Alaric I

Alaric I (/ˈælərɪk/; Gothic: Alareiks, 𐌰𐌻𐌰𐍂𐌴𐌹𐌺𐍃, "ruler of all";[2] Latin: Alaricus; 370 (or 375) – 410 AD) was the first king of the Visigoths from 395–410. He ruled the tribe that came to occupy Moesia – territory acquired a couple of decades earlier by a combined force of Goths and Alans in the wake of the dramatic Battle of Adrianople.

Alaric
Alaric entering Athens.jpg
Imaginary 1920s depiction of Alaric parading through Athens after conquering the city in 395
King of the Visigoths
Reign395–410
Coronation395
PredecessorAthanaric
SuccessorAtaulf
Born370 (or 375)
Peuce Island, Dobruja (present-day Romania)
Died410
Cosenza, Calabria, Italy
Burial
DynastyBalt
FatherUnknown[1]
ReligionArianism

Alaric began his career under the Gothic soldier Gainas, and later joined the Roman army. Once an ally of Rome under the Emperor Theodosius, Alaric helped defeat the Franks. Despite sacrificing many thousands of his men, he received little recognition from Rome for his efforts and left the Roman army disappointed. In 395, he was made elected king of the Visigoths and on several occasions marched against Rome. He is best known for his sack of Rome in 410, which marked one of several decisive events in the Western Roman Empire's eventual decline.

Early lifeEdit

 
Imaginary portrait of Alaric in C. Strahlheim, Das Welttheater, 4. Band, Frankfurt a.M., 1836

Born on Peuce Island at the mouth of the Danube Delta in present-day Romania, Alaric belonged to the noble Balti dynasty of the Tervingian Goths.[3][a] When the Goths suffered setbacks against the Huns, they made a mass migration across the Danube, and fought a war with Rome. Alaric was probably a child during this period.[5]

Alaric's childhood in the Balkans, where the Goths had settled by way of an agreement with Theodosius, was spent in the company of veterans who had fought at the Battle of Adrianople in 378,[b] where they had annihilated much of the Eastern army and killed Emperor Valens.[7] Imperial campaigns against the Visigoths were conducted until a treaty was reached in 382. This treaty was the first foedus on imperial Roman soil and required these semi-autonomous Germanic tribes—among whom Alaric was raised—to supply troops for the Roman army in exchange for peace, the access to cultivatable land, and freedom from Roman legal strictures.[8] For several subsequent decades, many Goths like Alaric were "called up into regular units of the eastern field army" while others served as auxiliaries in campaigns led by Theodosius against the western usurpers Magnus Maximus and Eugenius.[9]

In Roman service and rise to Gothic leadershipEdit

A new phase in the relationship between the Goths and the empire resulted from the treaty signed in 382, as more and more Goths attained aristocratic rank from their service in the imperial army.[10] Alaric began his military career under the Gothic soldier Gainas, and later joined the Roman army.[c] He first appeared as leader of a mixed band of Goths and allied peoples, who invaded Thrace in 391 but were stopped by the half-Vandal Roman General Stilicho. In 394, he led a Gothic force that helped Roman Emperor Theodosius defeat the Frankish usurper Arbogast at the Battle of Frigidus.[13] Despite sacrificing around 10,000 of his men, Alaric received little recognition from the emperor. Refused the reward he expected that included a promotion to magisterium and command of regular Roman units, Alaric mutinied and began to march against Constantinople.[14]

On 17 January 395, Theodosius died of an illness, leaving his two young sons Arcadius and Honorius in Stilicho's guardianship.[15] Distinguishing himself among his people, Alaric, who had once dreamed of becoming a Roman general,[16] a rank he acquired first from Constantinople but lost, then regained in Milan (later Ravenna) and lost a second time,[17] became instead, king of the Visigoths in 395.[18] According to historian Peter Heather, it is not entirely clear in the sources if Alaric rose to prominence at the time the Goths revolted following Theodosius's death, or if he had already risen within his tribe as early as the war against Eugenius.[19][d] Whatever the circumstances, Jordanes, a 6th-century Roman bureaucrat of Gothic origin who later turned his hand to history, recorded that the new king persuaded his people to "seek a kingdom by their own exertions rather than serve others in idleness."[22]

Whether or not Alaric was a member of an ancient Germanic royal clan—claimed by Jordanes and debated by historians—is less important than his emergence as a leader, the first of his kind since Fritigern.[23] Around the time Alaric became king and began asserting his authority, controversy and intrigue erupted between the Eastern and Western sides of the Roman Empire, as General Stilicho attempted to increase his position.[24] Since Theodosius's death left the Empire divided between his two sons, one taking the eastern and the other the western portion of the Empire, Stilicho sought to exploit the situation.[25] Historian Roger Collins points out that while the rivalries created by the two halves of the Empire vying for power worked to Alaric's advantage and that of his people, simply being called to authority by the Gothic people did not solve the practicalities of their needs for survival.[26] Perhaps with these concerns in mind, Alaric took his Gothic army on what historian Edward James describes as a "pillaging campaign" that began first in the East.[18]

In GreeceEdit

 
Alaric in Athens by Ludwig Thiersch, 1894

Alaric's forces made their way down to Athens and along the Adriatic coast, where he sought to force a new peace upon the Romans.[18] His march in 396 included passing through Thermopylae further into Greece, during which his troops plundered for the next year or so as far south as the mountainous Peloponnese peninsula.[27] Only Stilicho's surprise attack with his western field army (having sailed from Italy) stemmed the plundering as he pushed Alaric's forces north into Epirus. Despite the successful efforts of Stilicho, the east Roman official Eutropius—to whom power had passed after the death of Rufinus—expressed outrage at this unsanctioned intervention and instead of recognizing Stilicho, conferred in 397 onto Alaric the title, magisterium militum, as he thought the Gothic king more malleable than the ambitious Roman general.[27]

After having received this new rank, Alaric acquired ample gold and grain to grant to his followers and negotiations were underway for a more permanent settlement.[28] Stilicho's supporters in Milan were outraged at this seeming betrayal; meanwhile, Eutropius was celebrated in 398 via a parade through Constantinople for having achieved victory over the "wolves of the North."[29][e] Fought more or less to a standstill by Stilicho, the Gothic forces under Alaric were relatively quiet for the next couple of years.[31]

Invading ItalyEdit

According to historian Michael Kulikowski, sometime in the spring of 402 Alaric decided to invade Italy, but no sources from antiquity indicate to what purpose.[32][f] Using Claudian as his source, historian Guy Halsall reports that Alaric's attack actually began in late 401, but since Stilicho was in Raetia "dealing with frontier issues" the two did not first confront one another in Italy until 402.[34]

Two battles were fought. The first was at Pollentia on Easter Sunday, where Stilicho achieved an impressive victory, taking Alaric's wife and children prisoner, and more significantly, seizing much of the treasure that Alaric had amassed over the previous five years' worth of plundering.[35][g] Pursuing the retreating forces of Alaric, Stilicho offered to return the prisoners but was refused. The second battle was at Verona,[35] where Alaric was defeated for a second time. Stilicho once again offered Alaric a truce and allowed him to withdraw from Italy. Kulikowski explains this confounding, if not outright conciliatory behavior by stating, "given Stilicho's cold war with Constantinople, it would have been foolish to destroy as biddable and violent a potential weapon as Alaric might well prove to be".[35] Halsall's observations are similar, as he contends that the Roman general's "decision to permit Alaric's withdrawal into Pannonia makes sense if we see Alaric's force entering Stilicho's service, and Stilicho's victory being less total than Claudian would have us believe".[37] Perhaps more revealing is a report from Zosimus that indicates an agreement was concluded between Stilicho and Alaric in 405, which suggests Alaric being in "western service at that point", likely stemming from arrangements made back in 402.[38][h] Between 404 and 405, Alaric remained in one of the four Pannonian provinces, from where he could "play East off against West while potentially threatening both".[35]

Fate was not kind to the Empire, as "Alaric’s return to the north-west Balkans brought only temporary respite to Italy, for in 405 another substantial body of Goths and other barbarians, this time from outside the empire, crossed the middle Danube and advanced into northern Italy, where they plundered the countryside and besieged cities and towns" under their leader Radagaisus.[40] Although the imperial government was struggling to muster enough troops to contain these barbarian invasions, Stilicho managed to stifle the threat posed by the tribes under Radagaisus, when the latter split his forces into three separate groups. Stilicho cornered Radagaisus near Florence and starved the invaders into submission.[40][i] Meanwhile, Alaric—bestowed with codicils of magister militum by Stilicho and now supplied by the West—awaited for one side or the other to incite him to action as Stilicho faced further difficulties from more barbarians.[42]

Second invasion of ItalyEdit

Sometime in 406 and into 407, another assemblage of barbarians, consisting primarily of Vandals, Sueves and Alans, crossed the Rhine into Gaul while at the same time a rebellion—under a common soldier named Constantine—occurred in Britain and spread to Gaul.[43] Burdened by so many enemies, Stilicho's position was strained. During this crisis in 407, Alaric again marched on Italy, taking a position in Noricum (modern Austria), where he demanded a sum of 4,000 pounds of gold lest he embark again on a full-scale invasion. At this point, Stilicho, whose earlier efforts to deal with the usurper Constantine had failed, convinced the Western Emperor Honorius and the Roman senate—who begrudgingly agreed[44]—to pay the sum and unleash Alaric's forces on their new enemy.[45] Despite how sensible Stilicho’s plan was in the grand scheme of things, since he had correctly evaluated the dangers, arguing for Alaric's intervention after having failed to contain the threat to Rome, fatally weakened his standing.[45]

In 408, Western Emperor Honorius ordered the execution of Stilicho and his family, in response to rumors that the general had made a deal with Alaric.[j] While Stilicho had been murdered, so too had his loyal supporters and many thousands of barbarian auxiliaries, along with their wives and children, those that remained alive or escaped joined Alaric at Noricum.[47] Rome had made itself more vulnerable as a result and Alaric now once again made demands on Honorius for an unknown sum of gold and for the return of the civilian dependent hostages belonging to his new followers—if they remained alive.[48]

When Alaric was rebuffed, he led his force of around 30,000 men—many newly enlisted and understandably motivated—on a march toward Rome to avenge their murdered families.[49] Crossing the Julian Alps in September 408, Alaric stood before the walls of Rome (now with no capable general like Stilicho as a defender) and began a strict blockade. No blood was shed this time; Alaric relied on hunger as his most powerful weapon. When the ambassadors of the Senate, entreating for peace, tried to intimidate him with hints of what the despairing citizens might accomplish, he laughed and gave his celebrated answer: "The thicker the hay, the easier mowed!" After much bargaining, the famine-stricken citizens agreed to pay a ransom of 5,000 pounds of gold, 30,000 pounds of silver, 4,000 silken tunics, 3,000 hides dyed scarlet, and 3,000 pounds of pepper.[50] Along came 40,000 freed Gothic slaves. Thus ended Alaric's first siege of Rome.[39]

 
The Sack of Rome by the Visigoths on 24 August 410 by J-N Sylvestre (1890)

