# Drag crisis

This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In fluid dynamics, **drag crisis** (also **Eiffel paradox**^{[1]} or **Lukyanov–Eiffel paradox**^{[2]}) is a phenomenon in which drag coefficient drops off suddenly as Reynolds number increases. This has been well studied for round bodies like spheres and cylinders. The drag coefficient of a sphere will change rapidly from about 0.5 to 0.2 at a Reynolds number in the range of 300000. This corresponds to the point where the flow pattern changes, leaving a narrower turbulent wake. The behavior is highly dependent on small differences in the condition of the surface of the sphere.

Drag crisis. Lukyanov–Eiffel paradox, YouTube video |

## Contents

## HistoryEdit

The drag crisis was first identified in 1905 by a Russian student G.I.Lukyanov^{[3]} in experiments on wind tunnel of Moscow University. The superviser of the experiments, Zhukovsky correctly guessed that this paradox can be explained by ``detachment of streamlines at different points of the sphere at different velocities``^{[4]}.

Later the paradox was independently discovered in experiments by G.Eiffel^{[5]} and Maurain^{[6]}.
Gustave Eiffel is known as a man who designed and built the Eiffel Tower, and the Statue of Liberty. Upon his retirement, he built the first wind tunnel in a lab located at the basis of the Eiffel Tower, to investigate wind loads on structures and early aircraft. In a series of test he found that the force loading experienced an abrupt decline at a critical Reynolds number.

A clear explanation of the paradox from the point of view of boundary-layer theory is due to German fluid dynamicist L.Prandtl^{[7]}.

## ExplanationEdit

This transition is associated with a transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layer flow adjacent to the object in question. In the case of cylindrical structures this transition is associated with a transition from well organized vortex shedding to randomized shedding behavior for super-critical Reynolds numbers, eventually returning to well organized shedding at the post-critical Reynolds number with a return to elevated drag force coefficients.

The super-critical behavior can be described semi-empirically using statistical means or by sophisticated computational fluid dynamics software (CFD) that takes into account the fluid-structure interaction for the given fluid conditions.

The critical Reynolds number is a function of turbulence intensity, upstream velocity profile, and wall-effects (velocity gradients). The semi-empirical descriptions of the drag crisis are often described in terms of a Strouhal bandwidth and the vortex shedding is described by broad-band spectral content.

## ReferencesEdit

**^**Birkhoff, Garrett (2015).*Hydrodynamics: A study in logic, fact, and similitude*. Princeton University Press. p. 41.**^**Drag crisis. Lukyanov–Eiffel paradox**^**A table with drag coefficient data for Lukyanov's experiments can be found on page 73 in Zhukovsky, N.Ye. (1938).*Collected works of N.Ye.Zukovskii*.**^**Op.cit, p. 72.**^**Eiffel G. Sur la résistance des sphères dans l'air en mouvement, 1912**^**Toussaint, A. (1923).*Lecture on Aerodynamics*(PDF). NACA Technical Memorandum No. 227. p. 20.**^**Prandtl L. Der Luftwiderstand von Kugeln (1914)

## Additional readingEdit

[1] Fung, Y.C., (1960), "Fluctuating Lift and Drag Acting on a Cylinder in a Flow at Supercritical Reynolds Numbers," J. Aerospace Sci., 27 (11), pp. 801-814.

[2] Roshko, A. (1961) "Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at very high Reynolds number," J. Fluid Mech., 10, pp. 345-356.

[3] Jones,G.W. (1968) "Aerodynamic Forces on Stationary and Oscillating Circular Cylinder at High Reynolds Numbers," ASME Symposium on Unsteady Flow, Fluids Engineering Div. , pp. 1-30.

[4] Jones,G.W., Cincotta, J.J., Walker, R.W. (1969) "Aerodynamic Forces on Stationary and Oscillating Circular Cylinder at High Reynolds Numbers," NASA Report TAR-300, pp. 1-66.

[5] Achenbach, E. Heinecke, E. (1981) "On vortex shedding from smooth and rough cylinders in the range of Reynolds numbers 6x103 to 5x106," J. Fluid Mech. 109, pp. 239-251.

[6] Schewe, G. (1983) "On the force fluctuations acting on a circular cylinder in crossflow from subcritical up to transcritical Raynolds numbers," J. Fluid Mech., 133, pp.265-285.

[7] Kawamura, T., Nakao, T., Takahashi, M., Hayashi, T., Murayama, K., Gotoh, N., (2003), "Synchronized Vibrations of a Circular Cylinder in Cross Flow at Supercritical Reynolds Numbers", ASME J. Press. Vessel Tech., 125, pp. 97-108, DOI:10.1115/1.1526855.

[8] Zdravkovich, M.M. (1997), Flow Around Circular Cylinders, Vol.I, Oxford Univ. Press. Reprint 2007, p.188.

[9] Zdravkovich, M.M. (2003), Flow Around Circular Cylinders, Vol. II, Oxford Univ. Press. Reprint 2009, p.761.

[10] Bartran, D. (2015) "Support Flexibility and Natural Frequencies of Pipe Mounted Thermowells," ASME J. Press. Vess. Tech., 137, pp.1-6 , DOI:10.1115/1.4028863

[11] Botterill, N. ( 2010) "Fluid structure interaction modelling of cables used in civil engineering structures," PhD dissertation (http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/11657/), University of Nottingham.

## External linksEdit

- "Simulating Drag Crisis for a Sphere Using Skin Friction Boundary Conditions" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-10-24.
- "Flow past a cylinder: Shear layer instability and drag crisis" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-10-24.

This physics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |