# Holographic principle

This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

The **holographic principle** is a tenet of string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region—such as a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard 't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind^{[1]} who combined his ideas with previous ones of 't Hooft and Charles Thorn.^{[1]}^{[2]} As pointed out by Raphael Bousso,^{[3]} Thorn observed in 1978 that string theory admits a lower-dimensional description in which gravity emerges from it in what would now be called a holographic way. The prime example of holography is the AdS/CFT correspondence.

The holographic principle was inspired by black hole thermodynamics, which conjectures that the maximal entropy in any region scales with the radius *squared*, and not cubed as might be expected. In the case of a black hole, the insight was that the informational content of all the objects that have fallen into the hole might be entirely contained in surface fluctuations of the event horizon. The holographic principle resolves the black hole information paradox within the framework of string theory.^{[4]}
However, there exist classical solutions to the Einstein equations that allow values of the entropy larger than those allowed by an area law, hence in principle larger than those of a black hole. These are the so-called "Wheeler's bags of gold". The existence of such solutions conflicts with the holographic interpretation, and their effects in a quantum theory of gravity including the holographic principle are not fully understood yet.^{[5]}

## The AdS/CFT correspondenceEdit

The **anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence**, sometimes called **Maldacena duality** or **gauge/gravity duality**, is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) which are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) which are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles.

The duality represents a major advance in our understanding of string theory and quantum gravity.^{[6]} This is because it provides a non-perturbative formulation of string theory with certain boundary conditions and because it is the most successful realization of the holographic principle.

It also provides a powerful toolkit for studying strongly coupled quantum field theories.^{[7]} Much of the usefulness of the duality results from the fact that it is a strong-weak duality: when the fields of the quantum field theory are strongly interacting, the ones in the gravitational theory are weakly interacting and thus more mathematically tractable. This fact has been used to study many aspects of nuclear and condensed matter physics by translating problems in those subjects into more mathematically tractable problems in string theory.

The AdS/CFT correspondence was first proposed by Juan Maldacena in late 1997. Important aspects of the correspondence were elaborated in articles by Steven Gubser, Igor Klebanov, and Alexander Markovich Polyakov, and by Edward Witten. By 2015, Maldacena's article had over 10,000 citations, becoming the most highly cited article in the field of high energy physics.^{[8]}

## Black hole entropyEdit

An object with relatively high entropy is microscopically random, like a hot gas. A known configuration of classical fields has zero entropy: there is nothing random about electric and magnetic fields, or gravitational waves. Since black holes are exact solutions of Einstein's equations, they were thought not to have any entropy either.

But Jacob Bekenstein noted that this leads to a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. If one throws a hot gas with entropy into a black hole, once it crosses the event horizon, the entropy would disappear. The random properties of the gas would no longer be seen once the black hole had absorbed the gas and settled down. One way of salvaging the second law is if black holes are in fact random objects with an entropy that increases by an amount greater than the entropy of the consumed gas.

Bekenstein assumed that black holes are maximum entropy objects—that they have more entropy than anything else in the same volume. In a sphere of radius *R*, the entropy in a relativistic gas increases as the energy increases. The only known limit is gravitational; when there is too much energy the gas collapses into a black hole. Bekenstein used this to put an upper bound on the entropy in a region of space, and the bound was proportional to the area of the region. He concluded that the black hole entropy is directly proportional to the area of the event horizon.^{[9]} Gravitational time dilation causes time, from the perspective of a remote observer, to stop at the event horizon. Due to the natural limit on maximum speed of motion, this prevents falling objects from crossing the event horizon no matter how close they get to it. Since any change in quantum state requires time to flow, so all objects and their quantum information state stays imprinted on the event horizon. Bekenstein concluded that from the perspective of any remote observer, the black hole entropy is directly proportional to the area of the event horizon.

Stephen Hawking had shown earlier that the total horizon area of a collection of black holes always increases with time. The horizon is a boundary defined by light-like geodesics; it is those light rays that are just barely unable to escape. If neighboring geodesics start moving toward each other they eventually collide, at which point their extension is inside the black hole. So the geodesics are always moving apart, and the number of geodesics which generate the boundary, the area of the horizon, always increases. Hawking's result was called the second law of black hole thermodynamics, by analogy with the law of entropy increase, but at first, he did not take the analogy too seriously.

Hawking knew that if the horizon area were an actual entropy, black holes would have to radiate. When heat is added to a thermal system, the change in entropy is the increase in mass-energy divided by temperature:

(Here the term *δM c ^{2}* is substituted for the thermal energy added to the system, generally by non-integrable random processes, in contrast to d

*S*, which is a function of a few "state variables" only, i.e. in conventional thermodynamics only of the Kelvin temperature

*T*and a few additional state variables as, e.g., the pressure.)

