# Axiom schema

In mathematical logic, an **axiom schema** (plural: **axiom schemata** or **axiom schemas**) generalizes the notion of axiom.

## Formal definitionEdit

An axiom schema is a formula in the metalanguage of an axiomatic system, in which one or more schematic variables appear. These variables, which are metalinguistic constructs, stand for any term or subformula of the system, which may or may not be required to satisfy certain conditions. Often, such conditions require that certain variables be free, or that certain variables not appear in the subformula or term^{[citation needed]}.

## Finite axiomatizationEdit

Given that the number of possible subformulas or terms that can be inserted in place of a schematic variable is countably infinite, an axiom schema stands for a countably infinite set of axioms. This set can usually be defined recursively. A theory that can be axiomatized without schemata is said to be *finitely axiomatized*. Theories that can be finitely axiomatized are seen as a bit more metamathematically elegant, even if they are less practical for deductive work.^{[citation needed]}

## ExamplesEdit

Two very well known instances of axiom schemata are the:

- induction schema that is part of Peano's axioms for the arithmetic of the natural numbers;
- axiom schema of replacement that is part of the standard ZFC axiomatization of set theory.

Czesław Ryll-Nardzewski proved that Peano arithmetic cannot be finitely axiomatized and Richard Montague proved that ZFC cannot be finitely axiomatized.^{[1]} Hence, the axiom schemata cannot be eliminated from these theories. This is also the case for quite a few other axiomatic theories in mathematics, philosophy, linguistics, etc.

## Finitely axiomatized theoriesEdit

All theorems of ZFC are also theorems of von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory, but the latter can be finitely axiomatized. The set theory New Foundations can be finitely axiomatized, but only with some loss of elegance.

## In higher-order logicEdit

Schematic variables in first-order logic are usually trivially eliminable in second-order logic, because a schematic variable is often a placeholder for any property or relation over the individuals of the theory. This is the case with the schemata of *Induction* and *Replacement* mentioned above. Higher-order logic allows quantified variables to range over all possible properties or relations.

## See alsoEdit

## NotesEdit

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (May 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

**^**Czesław Ryll-Nardzewski 1952; Richard Montague 1961.

## ReferencesEdit

- Corcoran, John (2006), "Schemata: the Concept of Schema in the History of Logic",
*Bulletin of Symbolic Logic*,**12**: 219–240. - Corcoran, John (2016). "Schema". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).
*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy*. - Mendelson, Elliott (1997),
*An Introduction to Mathematical Logic*(4th ed.), Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0-412-80830-7. - Montague, Richard (1961), "Semantic Closure and Non-Finite Axiomatizability I", in Samuel R. Buss (ed.),
*Infinitistic Methods: Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics*, Pergamon Press, pp. 45–69. - Potter, Michael (2004),
*Set Theory and Its Philosophy*, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199269730. - Ryll-Nardzewski, Czesław (1952), "The role of the axiom of induction in elementary arithmetic" (PDF),
*Fundamenta Mathematicae*,**39**: 239–263.