T-shirts with graphics depicting variations on the "Sioux suck" theme.
Varying degrees of offensivenessEdit
To further complicate this controversy, many feel that there are varying levels of offensiveness with team names and mascots. The nature and degree of stereotyping varies depending upon the name of the team, the logo, the mascot, and the behavior of fans. The greatest offense is taken when the logo and mascot are caricatures viewed as insulting, such as the Cleveland Indians' Chief Wahoo; the name of the team is often regarded as a racial slur, such as Redskins or Squaws; or the behavior of the mascot or fans is based upon popular images of Indians which trivialize authentic native cultures, such as the tomahawk chop.
The practices of individual schools and teams have changed in response to the controversy. A local example is Washington High School in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Many Native American images have been removed, and the "Warriors" nickname is now claimed to be generic. The school now has a "circle of courage" logo with eagle feathers and has also "updated" the murals of Chief Hollow Horn Bear in the gym. Duane Hollow Horn Bear, the chief's great-grandson, who teaches Lakota language and history at Sinte Gleska University in Mission, stated: "We had no objection to their utilizing those pictures as long as my great-grandfather was represented with honor and dignity." However, not all Native Americans are happy with the presence of any such images.
Teams outside the AmericasEdit
Native American names and images are used by teams in other countries, generally those playing American-style sports and copying the imagery of American teams. Several are in countries that also have a tradition of Native American hobbyists often associated with the popularity of the stories written by German author Karl May.
- C. Richard King (2010). "Introduction". In C. Richard King (ed.). The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6731-4.
- Stephanie A. Fryberg (September 2008). "Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots" (PDF). Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 30 (3): 208. doi:10.1080/01973530802375003.
- "Legislative efforts to eliminate native-themed mascots, nicknames, and logos: Slow but steady progress post-APA resolution". American Psychological Association. August 2010. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media". National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media. Retrieved October 3, 2014.
- Davis, Laurel R. "The problems with Native American mascots". Multicultural Education. 9 (4): 11–14. ISSN 1068-3844. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
- S.P. Morris (2015). "The Trouble with Mascots". Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 42 (2): 287–297. doi:10.1080/00948705.2014.997740.
- Barbara E. Munson (2010). "2. Teaching Them Respect Not Racism: Common Themes and Questions About the Use of "Indian" Logos". In C. Richard King (ed.). The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6731-4.
- Deloria, Philip J. (1998). Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Playing Indian. Yale University Press. Archived from the original on June 30, 2016. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
- Cecily Hilleary (August 5, 2019). "Native Americans to Boy Scouts: Stop Plundering Our Past". =Voice of America. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
- Spindel, Carol (2002). Dancing at Halftime: Sports and the Controversy Over American Indian Mascots. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 9780814781272.
- "The Boston Redskins". Sports Ecyclopedia. Retrieved April 24, 2013.
- "Baseball writers select "Indians" as the best name to apply to the former Naps". The Plain Dealer. Cleveland, Ohio. January 17, 1915.
With the going of Nap Lajoie to the Athletics, a new name had to be selected for the Cleveland American league club. President Somers invited the Cleveland baseball writers to make the selection. The title of Indians was their choice, it having been one of the names applied to the old National league club of Cleveland many years ago.
- "Looking Backwards". The Plain Dealer. Cleveland, Ohio. January 18, 1915.
- Staurowsky, Ellen (December 1998). "An Act of Honor or Exploitation? The Cleveland Indians' Use of the Louis Francis Sockalexis Story". Sociology of Sports Journal. 15 (4): 299. doi:10.1123/ssj.15.4.299.
- Posnanski, Joe (March 18, 2014). "The Cleveland Indians, Louis Sockalexis, and The Name". =NBC Sports.
- "APA Resolution Justifications" (PDF). American Psychological Association. 2005. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
- Carter Meland and David E. Wilkins (November 22, 2012). "Stereotypes in sports, chaos in federal policy". The Star Tribune. Retrieved January 30, 2013.
- Banks, D. J. (1993). "Tribal Names and Mascots in Sports". Journal of Sport & Social Issues. 17 (1): 5–8. doi:10.1177/019372359301700102.