If black holes have a finite entropy, they should also have a finite temperature. In particular, they would come to equilibrium with a thermal gas of photons. This means that black holes would not only absorb photons, but they would also have to emit them in the right amount to maintain detailed balance.

Time-independent solutions to field equations do not emit radiation, because a time-independent background conserves energy. Based on this principle, Hawking set out to show that black holes do not radiate. But, to his surprise, a careful analysis convinced him that they do, and in just the right way to come to equilibrium with a gas at a finite temperature. Hawking's calculation fixed the constant of proportionality at 1/4; the entropy of a black hole is one quarter its horizon area in Planck units.^{[10]}

The entropy is proportional to the logarithm of the number of microstates, the ways a system can be configured microscopically while leaving the macroscopic description unchanged. Black hole entropy is deeply puzzling — it says that the logarithm of the number of states of a black hole is proportional to the area of the horizon, not the volume in the interior.^{[11]}

Later, Raphael Bousso came up with a covariant version of the bound based upon null sheets.^{[12]}

## Black hole information paradoxEdit

Hawking's calculation suggested that the radiation which black holes emit is not related in any way to the matter that they absorb. The outgoing light rays start exactly at the edge of the black hole and spend a long time near the horizon, while the infalling matter only reaches the horizon much later. The infalling and outgoing mass/energy interact only when they cross. It is implausible that the outgoing state would be completely determined by some tiny residual scattering.^{[citation needed]}

Hawking interpreted this to mean that when black holes absorb some photons in a pure state described by a wave function, they re-emit new photons in a thermal mixed state described by a density matrix. This would mean that quantum mechanics would have to be modified because, in quantum mechanics, states which are superpositions with probability amplitudes never become states which are probabilistic mixtures of different possibilities.^{[note 1]}

Troubled by this paradox, Gerard 't Hooft analyzed the emission of Hawking radiation in more detail.^{[13]}^{[self-published source?]} He noted that when Hawking radiation escapes, there is a way in which incoming particles can modify the outgoing particles. Their gravitational field would deform the horizon of the black hole, and the deformed horizon could produce different outgoing particles than the undeformed horizon. When a particle falls into a black hole, it is boosted relative to an outside observer, and its gravitational field assumes a universal form. 't Hooft showed that this field makes a logarithmic tent-pole shaped bump on the horizon of a black hole, and like a shadow, the bump is an alternative description of the particle's location and mass. For a four-dimensional spherical uncharged black hole, the deformation of the horizon is similar to the type of deformation which describes the emission and absorption of particles on a string-theory world sheet. Since the deformations on the surface are the only imprint of the incoming particle, and since these deformations would have to completely determine the outgoing particles, 't Hooft believed that the correct description of the black hole would be by some form of string theory.

This idea was made more precise by Leonard Susskind, who had also been developing holography, largely independently. Susskind argued that the oscillation of the horizon of a black hole is a complete description^{[note 2]} of both the infalling and outgoing matter, because the world-sheet theory of string theory was just such a holographic description. While short strings have zero entropy, he could identify long highly excited string states with ordinary black holes. This was a deep advance because it revealed that strings have a classical interpretation in terms of black holes.

This work showed that the black hole information paradox is resolved when quantum gravity is described in an unusual string-theoretic way assuming the string-theoretical description is complete, unambiguous and non-redundant.^{[15]} The space-time in quantum gravity would emerge as an effective description of the theory of oscillations of a lower-dimensional black-hole horizon, and suggest that any black hole with appropriate properties, not just strings, would serve as a basis for a description of string theory.

In 1995, Susskind, along with collaborators Tom Banks, Willy Fischler, and Stephen Shenker, presented a formulation of the new M-theory using a holographic description in terms of charged point black holes, the D0 branes of type IIA string theory. The matrix theory they proposed was first suggested as a description of two branes in 11-dimensional supergravity by Bernard de Wit, Jens Hoppe, and Hermann Nicolai. The later authors reinterpreted the same matrix models as a description of the dynamics of point black holes in particular limits. Holography allowed them to conclude that the dynamics of these black holes give a complete non-perturbative formulation of M-theory. In 1997, Juan Maldacena gave the first holographic descriptions of a higher-dimensional object, the 3+1-dimensional type IIB membrane, which resolved a long-standing problem of finding a string description which describes a gauge theory. These developments simultaneously explained how string theory is related to some forms of supersymmetric quantum field theories.

## Limit on information densityEdit

Information entropy is defined as the logarithm to the base 2 of the number of possible states of a system. While this if different than physical entropy, applying this definition to a physical system leads to the conclusion that, for a given energy in a given volume, there is an upper limit to the density of information (the Bekenstein bound) about the whereabouts of all the particles which compose matter in that volume.

