Black v Chrétien

  (Redirected from Black v. Chrétien)

Black v Chrétien (2001)[1][2][3] is the name of a legal dispute between businessman Conrad Black and Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien over Chrétien's ability to prevent Black, a dual British-Canadian citizen, from obtaining a peerage in the British House of Lords. The Court of Appeal for Ontario ruled in favour of Chrétien, and Black renounced his Canadian citizenship.

Chrétien's argumentsEdit

Elizabeth II was, as Queen of the United Kingdom acting on the advice of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, to honour Black by raising him to the peerage. However, the Canadian Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, gave the conflicting advice on behalf of Canada to the Queen that the Canadian government's position was that a Canadian citizen should not receive such a titular honour,[4] citing the non-binding 1919 Nickle Resolution. Chrétien held that, despite the British government honouring Black as a British citizen, and Black's holding dual citizenship of Canada and Britain (allowed since 1977), the government of Canada had the right to make known the government's stance relating to elevating Black to the British peerage as he was also a Canadian citizen.

In similar cases, Welsh-born computer entrepreneur Sir Terry Matthews and Winnipeg-born Sir George Sayers Bain, head of Queen's University in Belfast, both Canadian citizens but British residents, were honoured with knighthoods. Jean Chrétien and Foreign Affairs Minister John Manley sent diplomatic protests to London against the British government's interference in Canadian affairs.

Chrétien was quoted by a BBC report as saying[5]

"What I and the government object to is that, by conferring the knighthoods without seeking the agreement of the Canadian government, you have not taken into account the Canadian government policy with regard to how Canadian citizens should be honoured."

Black's argumentsEdit

Black said he would accept the peerage as a British citizen instead, but Chrétien held firm to his ministerial advice. Black then argued that this strict interpretation of the Nickle Resolution was payback for his political opinions and past criticism of Chrétien, and sued the prime minister unsuccessfully.

Black's supporters argued that Canada did not object to the granting of honours to dual citizens such as Ontario native Sir Bryant Godman Irvine who was knighted in 1986. So too was a prominent Quebecker, the British and Canadian industrialist, Sir Neil McGowan Shaw (born 1929) in 1994. Finally, former prime minister Pierre Trudeau's own personal expert on Canadian symbols, Sir Conrad Swan, was knighted by the Queen when he was serving in the Royal Household as Garter Principal King of Arms (1992–1995), the chief heraldic officer at London's College of Arms.

The British government disagreed on the grounds that it was honouring its own citizens who only happened to be Canadians as well. It held that it was inappropriate for the Prime Minister of Canada to advise the Queen of the United Kingdom, just as it would have been inappropriate for the British Prime Minister to advise the Queen of Canada on Canadian domestic affairs.

Court decisionEdit

The court concluded that the prime minister had a constitutional right to advise the Queen of Canada on exercising her royal prerogative.[6] However, in this case, the prime minister's advice was to a "foreign head of state", and subsequently Elizabeth II did not receive the Prime Minister's "advice in her capacity as Queen of Canada; rather he was advising the Queen as a foreign head of state in her capacity as the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as to Canada's policy regarding the conferral of foreign honours on its citizens, an act he could have done for any foreign head of state".[4] In short, the prime minister was simply informing a foreign state of Canada's policy regarding the granting of honours to its citizens, an act which the court found that he had the legal privilege to do.

Aftermath of the affairEdit

In 2001, Black renounced his citizenship of Canada, which he then called "an oppressive little world". Eric Reguly wrote in The Times: "The great man fled his native Canada for Britain. He couldn't wait to leave, he said, because Canada was turning into a Third World dump run by raving socialists."[7] Black's lawyer, Eddie Greenspan, later stated Black's citizenship "was stolen from him" by "spiteful" former prime minister Jean Chrétien.[8]

Black was granted a life peerage as Baron Black of Crossharbour, in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Lord Black sat as a member of the Conservative Party until July 13, 2007, when he was denied the whip (effectively, expulsion from the Conservative benches) because of his conviction on fraud charges. On May 15, 2019, he was granted a full pardon by President Donald Trump.[9]

In September 2006, The Globe and Mail reported Black was taking steps to regain Canadian citizenship.[10] He may have desired this to qualify for prisoner exchange and benefit from Canadian early release policies[11] or to enable him to cross the border following a conviction. In a TVOntario interview, Black claimed, "I always said that I would take my citizenship back, and if it wasn't for all these legal problems, I would have done it by now." He told interviewer Steve Paikin that he was working through "normal channels".[12] Black also said, "I have settled into my new life as freedom fighter. It's very interesting, it's quite stimulating in a way, but it is an ordeal."[13]

Even without Canadian citizenship, Black continued to be a member of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, to which he was appointed by Governor General Ray Hnatyshyn, on the advice of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, in 1992.[14] The appointment was strictly honorific, as the Privy Council has no substantive power and meets very rarely. In fact, the council last formally met in 1981, so Black never actually attended a Privy Council meeting. In 2014 Conrad Black was once again living in Canada; however, the Governor General accepted the advice of the Order of Canada Advisory Committee and the Prime Minister to remove Black from both the Order of Canada and the Privy Council.[15]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ 2001 CanLII 8537, 54 OR (3d) 215, 199 DLR (4th) 228 (ONCA)
  2. ^ "Black v Chrétien Court of Appeal for Ontario September 12, 2000". Ontariocourts.on.ca. Retrieved 2017-09-19.
  3. ^ "Black v. Canada (Prime Minister)". CanLII. Retrieved 2020-09-16.
  4. ^ a b Mark Walters (2011). "The Law behind the Conventions of the Constitution: Reassessing the Prorogation Debate" (PDF). Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law. 5: 143. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-10. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  5. ^ "Knighthood sparks diplomatic row". BBC News. 18 June 2001.
  6. ^ "Black v Chrétien: suing a Minister of the Crown for abuse of power, misfeasance in public office and negligence".
  7. ^ "Black is back and ready for a fight..." Times Online. Archived from the original on June 12, 2011.
  8. ^ "Eddie Greenspan '68 Confident Conrad Black will Win in Court". Archived from the original on September 16, 2008.
  9. ^ "Trump pardons billionaire friend Conrad Black, who wrote a book about him". The Washington Post. 2019.
  10. ^ Perkins, Tara (November 26, 2005). "New law could block Black's citizenship bid". globeandmail.com.
  11. ^ Tedesko, Theresa (July 17, 2008). "Conrad Black's defence readies for U.S. Supreme Court appeal". Canwest News Service. Archived from the original on November 7, 2012.
  12. ^ CBC News: Conrad Black wants to be Canadian again September 26, 2006
  13. ^ http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/September2006/22/c9085.html. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  14. ^ "The European Union, Britain and the United States: Which Way to Go?". The Nixon Center. Archived from the original on August 15, 2000. Retrieved June 18, 2010.
  15. ^ "Termination of Appointment to the Order of Canada". gg.ca. January 31, 2014. Retrieved 2017-09-19.