After having provisionally agreed to the terms offered by Alaric for lifting the blockade, Honorius recanted; historian A.D. Lee highlights that one of the points of contention for the emperor was Alaric's expectation of being named head of the Roman Army, a post Honorius was not prepared to grant to Alaric.[51] When this title was not bestowed onto Alaric, he proceeded to not only "besiege Rome again in late 409, but also to proclaim a leading senator, Priscus Attalus, as a rival emperor, from whom Alaric then received the appointment" he desired.[51] Meanwhile, Alaric's newly appointed "emperor" Attalus, who seems not to have known the limits of his power or understand his dependence on Alaric, failed to take the latter's advice and lost the grain supply in Africa to a pro-Honorian comes Africae, Heraclian.[52] Then, sometime in 409, Attalus—accompanied by Alaric—marched on Ravenna and after receiving unprecedented terms and concessions from the legitimate emperor Honorius, refused him and instead, demanded that Honorius be deposed and exiled.[52] Fearing for his safety, Honorius made preparations to flee to Ravenna when a ship carrying 4,000 troops arrived from Constantinople, restoring his resolve.[51] Now that it was clear Honorius no longer needed to negotatie, Alaric (regretting his choice of puppet emperor) deposed him, perhaps to re-open negotiations with Ravenna.[53]

Sack of RomeEdit

Negotiations with Honorius might have succeeded had it not been for the influence of another Goth, Sarus, an Amali, and therefore hereditary enemy of Alaric and his house.[39] Why Sarus, who had been in imperial service for years under Stilicho, intervened at this moment remains a mystery, but Alaric interpeted this attack as Ravenna-directed and as bad faith from Honoroius. No longer would negotiations suffice for Alaric, as his patience had reached its end, which led him to march on Rome for a third and final time.[54]

On 24 August 410, Alaric and his forces began the sack of Rome, an assault that lasted three days.[55] After hearing reports that Alaric had entered the city—possibly aided by Gothic slaves inside—there were reports that Emperor Honorius (safe in Ravenna) broke into "wailing and lamentation" but quickly calmed once "it was explained to him that it was the city of Rome that had met its end and not 'Roma'," his pet fowl.[55] Writing from Bethlehem, St. Jerome (Letter 127.12, to Principia)[k] lamented: "A dreadful rumour reached us from the West. We heard that Rome was besieged, that the citizens were buying their safety with gold . . . The city which had taken the whole world was itself taken; nay, it fell by famine before it fell to the sword."[55] Nonetheless, Christian apologists also cited how Alaric ordered that anyone who took shelter in a Church was to be spared.[56][l] When liturgical vessels were taken from the basilica of St. Peter and Alaric heard of this, he ordered them returned and had them ceremoniously restored in the church.[57] If the account from Orosius can be seen as accurate, there was even a celebratory recognition of Christian unity by way of a procession through the streets where Romans and barbarians alike "raised a hymn to God in public"; historian Edward James concludes that such stories are likely more political rhetoric of the "noble" barbarians than a reflection of historical reality.[57]

According to historian Patrick Geary, Roman booty was not the focus of Alaric's sack of Rome but that he had come for needed food supplies.[58][m] Historian Stephen Mitchell asserts that Alaric's followers seemed incapable of feeding themselves and relied on provisions "supplied by the Roman authorities."[59] Whatever Alaric's intentions were cannot be known entirely, but Kulikowski certainly sees the issue of available treasure in a different light, writing that "For three days, Alaric’s Goths sacked the city, stripping it of the wealth of centuries."[54] The barbarian invaders were not gentle in their treatment of property as substantial damage was still evident into the sixth century.[57] Certainly the Roman world was shaken by the fall of the Eternal City to barbarian invaders, but as Guy Halsall emphasizes, "Rome’s fall had less striking political effects. Alaric, unable to treat with Honorius, remained in the political cold."[56] Kulikowski sees the situation similarly, commenting:

But for Alaric the sack of Rome was an admission of defeat, a catastrophic failure. Everything he had hoped for, had fought for over the course of a decade and a half, went up in flames with the capital of the ancient world. Imperial office, a legitimate place for himself and his followers inside the empire, these were now forever out of reach. He might seize what he wanted, as he had seized Rome, but he would never be given it by right. The sack of Rome solved nothing and when the looting was over Alaric’s men still had nowhere to live and fewer future prospects than ever before.[54]

Still, the importance of Alaric cannot be "overestimated" according to Halsall, since he had desired and obtained a Roman command even though he was a barbarian; his real misfortune was being caught between the rivalry of the Eastern and Western empires and their court intrigue.[60] According to historian Peter Brown, when one compares Alaric with other barbarians, "he was almost an Elder Statesman."[61] Nonetheless, Alaric's respect for Roman institutions as a former servant to its highest office did not stay his hand in violently sacking the city that had for centuries exemplified Roman glory, leaving behind physical destruction and social disruption, while Alaric took clerics and even the emperor’s sister, Galla Placidia, with him when he left the city.[57] More than the city of Rome itself was victim to the forces under Alaric, but the remainder of Italy, as Procopius (Wars 3.2.11–13) writing in the sixth-century later relates:

For they destroyed all the cities which they captured, especially those south of the Ionian Gulf, so completely that nothing has been left to my time to know them by, unless, indeed, it might be one tower or gate or some such thing which chanced to remain. And they killed all the people, as many as came in their way, both old and young alike, sparing neither women nor children. Wherefore even up to the present time Italy is sparsely populated.[62]

Whether Alaric's forces wrought the level of destruction described by Procopius or not cannot be known, but evidence speaks to the subsequent population decrease, as the number of people on the food dole dropped from 800,000 in 408 to 500,000 by 419.[63] Rome's fall to the barbarians was as much a psychological blow to the empire as anything else, since some Romans citizens saw the collapse resultant from the conversion to Christianity, while Christian apologists like Augustine (writing City of God) responded in turn;[64] some even saw Alaric—himself a Christian—as God's wrath upon a still pagan Rome; meanwhile, Christians and pagans alike blamed the other religion for the city's fall.[65]

Death and aftermathEdit

 
The burial of Alaric in the bed of the Busento River. 1895 wood engraving.

The Goths were not long in the city of Rome, as only three days after the sack, Alaric marched his men south to Campania, from where he intended to sail to Sicily—probably to obtain grain and other supplies—when a storm destroyed his fleet.[66] During the early months of 411, while on his northward return journey through Italy, Alaric took ill and died at Consentia in Bruttium.[66] His cause of death was likely fever,[67][n] and his body was, according to legend, buried under the riverbed of the Busento in accordance with the pagan practices of the Visigothic people. The stream was temporarily turned aside from its course while the grave was dug, wherein the Gothic chief and some of his most precious spoils were interred. When the work was finished, the river was turned back into its usual channel and the captives by whose hands the labor had been accomplished were put to death that none might learn their secret.[68][o]

Alaric was succeeded in the command of the Gothic army by his brother-in-law, Ataulf,[69] who married Honorius' sister Galla Placidia three years later.[70] Following in the wake of Alaric's leadership, which Kulikowski claims, had given his people "a sense of community that survived his own death...Alaric’s Goths remained together inside the empire, going on to settle in Gaul. There, in the province of Aquitaine, they put down roots and created the first autonomous barbarian kingdom inside the frontiers of the Roman empire."[71] Not long after Alaric's exploits in Rome and Athaulf's settlement in Aquitaine, there is a "rapid emergence of Germanic barbarian groups in the West" who begin controlling many western provinces.[72] These barbarian peoples include: Vandals in Spain and Africa, Visigoths in Spain and Aquitaine, Burgundians along the upper Rhine and southern Gaul, and Franks on the lower Rhine and in northern and central Gaul.[72]

SourcesEdit

The chief authorities on the career of Alaric are: the historian Orosius and the poet Claudian, both contemporary, neither disinterested; Zosimus, a historian who lived probably about half a century after Alaric's death; and Jordanes, a Goth who wrote the history of his nation in 551, basing his work on Cassiodorus's Gothic History. The legend of Alaric's burial in the Buzita River comes from Jordanes.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ To a large extent, Alaric's kin were largely comprised by Tervingi, with whom Constantine had concluded a lasting peace in the 330s.[4]
  2. ^ Many of Rome's leading officers and some of their most elite fighting men died during the battle which struck a major blow to Roman prestige and the Empire's military capabilities.[6]
  3. ^ Alaric had a fascination for the 'golden age' of Rome and insisted on his tribesmen calling him 'Alaricus'.[11][12]
  4. ^ Heather surmises that Alaric's participation in the earlier revolt that followed Maximus' defeat and his "command of Gothic troops on the Eugenius campaign suggest...a noble steadily advancing his prestige among the Goths settled in the Balkans by Theodosius."[20] Kulikowski has heartburn with implying that Alaric held an important position among the Goths before 395 since the sources do not make it clear if Alaric’s “desire for a generalship" was a means to legitimize himself "further within a Gothic following,” or whether he was simply an ambitious man, who was at heart, “essentially a Roman soldier.” Kulikowski adds that trying to determine either “depends upon our own previous assumptions, not upon the evidence.”[21]
  5. ^ This victory celebration included recognizing Eutropius's part in allowing Roman troops to be reinforced by Goths, who jointly ejected the Huns from nearby Armenia.[30]
  6. ^ Some lines from the Roman poet Claudian inform us that he heard a voice proceeding from a sacred grove, "Away with delay, Alaric; boldly cross the Italian Alps this year and thou shalt reach the city."[33]
  7. ^ Stilicho's enemies later reproached him for not having finished off the enemy by slaying them in their entirety.[36]
  8. ^ While Alaric had not penetrated into the city, his invasion of Italy still produced important results. It caused the imperial residence to be transferred from Milan to Ravenna, and necessitated the withdrawal of Legio XX Valeria Victrix from Britain.[39]
  9. ^ Historian Walter Goffart points out that while many sources identify Radagaisus as an Ostrogoth, he and his forces were likely composed of "odds and ends of peoples who crossed into the empire" and that their documented numbers have been inflated.[41]
  10. ^ Despite skillful maneuvering against the Goths, historian J.M. Wallace-Hadrill explains that Stilicho could not endear himself to the Romans, even though he had rescued Rome on two occasions before it fell to Alaric. The reasons he remained "the scapegoat of Roman writers" were many; including that they saw Stilicho as "the man who "sold the pass." Wallace-Hadrill adds, "Partly, it seems, because he (Stilicho) was ready to compromise with the Goths in an attempt to wrest the much-coveted eastern parts of Illyricum from the control of Constantinople. Partly, too, because his concentration on Italian and Balkan affairs left Gaul open to invasion. Partly because his defense policy proved costly to the senatorial class. But most of all, perhaps, because to the Romans, he signified the arrival of Arianism," a belief system that Western Catholics found sacrilegious.[46]
  11. ^ See the New Advent source here: https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3001127.htm
  12. ^ Evidently the piety and restraint of the barbarian soldiers under Alaric, despite their adherence to Arianism, was less pagan in the eyes of Christian writers than the practices of the Romans themselves.[55]
  13. ^ Geary also contends that Alaric had the long term intention to lead his people to North Africa, much like the later Vandals would do.[58]
  14. ^ Scholars have often wondered about the cause of King Alaric's death. As recent as 2016, Francesco Galassi and his colleagues pored over all the historical, medical and epidemiological sources they could find about Alaric's death, and concluded that the underlying cause was malaria. For further information, see: "The sudden death of Alaric I (c. 370–410 AD), the vanquisher of Rome: A tale of malaria and lacking immunity." Francesco M. Galassi, Raffaella Bianucci, Giacomo Gorini, Giacomo M. Paganottie, Michael E. Habicht, Frank J. Rühli. European Journal of Internal Medicine June 2016 Volume 31, Pages 84–87. https://www.ejinme.com/article/S0953-6205(16)00067-4/abstract
  15. ^ A similar story is told of the Decebalus Treasure, buried under a river in 106 AD. These burials repeat Scythian models from the Lower Danube and the Black Sea. See the following Spanish language source: Alarico I (in Spanish), Diccionario biográfico español, Luis Agustín García Moreno, Real Academia de la Historia.

CitationsEdit

  1. ^ Wolfram 1997, p. 90.
  2. ^ Harder 1986, pp. 10–11.
  3. ^ Brion 1930, p. 12.
  4. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 31.
  5. ^ Brion 1930, pp. 13–14.
  6. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 179.
  7. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 11.
  8. ^ Halsall 2007, pp. 179–180.
  9. ^ Kulikowski 2006, pp. 152–153.
  10. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 155.
  11. ^ Bayless 1976, pp. 65–67.
  12. ^ Brion 1930, pp. 141, 161.
  13. ^ Bauer 2010, pp. 72–74.
  14. ^ Kulikowski 2019, p. 125.
  15. ^ Burns 2003, p. 335.
  16. ^ Burns 2003, p. 336.
  17. ^ Burns 2003, p. 367.
  18. ^ a b c James 2014, p. 54.
  19. ^ Heather 1991, p. 197.
  20. ^ Heather 1991, p. 198.
  21. ^ Kulikowski 2002, p. 79.
  22. ^ Jordanes 1915, p. 92 [XXIX.147].
  23. ^ Collins 1999, p. 54.
  24. ^ Heather 2013, pp. 153–160.
  25. ^ McEvoy 2013, p. 142.
  26. ^ Collins 1999, pp. 54–55.
  27. ^ a b Kulikowski 2019, p. 126.
  28. ^ Kelly 2009, p. 52.
  29. ^ Kelly 2009, pp. 52–53.
  30. ^ Kelly 2009, p. 53.
  31. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 200.
  32. ^ Kulikowski 2019, p. 122.
  33. ^ Claudian 1922, p. 165 [XXVI.545].
  34. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 201.
  35. ^ a b c d Kulikowski 2019, p. 135.
  36. ^ Bunson 1995, p. 12.
  37. ^ Halsall 2007, pp. 201–202.
  38. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 202.
  39. ^ a b c Hodgkin 1911, p. 471.
  40. ^ a b Lee 2013, p. 112.
  41. ^ Goffart 2006, p. 78.
  42. ^ Kulikowski 2006, pp. 170–171.
  43. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 171.
  44. ^ Lee 2013, pp. 112–113.
  45. ^ a b Kulikowski 2006, p. 172.
  46. ^ Wallace-Hadrill 2004, pp. 22–23.
  47. ^ Kulikowski 2006, pp. 172–173.
  48. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 173.
  49. ^ Heather 2005, p. 224.
  50. ^ Norwich 1988, p. 134.
  51. ^ a b c Lee 2013, p. 113.
  52. ^ a b Kulikowski 2006, p. 175.
  53. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 176.
  54. ^ a b c Kulikowski 2006, p. 177.
  55. ^ a b c d James 2014, p. 57.
  56. ^ a b Halsall 2007, p. 216.
  57. ^ a b c d James 2014, p. 58.
  58. ^ a b Geary 1988, p. 70.
  59. ^ Mitchell 2007, p. 98.
  60. ^ Halsall 2007, p. 217.
  61. ^ Brown 2000, p. 286.
  62. ^ James 2014, p. 59.
  63. ^ Lançon 2001, pp. 14, 119.
  64. ^ Lee 2013, p. 114.
  65. ^ Burns 1994, p. 233.
  66. ^ a b Mitchell 2007, p. 101.
  67. ^ Durschmied 2002, p. 401.
  68. ^ Hodgkin 1911, pp. 471–472.
  69. ^ Lee 2013, pp. 114–115.
  70. ^ Bunson 1995, p. 53.
  71. ^ Kulikowski 2006, p. 158.
  72. ^ a b Mitchell 2007, p. 110.

BibliographyEdit

  • Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-39305-975-5.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bayless, William N. (1976). "The Visigothic Invasion of Italy in 401". The Classical Journal. 72 (1): 65–67. JSTOR 3296883.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bradley, Henry (1888). The Goths: from the Earliest Times to the End of the Gothic Dominion in Spain. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Brion, Marcel (1930). Alaric, the Goth. New York: R.M. McBride & Co. OCLC 610591020.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Brown, Peter (2000). Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-22835-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bunson, Matthew (1995). A Dictionary of the Roman Empire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19510-233-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Burns, Thomas (1994). Barbarians within the Gates of Rome: A Study of Roman Military Policy and the Barbarians, CA. 375–425 A.D. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-25331-288-4.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Burns, Thomas (2003). Rome and the Barbarians, 100 B.C.–A.D. 400. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-80187-306-5.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Claudian (1922). Claudian II. Translated by Maurice Platnauer. London: W. Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-67499-151-4.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Collins, Roger (1999). Early Medieval Europe, 300–1000. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ISBN 978-0-31221-885-0.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Durschmied, Erik (2002). From Armageddon to the Fall of Rome. London: Coronet Books. ISBN 978-0-34082-177-0.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Geary, Patrick J. (1988). Before France and Germany: The Creation & Transformation of the Merovingian World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19504-458-4.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Goffart, Walter (2006). Barbarian Tides: The Migration Age and the Later Roman Empire. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-81222-105-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Halsall, Guy (2007). Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-52143-543-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Harder, Kelsie B. (1986). Names and Their Varieties: A Collection of Essays in Onomastics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. ISBN 978-0-81915-233-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Heather, Peter (1991). Goths and Romans, 332–489. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19820-234-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Heather, Peter (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19515-954-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Heather, Peter (2013). The Restoration of Rome: Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19936-851-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • James, Edward (2014). Europe's Barbarians, AD 200–600. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-58277-296-0.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Jordanes (1915). The Gothic History of Jordanes. Translated by Charles C. Mierow. London: Oxford University Press. OCLC 463056290.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kelly, Christopher (2009). The End of Empire: Attila the Hun and the Fall of Rome. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-39333-849-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kulikowski, Michael (2002). "Nation versus Army: A Necessary Contrast?". In Andrew Gillett (ed.). On Barbarian Identity: Critical Approaches to Ethnicity in the Early Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. ISBN 2-503-51168-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kulikowski, Michael (2006). Rome's Gothic Wars: From the Third Century to Alaric. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84633-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kulikowski, Michael (2019). The Tragedy of Empire: From Constantine to the Destruction of Roman Italy. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-67466-013-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Lançon, Bertrand (2001). Rome in Late Antiquity: AD 312–609. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-41592-975-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Lee, A. D. (2013). From Rome to Byzantium AD 363 to 565: The Transformation of Ancient Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-74863-175-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • McEvoy, Meaghan (2013). Child Emperor Rule in the Late Roman West, AD 367–455. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19164-210-4.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Mitchell, Stephen (2007). A History of the Later Roman Empire, AD 284–641. Oxford and Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Norwich, John Julius (1988). Byzantium: The Early Centuries. London: Viking. ISBN 978-0-67080-251-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Wallace-Hadrill, J. M. (2004). The Barbarian West, 400–1000. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-63120-292-9.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Wolfram, Herwig (1997). The Roman Empire and its Germanic Peoples. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08511-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

OnlineEdit

External linksEdit

King Alaric I of the Visigoths
Born: 370 Died: 410
Regnal titles
Vacant
Title last held by
Athanaric
King of the Visigoths
395–410
Succeeded by
Ataulf