This suggests that matter itself cannot be subdivided infinitely many times and there must be an ultimate level of fundamental particles. As the degrees of freedom of a particle are the product of all the degrees of freedom of its sub-particles, were a particle to have infinite subdivisions into lower-level particles, the degrees of freedom of the original particle would be infinite, violating the maximal limit of entropy density. The holographic principle thus implies that the subdivisions must stop at some level, and that the fundamental particle is a bit (1 or 0) of information.

The most rigorous realization of the holographic principle is the AdS/CFT correspondence by Juan Maldacena. However, J.D. Brown and Marc Henneaux had rigorously proved already in 1986, that the asymptotic symmetry of 2+1 dimensional gravity gives rise to a Virasoro algebra, whose corresponding quantum theory is a 2-dimensional conformal field theory.^{[16]}

## High-level summaryEdit

The physical universe is widely seen to be composed of "matter" and "energy". In his 2003 article published in Scientific American magazine, Jacob Bekenstein speculatively summarized a current trend started by John Archibald Wheeler, which suggests scientists may "regard the physical world as made of information, with energy and matter as incidentals". Bekenstein asks "Could we, as William Blake memorably penned, 'see a world in a grain of sand', or is that idea no more than 'poetic license'?",^{[17]} referring to the holographic principle.

### Unexpected connectionEdit

Bekenstein's topical overview "A Tale of Two Entropies"^{[18]} describes potentially profound implications of Wheeler's trend, in part by noting a previously unexpected connection between the world of information theory and classical physics. This connection was first described shortly after the seminal 1948 papers of American applied mathematician Claude E. Shannon introduced today's most widely used measure of information content, now known as Shannon entropy. As an objective measure of the quantity of information, Shannon entropy has been enormously useful, as the design of all modern communications and data storage devices, from cellular phones to modems to hard disk drives and DVDs, rely on Shannon entropy.

In thermodynamics (the branch of physics dealing with heat), entropy is popularly described as a measure of the "disorder" in a physical system of matter and energy. In 1877, Austrian physicist Ludwig Boltzmann described it more precisely in terms of the *number of distinct microscopic states* that the particles composing a macroscopic "chunk" of matter could be in, while still *looking* like the same macroscopic "chunk". As an example, for the air in a room, its thermodynamic entropy would equal the logarithm of the count of all the ways that the individual gas molecules could be distributed in the room, and all the ways they could be moving.

### Energy, matter, and information equivalenceEdit

Shannon's efforts to find a way to quantify the information contained in, for example, a telegraph message, led him unexpectedly to a formula with the same form as Boltzmann's. In an article in the August 2003 issue of Scientific American titled "Information in the Holographic Universe", Bekenstein summarizes that "Thermodynamic entropy and Shannon entropy are conceptually equivalent: the number of arrangements that are counted by Boltzmann entropy reflects the amount of Shannon information one would need to implement any particular arrangement" of matter and energy. The only salient difference between the thermodynamic entropy of physics and Shannon's entropy of information is in the units of measure; the former is expressed in units of energy divided by temperature, the latter in *essentially dimensionless* "bits" of information.

The holographic principle states that the entropy of *ordinary mass* (not just black holes) is also proportional to surface area and not volume; that volume itself is illusory and the universe is really a hologram which is isomorphic to the information "inscribed" on the surface of its boundary.^{[11]}

## Experimental testsEdit

The Fermilab physicist Craig Hogan claims that the holographic principle would imply quantum fluctuations in spatial position^{[19]} that would lead to apparent background noise or "holographic noise" measurable at gravitational wave detectors, in particular GEO 600.^{[20]} However these claims have not been widely accepted, or cited, among quantum gravity researchers and appear to be in direct conflict with string theory calculations.^{[21]}

Analyses in 2011 of measurements of gamma ray burst GRB 041219A in 2004 by the INTEGRAL space observatory launched in 2002 by the European Space Agency shows that Craig Hogan's noise is absent down to a scale of 10^{−48} meters, as opposed to the scale of 10^{−35} meters predicted by Hogan, and the scale of 10^{−16} meters found in measurements of the GEO 600 instrument.^{[22]} Research continues at Fermilab under Hogan as of 2013.^{[23]}

Jacob Bekenstein also claimed to have found a way to test the holographic principle with a tabletop photon experiment.^{[24]}

## See alsoEdit

## NotesEdit

**^**except in the case of measurements, which the black hole should not be performing**^**"Complete description" means all the*primary*qualities. For example, John Locke (and before him Robert Boyle) determined these to be*size, shape, motion, number,*and*solidity*. Such*secondary quality*information as*color, aroma, taste*and*sound*,^{[14]}or internal quantum state is not information that is implied to be preserved in the surface fluctuations of the event horizon. (See however "path integral quantization")

## ReferencesEdit

- General

- Bousso, Raphael (2002). "The holographic principle".
*Reviews of Modern Physics*.**74**(3): 825–874. arXiv:hep-th/0203101. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74..825B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825. - 't Hooft, Gerard (1993). "Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity". arXiv:gr-qc/9310026.. 't Hooft's original paper.