- Hylton, J Gordon (January 1, 2010). "BEFORE THE REDSKINS WERE THE REDSKINS: THE USE OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN THE FORMATIVE ERA OF AMERICAN SPORTS, 1857–1933" (PDF). North Dakota Law Review. 86: 879.
- "Ending the Legacy of Racism in Sports & the Era of Harmful Indian Sports Mascots". NCAI. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
- "Policy Paper" (PDF). NCAI.
- Martin, Douglas (October 17, 2007). "Vernon Bellecourt, Who Protested the Use of Indian Mascots, Dies at 75". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
- "Russell Means: A Look at His Journey Through Life" (Text). Indian Country Today Media Network.com. October 22, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
- "About - National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media". National Coalition Against Racism in Sports and Media.
- Pewewardy, Cornel (1999). "From enemy to mascot: The deculturation of Indian mascots in sports culture". Canadian Journal of Native Education. 23 (2): 176–189. ISSN 0710-1481. ProQuest 230304174.
- Longwell-Grice, Robert; Longwell-Grice, Hope (2003). "Chiefs, Braves, and Tomahawks: The Use of American Indians as University Mascots". NASPA Journal (National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc.). 40 (3): 1–12. doi:10.2202/0027-6014.1255. ISSN 0027-6014.
- Riley, Angela (2005). "Straight Stealing: Towards an Indigenous System of Cultural Property Protection". Washington Law Review. 80 (69). SSRN 703283.
- Dedrick Asante-Muhammad (March 1, 2017). "Beyond Standing Rock: The Native American Economic Experience". The Huffington Post.
The U.S. has gained far too much from the marginalization of Native Americans
- Dave Zirin (December 19, 2017). "The Washington Redhawks Culture Jam: Jacqueline Keeler joins the show to talk native mascotry" (Podcast). The Nation. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
- "Native-American Nicknames/Mascots". Red Orbit. June 2, 2005.
- "Anti-Defamation and Mascots". National Congress of American Indians. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
- "Indian Mascot Position Statement" (PDF). Society of Indian Psychologists. January 27, 1999. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 31, 2015. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- Derald Wing Sue (2010). Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact. John Wiley & Sons. p. 384. ISBN 9780470627204.
- "Summary of the Resolution Recommending Retirement of American Indian Mascots". American Psychological Association. 2005.
- "NASSS Native American Imagery Resolution". North American Society for the Sociology of Sport. October 28, 2005. Retrieved February 5, 2017.
- "Statement by the Council of the American Sociological Association on Discontinuing the Use of Native American Nicknames, Logos and Mascots in Sport". American Sociological Association. March 6, 2007. Archived from the original on February 21, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "Opposition to Use of Stereotypical Native American Images as Sports Symbols and Mascots" (PDF). American Counseling Association. 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 15, 2013. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "AAA Calls on Sports Organizations to Denounce Inappropriate American Indian Mascots" (PDF) (Press release). March 25, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 4, 2016.
- Trujillo, Octaviana (Ph.D.); Alston, Denise (Ph.D.) (2005), A Report on the Status of American Indians and Alaska Natives in Education, National Education Association
- Richard E. Besser (May 7, 2018). "Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: We honored sports teams with racist mascots. Not anymore". USA Today. Retrieved May 9, 2018.
- Fryberg, Stephanie A. (September 2008). "Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots". Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 30 (3): 208. doi:10.1080/01973530802375003.
- MURPHY PAUL, ANNIE (October 6, 2012). "It's Not Me, It's You". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2013.
- Chaney, John (January 1, 2011). "Do American Indian Mascots = American Indian People? Examining Implicit Bias towards American Indian People and American Indian Mascots". American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research. 18 (1): 42–62. doi:10.5820/aian.1801.2011.42. PMID 21866499.
- Kim-Prieto, Chu (March 2010). "Effect of Exposure to an American Indian Mascot on the Tendency to Stereotype a Different Minority Group". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40 (3): 534. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00586.x.
- Vedantam, Shankar (March 25, 2010). "Native American imagery as sports mascots: A new problem". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on April 19, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
- Doug Harlow (April 5, 2017). "KKK flyers in Skowhegan prompt school letters, renewed angst over 'Indians' mascot". Portland Press Herald. Archived from the original on April 6, 2017.
- "NAACP 1999 Resolution". American Indian Sports Team Mascots. Archived from the original on November 28, 2012. Retrieved January 29, 2013.
- "Statement of the United States Commission on Civil Rights on the use of Native American images and nicknames as sports symbols" (Press release). 2001. Retrieved December 10, 2016.
- "USA: 'Redskins' Team mascot hurtful reminder of past suffering of Native Americans – UN rights expert". United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Archived from the original on April 13, 2014.
- Puxley, Chinta (November 15, 2015). "Stop using offensive indigenous mascots in sports, Justice Murray Sinclair says". The Toronto Star.
- Berger, Bethany R. (2009). "Red: Racism and the American Indian" (PDF). UCLA Law Review. 56: 591. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 23, 2015.
- "Michigan Department of Civil Rights: Continued Use of American Indian Mascots Hurts Student Achievement". State of Michigan. Archived from the original on February 18, 2013. Retrieved February 23, 2013.
- Higgins, Lori (June 3, 2013). "Feds toss Michigan complaint to ban Indian mascots for sports teams". The Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on June 5, 2013. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- "Resolution Adopted by the CCAR: Racism". Central Conference of American Rabbis. 1992. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
- "Resolution to Establish Formal Relationships with the National Coalition on Racism in Sports and Media". Unitarian Universalist Association. Retrieved March 15, 2017.
- "Black caucus joins Native American mascot fight". United Methodist Church. April 4, 2007. Archived from the original on February 4, 2014. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- Rev. Chebon Kernell (April 5, 2011). "Native American mascots must go: Time to remove them is long passed". United Methodist Church. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
- "Mascot issue raises specters of racism, idolatry". Worldwide Faith News. March 9, 2001. Archived from the original on January 18, 2017. Retrieved October 19, 2013.
- "Letter to Goodell and Snyder". The Washington Post.
- Vargas, Theresa (December 5, 2013). "Faith leaders urge Redskins owner Dan Snyder and NFL to change team's name". The Washington Post.
- "Quaker Indian Affairs Call for Redskins to Change Name". Indian Country Today. July 29, 2014. Archived from the original on August 1, 2014.
- Moriah Balingit; John Woodrow Cox (February 13, 2015). "Md. private school bans use of the 'R-word' on campus to promote equality". The Washington Post.
- Morello, Carol (March 1, 2014). "Churches propose a boycott of Redskins unless the team changes its name". The Washington Post.
- "UCC Central Atlantic Conference Passes Resolution Calling for Washington NFL Team Name Change & Calls for Member Boycott". Native News Online. June 15, 2014.
- Brady, Erik (June 14, 2014). "Church group latest to boycott Redskins over name". USA Today.
- Taylor, Scott (June 29, 2015). "Cleveland church calls on Washington Redskins to change name, logo". 19 Action News. Archived from the original on July 26, 2015. Retrieved July 1, 2015.
- "OVERSIGHT HEARING on Stolen Identities: The Impact of Racist Stereotypes on Indigenous People". United States Senate. May 5, 2011. Archived from the original on December 12, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- "Native American Mascot Controversy Takes Center Stage at the National Museum of the American Indian". Smithsonian Institution. December 24, 2012. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- Fabian, Jordan (November 5, 2015). "Obama: Teams should drop Native American mascots". The Hill.
- Beth Jacobson (2003). "The Social Psychology of the Creation of a Sports Fan Identity: A Theoretical Review of the Literature". Athletic Insight - The Online Journal of Sports Psychology. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
- "Letter from Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder to fans". The Washington Post. October 9, 2013. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
- Eric Simons (January 30, 2015). "The psychology of why sports fans see their teams as extensions of themselves". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
- Emert, Phyllis Raybin (2003). "Native American Mascots: Racial Slur or Cherished Tradition?" (PDF). Respect (Newsletter). New Jersey State Bar Foundation. 2 (2 (Winter 2003)). Archived from the original (PDF) on January 3, 2011.
- "Mascots are a matter of respect". ESPN. Retrieved February 6, 2013.
- Farnell, Brenda (2010). "Choreographing Colonialism in the American West" (PDF). Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement. 14 (3).
In 1915, the Order of the Arrow, a national Scout camping fraternity, was founded in which ceremonies of initiation were based on 'Indian themes' and local lodges and chapters were given 'Indian names.' The first three individuals who portrayed Illiniwek (Lester Leutwiler, Webber Borchers, and William Newton) became interested in 'Indian lore' through their involvement with the Boy Scouts. They spent time “Playing Indian” (Deloria 1998) at summer camp, learning so-called Indian dances as well as arts and crafts from Ralph Hubbard, a renowned enthusiast who traveled widely in the United States and Europe producing 'Indian pageants'.
- Christine Des Garennes (May 7, 2013). "Peoria tribe leader doesn't back Chief return". News-Gazette. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
- W. James Antle III (November 13, 2013). "Redskins: A Manufactured Controversy". The National Interest.
- Rich Lowry (October 8, 2013). "Liberals Fabricate Outrage Over 'Redskins': The team name is an anachronism, but a harmless one". National Review.
- Dennis Prager (August 13, 2013). "The Left vs. the Redskins: Teaching people to take offense is one of the Left's black arts". National Review.
- "California high school's Arab mascot draws ire". USA Today. November 7, 2013. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- Kelman, Brett (September 10, 2014). "'Mighty Arab' takes its place at Coachella Valley High". The Desert Sun.
- Jason S. Parini (March 6, 2013). "Should the Notre Dame Fighting Irish Leprechaun Logo Be Banned by the NCAA?". The Bleacher Report. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
- Cassidy McDonald (October 9, 2014). "Is "Fighting Irish" Offensive?". University of Notre Dame Scholastic. Retrieved June 9, 2017.
- Notre Dame Fighting Irish - Traditions: The Leprechaun Archived December 1, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, University of Notre Dame Athletics
- Fearon, James (2003). "Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country" (PDF). Journal of Economic Growth. 8 (2): 195–222. doi:10.1023/A:1024419522867.
Ireland has an ethnic fractionalization score of 0.171, meaning that there is only a 17.1% chance that two randomly selected people in Ireland will be from different ethnic groups.
- Gwen Sharp, PhD (October 5, 2008). "Sociological Images". The Society Pages.
- "NCAA: UNCP will keep the Braves". University of North Carolina at Pembroke. August 9, 2005. Archived from the original on December 22, 2005. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- "Member institutions". Midlands Collegiate Athletic Conference. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015. Retrieved March 18, 2015.
- "About Us/History". Pembroke Middle School. Retrieved March 18, 2015.
- "Overview". Pembroke Middle School. Retrieved March 18, 2015.
- Specht, Sanne (May 18, 2012). "State bans Native American mascots". Mail Tribune. Retrieved February 11, 2013.
- "The Financial Impact of Mascots on Sports Brands". Emory University. December 19, 2013. Archived from the original on October 20, 2014. Retrieved April 20, 2014.
- Henry DeVries. "Why Maine Banning Indian Mascots Is A Marketing Wake Up Call". Forbes. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
- S.L. Price (March 4, 2002). "The Indian Wars". Sports Illustrated. pp. 66–71.
- C. Richard King; Ellen J. Staurowsky; Lawrence Baca; Laurel R. Davis; Cornel Pewewardy (November 2002). "Of Polls and Race Predudice". Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 26 (4): 381. doi:10.1177/0193732502238255.
- King, C. Richard. The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook p.268. (ISBN 978-0-8108-6732-1). Peter Harris Research Group. (2002) Methodology for Sports Illustrated survey on the use of Indian nicknames, mascots, etc. Document produced by The Peter Harris Research Group and shared with Ellen Staurowsky in January 2003.
- "Some collected materials about the NCAA's decision to ban Indian sports mascots from the Indianapolis area". Indiana University. Retrieved January 27, 2013.
- Charles Springwood (February 2004). "'I'm Indian Too!': Claiming Native American Identity, Crafting Authority in Mascot Debates". Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 28 (1): 56. doi:10.1177/0193732503261477.
- "New Study Finds 67% Of Native Americans Find Redskins Name Offensive". Buzzfeed. June 4, 2014.
