# Euler's identity

In mathematics, **Euler's identity**^{[n 1]} (also known as Euler's equation) is the equality

where

- e is Euler's number, the base of natural logarithms,
- i is the imaginary unit, which by definition satisfies
*i*^{2}= −1, and - π is pi, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.

Euler's identity is named after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. It is considered to be an exemplar of mathematical beauty as it shows a profound connection between the most fundamental numbers in mathematics.

## Mathematical beautyEdit

Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deep mathematical beauty.^{[3]} Three of the basic arithmetic operations occur exactly once each: addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants:^{[4]}

- The number 0.
- The number 1.
- The number π (π = 3.141...).
- The number
*e*(*e*= 2.718...), which occurs widely in mathematical analysis. - The number
*i*, the imaginary unit of the complex numbers.

Furthermore, the equation is given in the form of an expression set equal to zero, which is common practice in several areas of mathematics.

Stanford University mathematics professor Keith Devlin has said, "like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form that is far more than just skin deep, Euler's equation reaches down into the very depths of existence".^{[5]} And Paul Nahin, a professor emeritus at the University of New Hampshire, who has written a book dedicated to Euler's formula and its applications in Fourier analysis, describes Euler's identity as being "of exquisite beauty".^{[6]}

Mathematics writer Constance Reid has opined that Euler's identity is "the most famous formula in all mathematics".^{[7]} And Benjamin Peirce, a 19th-century American philosopher, mathematician, and professor at Harvard University, after proving Euler's identity during a lecture, stated that the identity "is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth".^{[8]}

A poll of readers conducted by *The Mathematical Intelligencer* in 1990 named Euler's identity as the "most beautiful theorem in mathematics".^{[9]} In another poll of readers that was conducted by *Physics World* in 2004, Euler's identity tied with Maxwell's equations (of electromagnetism) as the "greatest equation ever".^{[10]}

A study of the brains of sixteen mathematicians found that the "emotional brain" (specifically, the medial orbitofrontal cortex, which lights up for beautiful music, poetry, pictures, etc.) lit up more consistently for Euler's identity than for any other formula.^{[11]}

At least two books in popular mathematics have been published about Euler's identity. One is *A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's formula and the beauty of mathematics*, by David Stipp (2017). Another is *Euler's Pioneering Equation: The most beautiful theorem in mathematics*, by Robin Wilson (2018).

## ExplanationsEdit

### Imaginary exponentsEdit

Fundamentally, Euler's identity asserts that is equal to −1. The expression is a special case of the expression , where *z* is any complex number. In general, is defined for complex *z* by extending one of the definitions of the exponential function from real exponents to complex exponents. For example, one common definition is:

Euler's identity therefore states that the limit, as *n* approaches infinity, of is equal to −1. This limit is illustrated in the animation to the right.

Euler's identity is a special case of Euler's formula, which states that for any real number *x*,

where the inputs of the trigonometric functions sine and cosine are given in radians.

In particular, when *x* = *π*,

Since

and

it follows that

which yields Euler's identity:

### Geometric interpretationEdit

Any complex number can be represented by the point on the complex plane. This point can also be represented in polar coordinates as , where *r* is the absolute value of *z* (distance from the origin), and is the argument of *z* (angle counterclockwise from the positive *x*-axis). By the definitions of sine and cosine, this point has cartesian coordinates of , implying that . According to Euler's formula, this is equivalent to saying .

Euler's identity says that . Since is for *r* = 1 and , this can be interpreted as a fact about the number −1 on the complex plane: its distance from the origin is 1, and its angle from the positive *x*-axis is radians.

Additionally, when any complex number *z* is multiplied by , it has the effect of rotating *z* counterclockwise by an angle of on the complex plane. Since multiplication by −1 reflects a point across the origin, Euler's identity can be interpreted as saying that rotating any point radians around the origin has the same effect as reflecting the point across the origin.

## GeneralizationsEdit

Euler's identity is also a special case of the more general identity that the nth roots of unity, for *n* > 1, add up to 0:

Euler's identity is the case where *n* = 2.

In another field of mathematics, by using quaternion exponentiation, one can show that a similar identity also applies to quaternions. Let {*i*, *j*, *k*} be the basis elements; then,

In general, given real *a*_{1}, *a*_{2}, and *a*_{3} such that *a*_{1}^{2} + *a*_{2}^{2} + *a*_{3}^{2} = 1, then,

For octonions, with real *a*_{n} such that *a*_{1}^{2} + *a*_{2}^{2} + ... + *a*_{7}^{2} = 1, and with the octonion basis elements {*i*_{1}, *i*_{2}, ..., *i*_{7}},

## HistoryEdit

It has been claimed that Euler's identity appears in his monumental work of mathematical analysis published in 1748, *Introductio in analysin infinitorum*.^{[12]} However, it is questionable whether this particular concept can be attributed to Euler himself, as he may never have expressed it.^{[13]} Moreover, while Euler did write in the *Introductio* about what we today call Euler's formula,^{[14]} which relates e with cosine and sine terms in the field of complex numbers, the English mathematician Roger Cotes (who died in 1716, when Euler was only 9 years old) also knew of this formula and Euler may have acquired the knowledge through his Swiss compatriot Johann Bernoulli.^{[13]}

Robin Wilson states the following.^{[15]}

We've seen how it [Euler's identity] can easily be deduced from results of Johann Bernoulli and Roger Cotes, but that neither of them seems to have done so. Even Euler does not seem to have written it down explicitly – and certainly it doesn't appear in any of his publications – though he must surely have realized that it follows immediately from his identity [i.e. Euler's formula],

e= cos^{ix}x+isinx. Moreover, it seems to be unknown who first stated the result explicitly….

## See alsoEdit

## NotesEdit

**^**The term "Euler's identity" (or "Euler identity") is also used elsewhere to refer to other concepts, including the related general formula e^{ix}= cos*x*+*i*sin*x*,^{[1]}and the Euler product formula.^{[2]}

## ReferencesEdit

**^**Dunham, 1999, p. xxiv.**^**Stepanov, S. A. (7 February 2011). "Euler identity".*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*. Retrieved 7 September 2018.**^**Gallagher, James (13 February 2014). "Mathematics: Why the brain sees maths as beauty".*BBC News Online*. Retrieved 26 December 2017.**^**Paulos, 1992, p. 117.**^**Nahin, 2006, p. 1.**^**Nahin, 2006, p. xxxii.**^**Reid, chapter*e*.**^**Maor, p. 160, and Kasner & Newman, p. 103–104.**^**Wells, 1990.**^**Crease, 2004.**^**Zeki et al., 2014.**^**Conway & Guy, p. 254–255.- ^
^{a}^{b}Sandifer, p. 4. **^**Euler, p. 147.**^**Wilson, p. 151-152.

## SourcesEdit

- Conway, John H., and Guy, Richard K. (1996),
*The Book of Numbers*, Springer ISBN 978-0-387-97993-9 - Crease, Robert P. (10 May 2004), "The greatest equations ever",
*Physics World*[registration required] - Dunham, William (1999),
*Euler: The Master of Us All*, Mathematical Association of America ISBN 978-0-88385-328-3 - Euler, Leonhard (1922),
*Leonhardi Euleri opera omnia. 1, Opera mathematica. Volumen VIII, Leonhardi Euleri introductio in analysin infinitorum. Tomus primus*, Leipzig: B. G. Teubneri - Kasner, E., and Newman, J. (1940),
*Mathematics and the Imagination*, Simon & Schuster - Maor, Eli (1998),
*e: The Story of a number*, Princeton University Press ISBN 0-691-05854-7 - Nahin, Paul J. (2006),
*Dr. Euler's Fabulous Formula: Cures Many Mathematical Ills*, Princeton University Press ISBN 978-0-691-11822-2 - Paulos, John Allen (1992),
*Beyond Numeracy: An Uncommon Dictionary of Mathematics*, Penguin Books ISBN 0-14-014574-5 - Reid, Constance (various editions),
*From Zero to Infinity*, Mathematical Association of America - Sandifer, C. Edward (2007),
*Euler's Greatest Hits*, Mathematical Association of America ISBN 978-0-88385-563-8 - Stipp, David (2017),
*A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's formula and the beauty of mathematics*, Basic Books - Wells, David (1990), "Are these the most beautiful?",
*The Mathematical Intelligencer*, 12: 37–41, doi:10.1007/BF03024015 - Wilson, Robin (2018),
*Euler's Pioneering Equation: The most beautiful theorem in mathematics*, Oxford University Press - Zeki, S.; Romaya, J. P.; Benincasa, D. M. T.; Atiyah, M. F. (2014), "The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates",
*Frontiers in Human Neuroscience*,**8**, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068, PMC 3923150

## External linksEdit

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Euler's identity |