- Citations

- ^
^{a}^{b}Susskind, Leonard (1995). "The World as a Hologram".*Journal of Mathematical Physics*.**36**(11): 6377–6396. arXiv:hep-th/9409089. Bibcode:1995JMP....36.6377S. doi:10.1063/1.531249. **^**Thorn, Charles B. (27–31 May 1991).*Reformulating string theory with the 1/N expansion*. International A.D. Sakharov Conference on Physics. Moscow. pp. 447–54. arXiv:hep-th/9405069. Bibcode:1994hep.th....5069T. ISBN 978-1-56072-073-7.**^**Bousso, Raphael (2002). "The Holographic Principle".*Reviews of Modern Physics*.**74**(3): 825–874. arXiv:hep-th/0203101. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74..825B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825.**^**Susskind, L. (2008).*The Black Hole War – My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics*. Little, Brown and Company. p. 419.**^**Marolf, Donald (2009). "Black Holes, AdS, and CFTs".*General Relativity and Gravitation*.**41**(4): 903–17. arXiv:0810.4886. Bibcode:2009GReGr..41..903M. doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0749-7.**^**de Haro et al. 2013, p. 2**^**Klebanov and Maldacena 2009**^**"Top Cited Articles of All Time (2014 edition)". INSPIRE-HEP. Retrieved 26 December 2015.**^**Bekenstein, Jacob D. (January 1981). "Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems".*Physical Review D*.**23**(215): 287–298. Bibcode:1981PhRvD..23..287B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.287.**^**Majumdar, Parthasarathi (1998). "Black Hole Entropy and Quantum Gravity".*Indian Journal of Physics B*.**73**(2): 147. arXiv:gr-qc/9807045. Bibcode:1999InJPB..73..147M.- ^
^{a}^{b}Bekenstein, Jacob D. (August 2003). "Information in the Holographic Universe — Theoretical results about black holes suggest that the universe could be like a gigantic hologram".*Scientific American*. p. 59. **^**Bousso, Raphael (1999). "A Covariant Entropy Conjecture".*Journal of High Energy Physics*.**1999**(7): 004. arXiv:hep-th/9905177. Bibcode:1999JHEP...07..004B. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004.**^**Anderson, Rupert W. (31 March 2015).*The Cosmic Compendium: Black Holes*. Lulu.com. ISBN 9781329024588.^{[self-published source]}**^**Dennett, Daniel (1991).*Consciousness Explained*. New York: Back Bay Books. p. 371. ISBN 978-0-316-18066-5.**^**Susskind, L. (February 2003). "The Anthropic landscape of string theory". arXiv:hep-th/0302219.**^**Brown, J. D. & Henneaux, M. (1986). "Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity".*Communications in Mathematical Physics*.**104**(2): 207–226. Bibcode:1986CMaPh.104..207B. doi:10.1007/BF01211590..**^**Information in the Holographic Universe**^**http://ref-sciam.livejournal.com/1190.html**^**Hogan, Craig J. (2008). "Measurement of quantum fluctuations in geometry".*Physical Review D*.**77**(10): 104031. arXiv:0712.3419. Bibcode:2008PhRvD..77j4031H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.104031..**^**Chown, Marcus (15 January 2009). "Our world may be a giant hologram".*NewScientist*. Retrieved 19 April 2010.**^**"Consequently, he ends up with inequalities of the type... Except that one may look at the actual equations of Matrix theory and see that none of these commutators is nonzero... The last displayed inequality above obviously can't be a consequence of quantum gravity because it doesn't depend on G at all! However, in the G→0 limit, one must reproduce non-gravitational physics in the flat Euclidean background spacetime. Hogan's rules don't have the right limit so they can't be right." – Luboš Motl, Hogan's holographic noise doesn't exist, Feb 7, 2012**^**"Integral challenges physics beyond Einstein". European Space Agency. 30 June 2011. Retrieved 3 February 2013.**^**"Frequently Asked Questions for the Holometer at Fermilab". 6 July 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.**^**Cowen, Ron (22 November 2012). "Single photon could detect quantum-scale black holes".*Nature*. Retrieved 3 February 2013.

## External linksEdit

- Alfonso V. Ramallo:
*Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence*, arXiv:1310.4319, pedagogical lecture. For the holographic principle: see especially Fig. 1. - UC Berkeley's Raphael Bousso gives an introductory lecture on the holographic principle - Video.
*Scientific American*article on holographic principle by Jacob Bekenstein- O'Dowd, Matt (10 April 2019). "The Holographic Universe Explained".
*PBS Space Time*– via YouTube.