- "Survey on Redskins team name found most American Indians believe it to be offensive and racist" (PDF) (Press release). Retrieved June 22, 2014.
- Yasmin Anwar (February 4, 2020). "Washington Redskins' name, Native mascots offend more than previously reported". Berkeley News.
- Fryberg, Stephanie A.; Eason, Arianne E.; Brady, Laura M.; Jessop, Nadia; Lopez, Julisa J. (2020). "Unpacking the Mascot Debate: Native American Identification Predicts Opposition to Native Mascots". Social Psychological and Personality Science: 194855061989855. doi:10.1177/1948550619898556.
- "Native Mascots Become a National Controversy". Miami University of Ohio. Retrieved December 19, 2016.
- C. Richard King, ed. (2010). "Introduction". The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-8108-6731-4.
- Schilling, Vincent (July 28, 2016). "Social Media Blasts Lake Erie Warriors Over Racist Logo". Indian Country Today.
- Lukas, Paul (July 30, 2016). "Lake Erie Warriors Renamed Lake Erie Eagles (probably)". Uni-Watch.
- "Rulebook Update". Little League International. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- "NCAI Applauds Decision by Little League International to Ban Racially Offensive Team Names and Mascots". Alaska Native News. January 11, 2019.
- Paul Ohanian (February 7, 2019). "US Lacrosse Position Statement on Native American Mascots". US Lacrosse. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
- "AB-30 School or athletic team names: California Racial Mascots Act". California Legislative Information. Retrieved September 9, 2015.
- Vic Vela (May 1, 2015). "American Indian mascot bill dies in committee". Colorado Politics.
- "State Board of Education Bans Use of Native American Mascots". Oregon State Department of Education. Retrieved February 10, 2013.
- "USE OF AMERICAN INDIAN MASCOTS, NICKNAMES, AND LOGOS" (PDF). Michigan Board of Education. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
- "2012 Native American Mascot Resolution" (PDF). Washington State Board of Education. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2014. Retrieved September 17, 2013.
- Hayes, Hank (May 10, 2007). "Tennessee Senate approves measure that would protect Indian mascots". Times-News. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016.
- "Opponents urge Walker to veto mascots bill". Wisconsin Law Journal. Associated Press. November 17, 2013.
- RICHMOND, TODD (February 13, 2014). "Menominee leader criticizes Wis. school mascot law". CDC Gaming Reports. Associated Press.
- Hague, Bob (March 5, 2015). "Sokaogon chair: changes to mascot law 'a mockery of indigenous people'". Wisconsin Radio Network.
- Munguia, Hayley. "The 2,128 Native American Mascots People Aren't Talking About". fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
- "Staff at Saskatchewan university calls for end of First Nations logos, mascots". CTV News. November 16, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- Rushowy, Kristin (February 24, 2016). "School boards onside with move to ban 'racist logos'". The Toronto Star.
- MacNeil, Jason (September 4, 2013). "Nepean Redskins Human Rights Complaint: A Tribe Called Red Member Takes Football To Tribunal". HuffPost Canada Music.
- "Nepean Redskins says changing its 'controversial' name to cost about $100Gs". Sun News. January 14, 2014. Archived from the original on February 13, 2015.
- Sinclair, Niigaan (January 4, 2014). "No 'honour' in native names". Winnipeg Free Press.
- Huffman, Alexa (January 10, 2017). "Swift Current baseball team changes name from "Indians" to "57's"". Global News. Archived from the original on March 1, 2017. Retrieved February 28, 2017.
- Antonia Noori Farzan (January 10, 2020). "Getting rid of 'Redmen' sparked an uproar. So school officials voted to reinstate the 'demeaning' team name". The Washington Post.
- By Aaron Randle (January 11, 2020). "Officials Called 'Redmen' a Racist Mascot. Then Voters Weighed In". The New York Times.
- John Penney. "Native American tribe reiterates opposition to Killingly Redmen symbol; mascot will be changed". Norwich Bulletin. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
- Stephen Beale (October 8, 2019). "Mascot pick sent to BOE". The Bulletin.
- Shawnte Passmore; Courtney Zieller; Caitlin Nuclo; Rob Polansky (December 10, 2019). "Killingly High School is mascot-less following meeting". WFSB.
