# Existence theorem

In mathematics, an **existence theorem** is a theorem with a statement beginning 'there exist(s) ..', or more generally 'for all *x*, *y*, ... there exist(s) ...'. That is, in more formal terms of symbolic logic, it is a theorem with a prenex normal form involving the existential quantifier. Many such theorems will not do so explicitly, as usually stated in standard mathematical language – for example, the statement that the sine function is continuous; or any theorem written in big O notation. The quantification can be found in the definitions of the concepts used.

A controversy that goes back to the early twentieth century concerns the issue of purely theoretic existence theorems, i.e., theorems depending on non-constructive foundational material such as the axiom of infinity, the axiom of choice, or the law of excluded middle. Such theorems provide no indication as to how to exhibit, or construct, the object whose existence is claimed. From a constructivist viewpoint, by admitting them mathematics loses its concrete applicability.^{[1]} The opposing viewpoint is that abstract methods are far-reaching, in a way that numerical analysis cannot be.

## 'Pure' existence resultsEdit

An existence theorem is purely theoretical if the proof given of it does not also indicate a construction of the kind of object whose existence is asserted. Such a proof is non-constructive, and the point is that the whole approach may not lend itself to construction.^{[2]} In terms of algorithms, purely theoretical existence theorems bypass all algorithms for finding what is asserted to exist. They contrast with "constructive" existence theorems.^{[3]} Many constructivist mathematicians work in extended logics (such as intuitionistic logic) where such existence statements are intrinsically weaker than their constructive counterparts.

Such purely theoretical existence results are in any case ubiquitous in contemporary mathematics. For example, John Nash's original proof of the existence of a Nash equilibrium, from 1951, was such an existence theorem. In 1962 a constructive approach was found.^{[4]}

## Constructivist ideasEdit

From the other direction there has been considerable clarification of what constructive mathematics is; without the emergence of a 'master theory'. For example, according to Errett Bishop's definitions, the continuity of a function such as sin *x* should be proved as a constructive bound on the modulus of continuity, meaning that the existential content of the assertion of continuity is a promise that can always be kept. One could get another explanation from type theory, in which a proof of an existential statement can come only from a *term* (which we can see as the computational content).

## See alsoEdit

## NotesEdit

**^**See the section on nonconstructive proofs of the entry "*Constructive proof*".**^**Dennis E. Hesseling (6 December 2012).*Gnomes in the Fog: The Reception of Brouwer’s Intuitionism in the 1920s*. Birkhäuser. p. 376. ISBN 978-3-0348-7989-7.**^**Isaak Rubinstein; Lev Rubinstein (28 April 1998).*Partial Differential Equations in Classical Mathematical Physics*. Cambridge University Press. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-521-55846-4.**^**Schaefer, Uwe (3 December 2014).*From Sperner's Lemma to Differential Equations in Banach Spaces : An Introduction to Fixed Point Theorems and their Applications*. KIT Scientific Publishing. p. 31. ISBN 978-3-7315-0260-9.