- Anna Maria Della Costa (June 11, 2019). "Redmen mascot racist? Community weighs in". Norwich Bulletin.
- Eliza Fawcett (December 1, 2019). "In Killingly, a debate over the high school mascot leads to a political reckoning". Hartford Courant.
- Doug Harlow (March 7, 2019). "Skowhegan schools become last in Maine to retire 'Indians' nickname". Portland Press Herald.
- The Associated Press (March 8, 2019). "Last Maine high school to use 'Indians' retires the nickname". The Boston Herald.
- "State of Maine Legislature - Summary of LD 944". State of Maine Legislature. Retrieved May 2, 2019.
- Alex Acquisto (May 16, 2019). "Mills signs bill to make Maine the first state to ban Native American school mascots". Bangor Daily News.
- Reilly, Rick (September 18, 2013). "Have the people spoken?". ESPN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2013. Retrieved October 15, 2013.
- Peirano, Michelle (May 1, 2013). "In debate over Redskins name, is the 'R-word' for racism or respect?". Cronkite News. Retrieved February 6, 2014.
- Dave Urbanski (May 14, 2018). "Indian mascot at HS gets blessing from tribe — and without cultural controversy: 'I'm honored'". KCNC-TV.
- Taylor, Michael (2011). "THE SALAMANCA WARRIORS: A Case Study of an 'Exception to the Rule.'". Journal of Anthropological Research. 67 (2): 245–265. doi:10.3998/jar.0521004.0067.205. JSTOR 41303285.
- "Color: Stanford Identity Toolkit". Stanford University. Retrieved October 7, 2017.
- "Mascot Story". Miami University. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
- Rao, Manasa (October 10, 2016). "Football programs criticized for racist imagery". Yale Daily News.
- Wieberg, Steve (August 23, 2005). "NCAA allowing Florida State to use its Seminole mascot". USA Today. Retrieved November 21, 2011.
- Schwarb, Amy. "Where Pride Meets Prejudice". National Collegiate Athletic Association. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- Schrotenboer, Brent (August 6, 2005). "NCAA puts limited ban on Indian mascots: Postseason policy doesn't hit Aztecs". San Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on October 25, 2016. Retrieved October 24, 2016.
- Allyson Myers (February 27, 2017). "Native American Student Alliance proposes removal of Aztec mascot". The Daily Aztec.
- "NASA 2016-2017 Mascot Statement". Native American Student Alliance. Retrieved February 28, 2017.
- Kirk Kenney (January 19, 2018). "SDSU president assembling task force to review Aztec mascot, moniker". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved January 20, 2018.
- Peyton Antil (October 23, 2019). "SDSU should celebrate Aztec culture". The Daily Aztec.
- "Tri-Cities Blackhawks (1946–1951)". Sports Ecyclopedia. Archived from the original on January 20, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- "Going Retro: Golden State Warriors". NBA. Retrieved February 12, 2013.
- "Hawks swoop in for new USA National Team Name". USA Rugby League. Archived from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
- Anderson, L. V. (September 26, 2012). "Where Did the Tomahawk Chop Come From?". Slate Magazine. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
- "The history of the tomahawk chop". Major League Baseball. Retrieved October 21, 2014.
- Jordan Campbell (January 19, 2017). "Homer is a Fraud: A Look at Braves Alternative Mascot Ideas". Last Word on Baseball. Retrieved January 27, 2018.
- Mike Axisa (January 27, 2018). "Braves' new mascot 'Blooper' bears a striking resemblance to Phillie Phanatic". CBS Sports. Retrieved January 27, 2018.
- Jake Russell; Jacob Bogage (October 5, 2019). "Cardinals pitcher calls Braves' tomahawk chop 'disappointing' and 'disrespectful'". The Washington Post.
- Des Bieler (October 9, 2019). "Braves shelve foam tomahawks 'out of respect' for Cardinals pitcher". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 10, 2013.
- Levi Rickert (October 10, 2019). "SF Bay Area FOX Station on Atlanta Loss: "Braves Scalped"". Native News Online.
- Natalie O'Neill (October 10, 2019). "News station apologizes for 'racially insensitive' Braves headline after loss to Cardinals". The New York Post.
- Johnny Edwards (October 13, 2019). "Braves team to talk with Native Americans about future of ritual". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
- Keilman, John (June 19, 2013). "Protests rare over Blackhawks' name, logo: While critics say use of Indian mascots perpetuates outdated image, hockey club says it has mutually beneficial ties with local community". Chicago Tribune.
- Jake Russell (July 3, 2020). "Cleveland Indians announce plans to consider name change". The Washington Post.
- Mandy Bell (July 3, 2020). "Indians weigh 'best path forward' for team name". MLB.com/Indians.
- Waldstein, David (2018). "Cleveland Indians Will Abandon Chief Wahoo Logo Next Year". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 29, 2018.
- Nick Pedone (July 9, 2019). "As the All-Star Game Goes on Without Chief Wahoo, Local Groups Say They'll Continue Pushing for Indians to Change Name". The Cleveland Scene. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
- Pattakos, Peter (April 25, 2012). "The Curse of Chief Wahoo: Are we paying the price for embracing America's last acceptable racist symbol?". The Cleveland Scene. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
- Kwong, Matt (June 20, 2014). "Washington Redskins fight could put pressure on Edmonton Inuit". CBC.
- Obed, Natan (November 27, 2015). "Attention Edmonton Eskimos: Inuit are not mascots". The Globe and Mail.
- Star Editorial Board (November 26, 2017). "Edmonton's Eskimos should get with the times and change their name". Toronto Star. Retrieved November 27, 2017.
- "Eskimos decide to keep name in wake of calls to change it". Edmonton Sun. February 14, 2020.
- Vincent Schilling (September 19, 2019). "How the Kansas City Chiefs got their name and the Boy Scout Tribe of Mic-O-Say". Indian Country Today.
- Dave Caldwell (February 1, 2020). "The True Tale Of The Original Kansas City Chief". Forbes.
- "Warpaint". Kansas City Chiefs. Kansas City Chiefs. Archived from the original on December 14, 2014. Retrieved November 13, 2014.
- Donovan, Derek (October 27, 2013). "Chiefs fans' 'Indian' dress is problematic". The Kansas City Star.
- Mellinger, Sam (August 6, 2014). "To avoid a cultural free-for-all, Chiefs form alliance with American Indian groups". The Kansas City Star.
- Rothfield, Ariel (January 15, 2016). "Kansas indigenous group asking Kansas City Chiefs fans to stop the Tomahawk chop". KSHB Kansas City. Archived from the original on December 28, 2016. Retrieved January 16, 2016.
- "Not Your Mascot: Opinions vs Data". Indigenous Engineering. Retrieved February 18, 2020.
- "Definition of REDSKIN". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
Definition of REDSKIN (usually offensive): american indian
- The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. 2011. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
n. Offensive Slang Used as a disparaging term for a Native American.
- "Redskin". Dictionary.com. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
noun, Slang: Often Disparaging and Offensive. 1. a North American Indian.
- "definition of redskin". RANDOM HOUSE KERNERMAN WEBSTER'S College Dictionary. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
- "Definition of redskin". Collins English Dictionary.
- Hiatt, Fred (September 21, 2014). "Moving beyond the 'imaginary Indians' perception". The Washington Post.
- Steinberg, Dan (June 3, 2014). "The Great Redskins Name Debate of ... 1972?". The Washington Post.
- "2,000 at Metrodome protest Indian mascots". The New York Times. January 27, 1992.
- "Supporters of Change". Change the Mascot. Retrieved November 13, 2014.
- Scott McDonald (June 2, 2020). "AOC Slams Washington Redskins, Says 'Change Your Name' if Team Wants to 'Really Stand For Racial Justice'". Newsweek.
- "D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser: Redskins need to change team name". NBC Sports Washington. June 12, 2020.
- Rachel Scully (June 19, 2020). "'Change the name' spray-painted on monument to Redskins football team founder". The Hill.
- Ken Belson (June 24, 2020). "Redskins Cling to Team's Name but Erase Former Owner's". The New York Times.
- McDonald, Scott (July 1, 2020). "Washington Redskins Urged to Lose Name, or Millions in Sponsorships". Newsweek. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- "First Peoples Worldwide Leads Investors' Call for NFL Washington Team Name Change". Colorado.edu (Press release). June 30, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- "FedEx requests Washington Redskins to change team name". NFL.com. NFL Enterprises. July 2, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- Clarke, Liz (July 2, 2020). "FedEx calls on Redskins to change name following investors' demands on sponsors". Washington Post.
- "Nike pulls Washington Redskins apparel from its website amid team name controversy". WITI (TV). July 3, 2020.
- Grimes, Prince J. (July 2, 2020). "Nike removes Redskins name, apparel from its website". NBCSports.com. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- "Washington Redskins to undergo thorough review of team's name". NFL.com. NFL Enterprises. July 3, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- Lantry, Lauren (July 3, 2020). "Washington Redskins, under pressure from corporate sponsors, reviewing name". ABCNews.go.com. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
- Roman Stubbs (July 7, 2020). "As Redskins conduct name review, Native American groups say they haven't heard from team". The Washington Post.
- Benjamin Freed (December 9, 2013). "Sonic Drive-In Apologizes for Incredibly Racist "Redskins" Sign: A roadside sign even more awful than the team's on-field performance". Washingtonian. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
- Adrienne J. Keene. "Thanks for the severed head. You proved my point". Native Appropriations. Retrieved December 8, 2016.
- Bleier, Evan (November 19, 2013). "McAdory High School in Alabama apologizes for 'Trail of Tears' sign". UPI.
- Murphy, Tim (November 21, 2013). "Here's Another High School Football Team Promoting the "Trail of Tears"". Mother Jones.
- Horne, Erik (August 30, 2014). "OSU football: 'Trail of Tears' College GameDay sign condemned by university". News OK.
- Burk, Timothy (October 29, 2016). "Cheerleaders Display "Trail Of Tears" Banner Before Game Against Team With Indian Mascot". Deadspin.
- "WMU, CMU presidents offer swift action following t-shirt controversy". WWMT-TV. November 22, 2014.
- Patrick Springer (October 17, 2016). "NDSU president calls for end of 'hateful' Sioux chant at Bison football games". Grand Forks Herald.
- Konnie LeMay (November 19, 2016). "Offensive T-Shirt Shows NDSU Fans Can't Let Go: 'Sioux Suck' Chant Lives On". Indian Country Today Network.
- "Coalition Of Religious Investors Fight Baseball Team Logo". Catholic Culture. July 10, 1997. Retrieved January 18, 2013.
- "Squaws are region runner-ups:host first round of state Friday". The Dodge County News Online. February 15, 2017. Retrieved March 6, 2017.
- Bates, Mike (May 1, 2013). "Yeah, the "Tomahawk Chop" bugs me. Here's why". SB Nation.
- Whitney, Stu (January 17, 2015). "Does Washington High have nickname problem?". Argus Leader.
- Andrew Keh (May 7, 2018). "Tomahawk Chops and Indian Mascots: In Europe, Teams Don't See a Problem". The New York Times.
- Guiliano, Jennifer (2015). Indian Spectacle: Mascots and the Anxiety of Modern America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- King, C. Richard, guest editor. "Re/claiming Indianness: Critical Perspectives on Native American Mascots." Journal of Sport and Social Issues 28, no. 1 (February 2004). www.sagepub.com/ejournals
- King, C. Richard, and Charles Fruehling Springwood (2001). Beyond the Cheers: Race as Spectacle in College Sport. SUNY Series on Sport, Culture, and Social Relations. State University of New York Press.
- King, C. Richard, and Charles Fruehling Springwood, eds. (2001). Team Spirits: The Native American Mascots Controversy. Foreword by Vine Deloria Jr. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Remillard, Arthur. "Holy War on the Football Field: Religion and the Florida State University Mascot Controversy." Horsehide, Pigskin, Oval Tracks, and Apple Pie: Essays on Sports and American Culture. Edited by James Vlasich. McFarland, 2005.
- Jeffrey Ian Ross Ph, D. (October 28, 2013). American Indians at Risk [2 volumes]. ISBN 9780313397653.
- Change the Mascot - Focuses on the Washington NFL team
- Native American-related mascots
- Native Appropriations by Adrienne Keene